Jump to content

Reported wages at the club


Melanicus
 Share

Recommended Posts

Reported wages at the club:

Petr Cech, £100,000

Mark Schwarzer, £20,000

Jamal Blackman, £5,000

Henrique Hilario, £12,000

John Terry, £175,000

David Luiz, £75,000

Branislav Ivanovic, £65,000

Gary Cahill, £80,000

Ashley Cole, £120,000

Ryan Bertrand, £40,000

Cesar Azpilicueta, £30,000

Frank Lampard, £125,000

Ramires, £55,000

Michael Essien, £70,000

John Obi Mikel, £75,000

Marco Van Ginkel, £35,000

Eden Hazard, £185,000

Willian, £85,000

Juan Mata, £67,000

Oscar, £40,000

Kevin de Bruyne, £30,000

Andre Schurrle, £78,000

Fernando Torres, £175,000

Samuel Eto'o, £135,000

Demba Ba, £80,000


Some other selected young & Loaned players' weekly wages:

Thibault Courtois, £33,000

Victor Moses, £30,000

Romelu Lukaku, £40,000

Marko Marin, £35,000

Oriol Romeu, £33,000

Josh McEachran, £30,000

Wallace, £20,000

Christian Atsu, £12,000

Lucas Piazon, £15,000

Nathaniel Chalobah, £30,000

Tomas Kalas, £15,000

Gael Kakuta, £25,000

Patrick van Aanholt, £15,000

Kenneth Omeru, £10,000

Cristian Cuevas, £8,000

Nathan Ake, £20,000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mata earning less than Essien and Mikel :doh: We should give him a new contract asap!

On hindsight, after 2 years what he has achieved, seeing him earning that amount right now is obviously :doh:. But back when he joined, 67k p/w wages look reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was on £15k a week or so ago.

Josh's wage is ridiculous to.

Yeah, just seen. Amazing to see the fortunes of players at sugar daddy clubs tbh. Sterling for Liverpool earned his £30k per week wages with being a consistent first team player last season but some of our players who have not even played a game for us are earning more than quality Bundesliga players. I guess Chalobah's wages reflect our message that he is a key part of our future and to ward off interest from other clubs not too surprised we handed him down a lucrative contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wages of some of our older players :doh:

It's because there is no transfer involved. (First off, I don't buy these numbers anyway). Because the transfer fees are counted in step with the length of the contract, having no transfer fee means you can afford much higher wages. For example, Terry at 175K a week would actually be significantly cheaper per year than Willian at 85K because Willian's transfer costs 123K a week or so whereas Terry costs 0 additional money (Willian is actually probably our 2nd or 3rd most expensive player overall). By keeping existing players, you save a lot of money, even paying higher contracts. Even a small transfer (for Chelsea) of 10M pounds on a maximum 5 year deal, is still an additional 38K+ a week. You could pay an existing player 100K/week as opposed to 65K for the new player and you'd still save money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These wages are from Jake Cohen. They are as accurate as it gets. He's put in a lot of effort. You can find them here and the reasoning he gives behind the numbers - http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2013/9/4/4659496/chelsea-player-wage-database

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this just seems like a big waste of time. It's impossible to use the horrific media as sources for ANYTHING football related. How often do we see discrepancies in transfer fees? Almost always, and these are widely reported once a transfer goes through. Now let's discuss something secretive like players' wages, it's impossible to be accurate. I wish there was transparency, but there is not and this has not helped anyone understand the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because there is no transfer involved. (First off, I don't buy these numbers anyway). Because the transfer fees are counted in step with the length of the contract, having no transfer fee means you can afford much higher wages. For example, Terry at 175K a week would actually be significantly cheaper per year than Willian at 85K because Willian's transfer costs 123K a week or so whereas Terry costs 0 additional money (Willian is actually probably our 2nd or 3rd most expensive player overall). By keeping existing players, you save a lot of money, even paying higher contracts. Even a small transfer (for Chelsea) of 10M pounds on a maximum 5 year deal, is still an additional 38K+ a week. You could pay an existing player 100K/week as opposed to 65K for the new player and you'd still save money.

That's definitely a factor, but I don't think it makes sense to just add the fee because obviously the player has nothing to do with what the club paid for him. Schwarzer is on peanuts even though he came on a free, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On hindsight, after 2 years what he has achieved, seeing him earning that amount right now is obviously :doh:. But back when he joined, 67k p/w wages look reasonable.

Yup. When Mata joined he was considered a talented young player, but if his wages went beyond 100k p/w it'd have been far too much for his status at the time. Now he's established himself as one of the best playmaykers in Europe and I can see him sign a new contract soon.

Hazard is another example. He has almost triple the wages of Mata, but when he joined last summer he was (and still is) considered among the top attacking midfielders in Europe and it makes sense for him to earn that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You