Christo191 173 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Is this kid rated higher than Charly? He's younger tooI think they 'r different types of footballlers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bethos 2 Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Are there any youth players rated higher than charly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moros 86 Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Yeah like stingray said, playing a few good games as a 16 year old in Belgium doesn't mean you can compete with an almost completely Premier league level squad. However if he progresses I can see him play for the NT in a few years time. Is his potential higher as that of Charly Musonda? That's hard to say. Charly has the advantage of being around and playing against better youths. I guess Chelsea will have better youth staff and training as well. And indeed they're quite different types of players. Considering Charly's flair (he has that Iniesta flavour) most perhaps would pick him. He's great though and always effective and rather composed as well. If Chelsea would buy him he'd certainly could make it in the starting line up some years later.There have been no links between Chelsea and him though. Not yet though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/talent-scout-youri-tielemans--the-next-belgian-star-attracting-interest-from-arsenal-tottenham-and-manchester-city-8859748.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 I was under the impression that he was an attacking midfielder,turns out he is a central/box to box midfielder so he is definitely one to keep an eye on for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goemaere 131 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Yeah like stingray said, playing a few good games as a 16 year old in Belgium doesn't mean you can compete with an almost completely Premier league level squad. However if he progresses I can see him play for the NT in a few years time. Is his potential higher as that of Charly Musonda? That's hard to say. Charly has the advantage of being around and playing against better youths. I guess Chelsea will have better youth staff and training as well. And indeed they're quite different types of players. Considering Charly's flair (he has that Iniesta flavour) most perhaps would pick him. He's great though and always effective and rather composed as well. If Chelsea would buy him he'd certainly could make it in the starting line up some years later.There have been no links between Chelsea and him though. Not yet though.I don't think Chelsea has a better youth staff or youth training. Anderlecht is top of europe and won lots of youth tournaments the last years (and had lots of great talents coming trough). We don't have a single youth player on our bench or squad in the average game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I don't think Chelsea has a better youth staff or youth training. Anderlecht is top of europe and won lots of youth tournaments the last years (and had lots of great talents coming trough). We don't have a single youth player on our bench or squad in the average game. Are you seriously comparing Anderlecht to Chelsea or the Belgium league to the Premier League? Anderlecht have the opportunity to play their young players because their league is that bad. Oostende are probably comparable to MK Dons... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goemaere 131 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Are you seriously comparing Anderlecht to Chelsea or the Belgium league to the Premier League? Anderlecht have the opportunity to play their young players because their league is that bad. Oostende are probably comparable to MK Dons...I'm comparing international youth tournaments. Even if I was comparing PL and BL (which i don't) chelsea only has got terry in its line up as a youth player, which is quite poor. And If we would compare youth players (which is -21 according to the UEFA) anderlecht has bred the better talent pool in my opinion. Januzaj and lukaku (which are Anderlecht youth players) would both be on our bench or XI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I'm comparing international youth tournaments. Even if I was comparing PL and BL (which i don't) chelsea only has got terry in its line up as a youth player, which is quite poor. And If we would compare youth players (which is -21 according to the UEFA) anderlecht has bred the better talent pool in my opinion. Januzaj and lukaku (which are Anderlecht youth players) would both be on our bench or XISo would Chalobah, Ake, Omeruo, Van Aanholt, Piazon, Bertrand, Kalas - None of which would be first team players for Chelsea, because our squad is better than Anderlecht and our league is more competative, I'm still struggling to see your point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goemaere 131 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 So would Chalobah, Ake, Omeruo, Van Aanholt, Piazon, Bertrand, Kalas - None of which would be first team players for Chelsea, because our squad is better than Anderlecht and our league is more competative, I'm still struggling to see your point...euh almost all of those players spend the majority of their developing years 8-15/16 at an other club. Once again my point was anderlechts youth coaches and training is better. I can't even see why this is an issue, ask any scout (see our own piet de visser) who has a better youth system.Edit: Our bench; chelseas bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 euh almost all of those players spend the majority of their developing years 8-15/16 at an other club. Once again my point was anderlechts youth coaches and training is better. I can't even see why this is an issue, ask any scout (see our own piet de visser) who has a better youth system.Edit: Our bench; chelseas bench. Where was Anderlecht in the next gen final last year? I saw four teams in the semi finals and one of them was Chelsea. I didnt see any Anderlecht. I think both clubs have really good youth systems and the only way to know would be a match between our youth teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorando 184 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Anderlecht did win some of the most prestigious international tournaments. Viareggio & Aegon cup for example. They had to play next gen just a couple days after a grueling 8 game Viareggio tournament. even then they were quite unlucky to lose that game. Their academy is after some heavy investments one of the top in europe since a year or 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Anderlecht did win some of the most prestigious international tournaments. Viareggio & Aegon cup for example. They had to play next gen just a couple days after a grueling 8 game Viareggio tournament. even then they were quite unlucky to lose that game. Their academy is after some heavy investments one of the top in europe since a year or 3. And so is Chelsea's. Roman has invested a lot into the youth academy since he's come here - difference is though it's a 100 times easier to break through to the Anderlecht first team than Chelsea's (or any top European club), which in turn obviously means talents get a larger scale of opportunity there. Doesn't necessarily mean their youth academy is better than ours.Players like McEachran and Chalobah would easily start for Anderlecht by now (no disrespect). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Rumours say City are in for him, should cost 6m€.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Rumours say City are in for him, should cost 6m€.. Damn ....... This kid would totally be Chelsea stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Rumours say City are in for him, should cost 6m€..For 6m he is a definite buyIsn't he a CDM? That's perfect for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Rumours say City are in for him, should cost 6m€.. For 6m he is a definite buy Isn't he a CDM? That's perfect for us Yep, CDM, amazing talent. Already in the first team of anderlecht plus only 16 years old. Quite baffling tbh. Kompany style talent in my view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonPride1905 236 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Chalobah. Ake. I'm done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Yep, CDM, amazing talent. Already in the first team of anderlecht plus only 16 years old. Quite baffling tbh. Kompany style talent in my view.Yeah I think he is one of the most promising players in the world right now, atleast in his age group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppi85 110 Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Well I thought why not share this...Scored a stunner as well with his "weaker" left foot http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZKWjuOX3ZUhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yywisUAgLGQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts