Ramadel Falcao, Klaas Jan Huntelaar and Edison Cavani: Do they fit the needs of Chelsea FC?

[OneMoSalah 8,886]

And I supose this is completely OK?

I was actually going to study and do an article worth putting on a newspaper I had even downloaded 14 different games with different levels performances and outcomes from Falcao, Cavani and Lewandoski. I wasnt going to write something out of my mind just for fun.

I am really pissed!

Oh.... you could still do one, I suppose since you've got the 14 different games you could analyse and that you'd write a much better one than mines

Just do it anyway mate

[Spike 12,049]

How about David Villa on loan?

- proven finisher

- experienced

- Spanish

I like the first two points, but I don't believe that the last is sufficient reason to sign someone!

[Strike 7,489]

I like the first two points, but I don't believe that the last is sufficient reason to sign someone!

heheh. yeah. even our Blondie is Spanish.

anyway, David Villa will be an EPIC short-term option for us.

[Sheva. 5,373]

How about David Villa on loan?

- proven finisher

- experienced

- Spanish

He's one of Barcelona's highest paid players, he won't come here especially to take a wage cut.

Plus he's too old anyway.

[TheCount 146]

Cavani fits best, he can link up with play far better then the others, he'll suits the PL more also.

We'll also get him importantly much cheaper then we would of last year and much cheaper then falcao this year.

[Rmpr 8,977]

Oh.... you could still do one, I suppose since you've got the 14 different games you could analyse and that you'd write a much better one than mines

Just do it anyway mate

No, why would TC have two articles of the exact same topic (even if with different aproaches and perspectives)?

I will just delete everything and start thinking of another topic to write about...

Thanks!

[Strike 7,489]

He's one of Barcelona's highest paid players, he won't come here especially to take a wage cut.

Plus he's too old anyway.

on loan

he's having problems currently

[Sheva. 5,373]

on loan

he's having problems currently

Yeah i know you said on loan, but my points still stand.

We will have to pay his wages for the amount of time he's here, and he's still old

[Corner 456]

Yeah i know you said on loan, but my points still stand.

We will have to pay his wages for the amount of time he's here, and he's still old

I don't mind how old he is if we only get him for a year-long loan. Plus, we might be able to make a deal with Barca so that we only pay something like 50% of his wages. Not a bad short-term solution.

[manpe 10,861]

No, why would TC have two articles of the exact same topic (even of with different aproaches and perspectives)?

I will just delete everything and start thinking of another topic to write about...

Thanks!

But they're not exact same topics. This one is about the falcon, edi and huntelaar while yours would be 1/3 different, replacing huntelaar with lewandowski.

[OneMoSalah 8,886]

No, why would TC have two articles of the exact same topic (even of with different aproaches and perspectives)?

I will just delete everything and start thinking of another topic to write about...

Thanks!

Never mind that I've done it, just do it with a few other strikers like you said you were going to do Lewandowski in yours, just include other strikers that have been linked to the club... it won't be the exact same and plus you have videos of the players to analyse so I'm sure yours would be much more in depth than mines...

[Sheva. 5,373]

I don't mind how old he is if we only get him for a year-long loan. Plus, we might be able to make a deal with Barca so that we only pay something like 50% of his wages. Not a bad short-term solution.

They might make a deal with clubs like Arsenal or Swansea, but Chelsea? i'm not so sure. He's not even worth pursuing anymore.

He should have come to Chelsea 3-4 years ago.

[Corner 456]

They might make a deal with clubs like Arsenal or Swansea, but Chelsea? i'm not so sure. He's not even worth pursuing anymore.

He should have come to Chelsea 3-4 years ago.

You could be right, but considering how detrimental to the team an unhappy player can be when he is forced to stay. Maybe that would sway Barca towards making that sort of deal. But obviously, it's all speculation.

We're approaching a transfer window, all we can do it speculate.

[Strike 7,489]

Yeah i know you said on loan, but my points still stand.

We will have to pay his wages for the amount of time he's here, and he's still old

yeah but we might be able to support his wages for 6 months. good option if we get him on a 6 month loan in January. fresh option in attack. no money spent. good enough for top 4 finish. david villa maybe a tad old but he's still got his shooting boots on. could finish the chances created by our playmakers

[Corner 456]

yeah but we might be able to support his wages for 6 months. good option if we get him on a 6 month loan in January. fresh option in attack. no money spent. good enough for top 4 finish. david villa maybe a tad old but he's still got his shooting boots on. could finish the chances created by our playmakers

Can also create chances and link up with play very well. If he does become available for a six month loan, I just hope Chelsea would jump at the opportunity. It seems like a much more sensible option than splashing out on a player in the January transfer window, a player that our next manager might not even want.

[Blue Gino 377]

None of these players will be coming to Chelsea. Just like the over hyped Neymar, Sneijder, and Hulk transfer sagas of the past. Welcome to the new Chelsea. New players who are barely old enough to drink beer and like some guy's dating standards, if you're over 30 you're not my type so you get the boot.

[Shogun 721]

i think Jelavic is better than Torres. stats aside, how many times have we seen torres run at the defenders and lose the ball? how many times have we seen the playmakers put the ball in to see Torres fail to attack it? Jelavic is an instinctive striker who lurks on the shoulder of the defenders and ALWAYS attacks the ball when crossed.

we need a better striker but i don't necessarily agree with those saying we need it in January. the summer , when we have a permanent manager, is the best time to rebuild the squad according to the manager's plans and not Gourlay's, Emenalo's or Roman's

Will you shut up about Jelavic?

Roman might be reading!

[Strike 7,489]

Will you shut up about Jelavic?

Roman might be reading!

haha. no way we'd go for Jelavic. his instincts and poaching abilities are class but it's sadly not a big enough 'name' for Gourlay and Emenalo. on the other hand, they'd spend ridiculous amounts of money if shit players like Mario Gomez was available for a transfer

[Sheva. 5,373]

i think Jelavic is better than Torres. stats aside, how many times have we seen torres run at the defenders and lose the ball? how many times have we seen the playmakers put the ball in to see Torres fail to attack it? Jelavic is an instinctive striker who lurks on the shoulder of the defenders and ALWAYS attacks the ball when crossed.

we need a better striker but i don't necessarily agree with those saying we need it in January. the summer , when we have a permanent manager, is the best time to rebuild the squad according to the manager's plans and not Gourlay's, Emenalo's or Roman's

Jelavic has 1 in 6 games and only 6 goals this season. Torres has more while playing badly almost every game.

Thank god you said "stats aside"

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

Give me Someone...