Jump to content

Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think because his game is not flashy and sometimes he looks very slow and weak.

But his game is really2 effective

I always catch myself asking how is this guy so productive? Small, slow, and doesn't really dribble past players. But time n time Mata finds a way to be the best player on the pitch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before saying that Mata is better than Hazard, lets wait until Mata shows up against good aggressive/physical sides.

Did you watch any games at all last season? Let's just forget his performances against Tottenham, United and Arsenal (all who play high pressure football) shall we. Yes okay, he didn't really have good games against Man City but to say Mata wasn't better than Hazard last season overall is ridiculous in my opinion.

Hazard definitely had the better ending towards the season but overall Mata was definitely our best player.

Like I said before, people love writing Mata off. We really are way too spoilt. He was the best number 10 in the world last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think saying his performance was 'just ok' is very, very wrong. He had a great start and a fantastic season ending. The intermediate period - 2 months + suspended time - he was on and off ok to good.

Saying he had a 'just ok' season is quite unintelligible, i think - especially in his first PL year.

Let's see this comparison with our finest - Mata. It clearly shows Hazards impact in his maiden year.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1622506-juan-mata-vs-eden-hazard-revealing-stats-to-separate-the-chelsea-pair

If you go further and compare the performances scores on Whoscored

Hazard: 7.31

Mata: 7.24

Oscar: 7.00

Lampard: 7.06

So ..... Hazard does have a huge, huge ceiling, which may tempt you to say he was just ok .... But i find it very harsh and unfounded.

I apologize if I offend you but I still stand by what I said. For a player as talented as hazard he need to produce more. He needs to be the best player on the pitch every game. I want him to produce more key moments especially in big games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before saying that Mata is better than Hazard, lets wait until Mata shows up against good aggressive/physical sides.

lol, maybe you forget to realize Eden has never out performed Mata in any of our big games. Remember the Totenham game? or the united games? Just because Mata might struggle against more physical teams doesn't mean we should hold our praises for him. lets see Eden go a season without looking average for 1/2 of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I apologize if I offend you but I still stand by what I said. For a player as talented as hazard he need to produce more. He needs to be the best player on the pitch every game. I want him to produce more key moments especially in big games.

Lol!! No need for apology, mate :-) it is just debating.

I just feel you have crazy high standards. If you want him to be the best all the time creating key moments galore in his first EPL season being 21 at that time ....

Not even Messi, Ronaldo did that ... so I believe your benchmark for your claim he did just ok is way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol.Other Teams (United,Arsenal,etc.)would welcome a number 10 like Mata with open arms and some Chelsea Fans think he is sooo bad because he is slow,can´t skip past players and so on.One of Mata´s strenghts is vision,which he has shown often enough in the last two years at this club.Pace on the other hand isn´t a big criteria for a playmaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed it's usually a few Belgium posters that slag off players to prop up their compatriots.

It's not right to only credit that to the Belgium posters.

I've seen English, Spanish, Brazilian,Nigerian and other posters slag off players to prop their compatriots.

To be clear i completely disagree with the guy who started this Mata vs Hazard discussion but you shouldn't say that it's usually the Belgian posters that are starting this stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not right to only credit that to the Belgium posters.

I've seen English, Spanish, Brazilian,Nigerian and other posters slag off players to prop their compatriots.

To be clear i completely disagree with the guy who started this Mata vs Hazard discussion but you shouldn't say that it's usually the Belgian posters that are starting this stuff.

That's why I said "a few" rather than tarring all the Belgians with the same brush. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed it's usually a few Belgium posters that slag off players to prop up their compatriots.

and nigerians who keep promoting mikel.

The reason is that a lot of these fans are chelsea supporters because of these players only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I said "a few" rather than tarring all the Belgians with the same brush. ;)

Thats cherry picking mate. There are much more other nationalities having a go at Mata than belgians. Just check the Mata thread and the unpopular opinions.

Then come and tell me which belgians do this to further their compatriots. You will see your argument is based on loose sand. Let's see some facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You