YouNameIt 1,511 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 LOOOOOOLIt is incridible how people moan about Sturridge! Because? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Because?Because what?Because he was unhappy and 12m is a good money for him? Because Ba is a better player? Because we will buy Falcao/Cavani in the summer? Because we still have Torres and Lukaku (like it or not)? Because he has a shit atitude? Because he wants to be the center of attention that wont happen at Chelsea? Etc... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrippingStep 336 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 LOOOOOOLIt is incridible how people moan about Sturridge! We have Torres.And I would have liked to see him play more.I bet that he would have connected well with Hazard on the pitch the more they would have played together.Sturridge has good runs off the ball and is not as pathetic as Gervinho in the link-up play. The special play of Lille was Hazard moving some defenders and releasing the ball in the space created to Gervinho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusek 2,031 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Kinda pissed to see him score, why we ever let him go!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Oh not this stuff again.On a positive note I seen Duff put in a world class cross yesterday, we made a mistake letting him go............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Because what?Because he was unhappy and 12m is a good money for him? Because Ba is a better player? Because we will buy Falcao/Cavani in the summer? Because we still have Torres and Lukaku (like it or not)? Because he has a shit atitude? Because he wants to be the center of attention that wont happen at Chelsea? Etc...OF COURSE he was unhappy. Use your brain. Hes a young talentful striker who didnt get to play. How the fuck was he supposed to be happy?We have torres? Are u actually using that as an arguement? Danny is twice as good as Torres.ANd you dont know fucking shit about his attitude. Thats just something random made up by haters like yourself.Get a clue son Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 OF COURSE he was unhappy. Use your brain. Hes a young talentful striker who didnt get to play. How the fuck was he supposed to be happy?We have torres? Are u actually using that as an arguement? Danny is twice as good as Torres.ANd you dont know fucking shit about his attitude. Thats just something random made up by haters like yourself.Get a clue sonLOOOLYeah, like I was discussing the reasons for him being unhappy! I was stating the facts that made us sell him smartass, not why they happened nor if they were fair or not.Stop looking for fights with any member that disagrees with you. Just continue with your clairvoyance shit and be quite... The only place to be 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyblue 443 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Wayne Bridge is having a fantastic season at Brighton. The Chelsea board are a bunch of idiots Leif 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 LOOOLYeah, like I was discussing the reasons for him being unhappy! I was stating the facts that made us sell him smartass, not why they happened nor if they were fair.Stop looking for fights with any member that disagrees with you. Just continue with your clairvoyance shit and shut up...Oh my god. can you be more ignorant? you are disregarding WHY he was unhappy, which is kinda interesting if you use his unhappyness as an arguement for why he should of/was sold.Fact remains we got rid of an important player and got even more stuck with that blonde piece of shit. An IDIOTIC decision considering we only have him for EL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Oh not this stuff again.On a positive note I seen Damien Duff put in a world class cross yesterday, we made a mistake letting him go............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Las7 951 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Wayne Bridge is having a fantastic season at Brighton. The Chelsea board are a bunch of idiotsWe have A.Cole and Ryan as left backs, while up top we have a big pile of shite for the Europa League and god forbid any injuries to Ba we are fucked - our board are indeed fucking idiots. BlueJewel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyblue 443 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 We have A.Cole and Ryan as left backs, while up top we have a big pile of shite for the Europa League and god forbid any injuries to Ba we are fucked - our board are indeed fucking idiots. Yeah we have Ba as a first choice who's been one of the best strikers in England since coming to the country and Torres who despite being shit has got 15 goals this season and is good enough to be a back up striker (even if you don't like him). We also have Lukaku out on loan who's starting to blossom and are likely to sign Falcao or Cavani in summer. Not to mention young Feruz who's been scoring for fun in the youth teams SinineUltra 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! JDY 1,290 Posted February 3, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted February 3, 2013 Hate the comments like 'OmGz iz dis thead gona be bumped evry tiime sturridg£ scoreZz?!'It should be bumped as a reminder of what a bad decision it was. The lad has tons of potential, and he didn't even get much of a chance. By the club and the majority of the fans that is. £12m is a lot of money for him, but he could easily be worth double that. YouNameIt, super_frank8, The Skipper and 5 others 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Yeah we have Ba as a first choice who's been one of the best strikers in England since coming to the country and Torres who despite being shit has got 15 goals this season and is good enough to be a back up striker (even if you don't like him). We also have Lukaku out on loan who's starting to blossom and are likely to sign Falcao or Cavani in summer. Not to mention young Feruz who's been scoring for fun in the youth teamsYeah for Leeds maybe...EDIT: a 50m back-up striker who gets what, 170k a week? Mmmmm LOVELY INNITAnd you guys celebrate about the shitty 12m we got for Danny....hahaha BlueJewel and The Mak 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyblue 443 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Yeah for Leeds maybe...EDIT: a 50m back-up striker who gets what, 170k a week? Mmmmm LOVELY INNITYeah ignore the games against Newcastle, Shakhtar etc. Like him or not torres is good enough to be a striker option for us. He's just not good enough to be a starting striker. Sturridge is gone now, there's nothing we can do. We should be fine in the striker department long term. We got Ba in who's a better striker and have a better striker prospect in our ranks. Players like Drogba and Anelka gave us trophies while Sturridge gave us inconsistency for a year, yet you don't see half the moaning for them being sold. That's what annoys me. Our reaction to Sturridge going is like what Arsenal's with RVP has been, but at least there's is justified considered he's been sold to a rival and is the best striker on the planet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Our reaction to Sturridge going is like what Arsenal's with RVP has been, but at least there's is justified considered he's been sold to a rival and is the best striker on the planetThis is a figment on your imagination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyblue 443 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 This is a figment on your imagination.Don't believe me? Look at the reaction on here. Look at the reaction on twitter whenever he scores goals. I was at the Newcastle game and a few people on the train who came to the game with me were having a massive moan about it.'The Chelsea board are bunch of fuckers' = 'Wenger and Gazidis are clueless''We got rid of Sturridge and kept the spanish donkey' = 'We sold Rvp and bought bloody Giroud'I could carry on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Yeah ignore the games against Newcastle, Shakhtar etc. Like him or not torres is good enough to be a striker option for us. He's just not good enough to be a starting striker. Sturridge is gone now, there's nothing we can do. We should be fine in the striker department long term. We got Ba in who's a better striker and have a better striker prospect in our ranks. Players like Drogba and Anelka gave us trophies while Sturridge gave us inconsistency for a year, yet you don't see half the moaning for them being sold. That's what annoys me. Our reaction to Sturridge going is like what Arsenal's with RVP has been, but at least there's is justified considered he's been sold to a rival and is the best striker on the planetYou dont understand what Im saying. Im saying we would be better off selling Torres for ONE SINGLE EURO and keep Danny.And no, we are definatley not fine in the striker department and ABSOLUTLEY not long term. That just shows how little you know. Torres isnt good enough for us as a second striker. He has a weak personality, we saw that when Drogba was still in Chelsea. Torres HAS to go.Danny gave us inconsistency? You are just talking out of nothing. Just look at when he was a regular winger. He scored lots of goals, important ones, and he was very effective very often. DESPITE PLAYING OUT OF POSITION. And say what you want about him, just look at how he's played in Liverpool. He is getting regular playtime in a prefered position. Its not strange he is better.Its the same situation as with Lukaku. Many wrote him off when he played for us, he had a poor touch etc... Well he hardly got any playtime and when he got 5mins everyone expected a Drogba-finals-performance. Just look at him now.And regarding the RVP comparision, again you are just throwing stuff out there. Clearly clueless... The Mak, Las7 and super_frank8 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Las7 951 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 People calling Sturridge inconsistent on the wing, should rewatch Ba's second half of last season on the wing(when Cisse was signed and played centrally). Simply put some strikers need to be played as such and not be shunned on the wing if you want them to be effective. Muzchap, BlueJewel and Blue Armour 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 You dont understand what Im saying. Im saying we would be better off selling Torres for ONE SINGLE EURO and keep Danny.And no, we are definatley not fine in the striker department and ABSOLUTLEY not long term. That just shows how little you know. Torres isnt good enough for us as a second striker. He has a weak personality, we saw that when Drogba was still in Chelsea. Torres HAS to go.Danny gave us inconsistency? You are just talking out of nothing. Just look at when he was a regular winger. He scored lots of goals, important ones, and he was very effective very often. DESPITE PLAYING OUT OF POSITION. And say what you want about him, just look at how he's played in Liverpool. He is getting regular playtime in a prefered position. Its not strange he is better.Its the same situation as with Lukaku. Many wrote him off when he played for us, he had a poor touch etc... Well he hardly got any playtime and when he got 5mins everyone expected a Drogba-finals-performance. Just look at him now.And regarding the RVP comparision, again you are just throwing stuff out there. Clearly clueless...You dont understand what Im saying. Im saying we would be better off selling Torres for ONE SINGLE EURO and keep Danny.And no, we are definatley not fine in the striker department and ABSOLUTLEY not long term. That just shows how little you know. Torres isnt good enough for us as a second striker. He has a weak personality, we saw that when Drogba was still in Chelsea. Torres HAS to go.Danny gave us inconsistency? You are just talking out of nothing. Just look at when he was a regular winger. He scored lots of goals, important ones, and he was very effective very often. DESPITE PLAYING OUT OF POSITION. And say what you want about him, just look at how he's played in Liverpool. He is getting regular playtime in a prefered position. Its not strange he is better.Its the same situation as with Lukaku. Many wrote him off when he played for us, he had a poor touch etc... Well he hardly got any playtime and when he got 5mins everyone expected a Drogba-finals-performance. Just look at him now.And regarding the RVP comparision, again you are just throwing stuff out there. Clearly clueless...You really need to stop with the constant insults to decent supporters. You don't seem to be able to post without doing so.And can we get away from this notion that we simply decided to keep Torres and sell Sturridge. Sturridge's contract was expiring and there were people willing to pay double what we paid for him. That simply isn't the case with Torres (as far as I know). Rmpr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.