Samuel Eto'o

[robsblubot 3,580]

so another striker "who needs time" ?

i've heard that too many times before

agree... while his work rate was above of the other two strikers, his finishing and acceleration don't seem to be there any more.

Hope I am wrong.

[Spyker 27]

the three are shit

Poop Expert!!

[JDY 1,290]

In the first half he showed exactly why he's a better fit for our system than Torres/Ba.

Yes he missed a decent chance (the header), but for his first outing I was pleased with what I saw. Everton away is one of the toughest places to go.

[polo 18]

Poop Expert!!

sorry i think Lukaku was better ahahahhahaaah

[xPetrCechx 13,565]

so another striker "who needs time" ?

i've heard that too many times before

Year after Year... the same shit.

[zolayes 14,489]

In the first half he showed exactly why he's a better fit for our system than Torres/Ba.

Yes he missed a decent chance (the header), but for his first outing I was pleased with what I saw. Everton away is one of the toughest places to go.

Thought it a decent debut ...didnt score so he must be SHITE ,, TC logic

[Magic Lamps 11,677]

He should have scored at least one goal. Ramires cross was perfect and he headed wide. When the ball came to him and the goal was open he rushed his finish. he should have been aware of barry. He only had to stop the ball before shooting and letting barry tackle air. But he does pass miles better than Torres, who loses about every second ball because of inaccurate passes and his headless chicken runs. His workrate was ok and he made good runs. But as it stand we still lack a worldclass striker which makes everything a bit harder

[Ollie 4,400]

Here we go. Gotta love you guys. 1 game and he's shit. Not thinking about how good his movement was and how he got into the positions to score and the fact that only a great challenge from Barry stopped him scoring, he couldn't have done much else. He did ok, bit rusty of course but for someone who's rusty, i think he did alright. Fine lines again. He'll score goals for us, i have no doubts at all.

[ANDRECHO 432]

32 years old and much better than Torres ..

[zolayes 14,489]

32 years old and much better than Torres ..

Im 76 and as good as Torres ,,,whats your point???

[ANDRECHO 432]

Im 76 and as good as Torres ,,,whats your point???

ejjejeje , maybe anybody don't think that . Take it easy ejejej ..

I like the work of Samuel , he plays easy , only one touch and run

[Blue Armour 4,336]

Not bad a performance, but like others have said an in-form Eto'o would have taken the chance which Barry cleared off his feet.

Hopefully he can adjust more to the pace of the EPL game in the coming weeks, and show his worth.

[G.B. 100]

First match - not bad performance. He just has to adjust to EPL and will be better than Torres has ever been for us.

[Kojo 4,676]

so another striker "who needs time" ?

i've heard that too many times before

It's one game, get over yourself.

[polo 18]

Lukaku,Torres > Eto'o

[polo 18]

he's too old pff what a waste

[TorontoChelsea 4,064]

Was poor but everyone has bad performances and it's his first Premier League game ever. The worry for me is that his speed just doesn't seem near the same as it was which negates a big part of his game.

[polo 18]

my sister is 5 years old and she 's better