Jump to content

Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

We've seen him play #10, among the 3 creative players we have, Eden is the worse #10 of the 3. He's way better roaming around the left.

The 3 first games of the epl competition he played 10. He sucked really bad then, didn't he :-) what were the stats again? All motm, couple of assists and goals? I think you saw something different than I did. So please refrain from using 'we' in your post :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3 first games of the epl competition he played 10. He sucked really bad then, didn't he :-) what were the stats again? All motm, couple of assists and goals? I think you saw something different than I did. So please refrain from using 'we' in your post :-)

Though Hazard may have started in the No.10 position earlier this season, he did not just play there permanently. He was constantly rotating position with Mata and then later Oscar as well. And just because he had those number of assists then, it doesn't mean his best position is or he excels in the No.10 position.

Lets break down how we got some of those goals in the first 3 league matches because of Hazard.

vs Wigan (won 2-0)

First goal came from when Hazard found himself in the No.10 to setup Ivanovic on the counter. So, ok. Then the next goal, he found himself out wide making the driving runs and dribbling into the penalty box. He wanted to get to the byline but was tackled by Ramies and we got the penalty.

vs Reading (won 4-2)

Again, we got the penalty similarly to how we got it against Wigan. Made a driving run into the penalty box from the left flank. Does some flicks and tricks before winning the penalty for us. He then assisted Cahill's goal by cutting inside from the left flank by just passing it to him to shoot from distance. His assist for Ivanovic at the end was irrelevant in any way given we caught Reading on the counter when they were desperately searching for the equalizer.

vs Newcastle (won 2-0)

His assist for Torres came when he found himself in the No.10 position in a tight area surrounded by Newcastle players.

So, as you can see, not all his assists came when he was playing in the No.10 position. Some came when playing out wide and some through the middle. He's probably just as effective in the No.10 role as he does out wide, if not better in the latter position.

While Hazard may have the vision and ability to pick out a pass, playing him in the No.10 role would just be wasting him. His main strength is getting on the ball, dribble and running at players in fast pace. He's not going to get that kind of time and space to do that in the middle but only out wide on either flanks and we can already see the impact he can have in that position when he runs at players.

Would be better playing players in positions where their abilities are best utilized rather than putting square pegs in round holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though Hazard may have started in the No.10 position earlier this season, he did not just play there permanently. He was constantly rotating position with Mata and then later Oscar as well. And just because he had those number of assists then, it doesn't mean his best position is or he excels in the No.10 position.

Lets break down how we got some of those goals in the first 3 league matches because of Hazard.

vs Wigan (won 2-0)

First goal came from when Hazard found himself in the No.10 to setup Ivanovic on the counter. So, ok. Then the next goal, he found himself out wide making the driving runs and dribbling into the penalty box. He wanted to get to the byline but was tackled by Ramies and we got the penalty.

vs Reading (won 4-2)

Again, we got the penalty similarly to how we got it against Wigan. Made a driving run into the penalty box from the left flank. Does some flicks and tricks before winning the penalty for us. He then assisted Cahill's goal by cutting inside from the left flank by just passing it to him to shoot from distance. His assist for Ivanovic at the end was irrelevant in any way given we caught Reading on the counter when they were desperately searching for the equalizer.

vs Newcastle (won 2-0)

His assist for Torres came when he found himself in the No.10 position in a tight area surrounded by Newcastle players.

So, as you can see, not all his assists came when he was playing in the No.10 position. Some came when playing out wide and some through the middle. He's probably just as effective in the No.10 role as he does out wide, if not better in the latter position.

While Hazard may have the vision and ability to pick out a pass, playing him in the No.10 role would just be wasting him. His main strength is getting on the ball, dribble and running at players in fast pace. He's not going to get that kind of time and space to do that in the middle but only out wide on either flanks and we can already see the impact he can have in that position when he runs at players.

Would be better playing players in positions where their abilities are best utilized rather than putting square pegs in round holes.

A nr 10 gets on the ball a lot more often then a winger. Dribbling in tight spaces wouldn't be a problem with his close ball control, first touch, low centre of gravity and excellent acceleration. He's built for playing in tight spaces.

1 thing he needs to have to be great at the nr 10 spot is a deep lying playmaker playing behind him to take care of the distribution and to find him in those tight spaces.

I do believe his best position is the nr 10 spot. At Lille they changed their shape to 4-2-3-1 and put him behind the striker with a target man. in 5 games he scores 5 times and assisted 5 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hazard was only ever going to be a short-term signing anyway. Regardless of success here, he strikes me as the sort of guy who wants to play for the very best, just like CR7. When we signed him I could only see him staying here for 2-3 years, using the Chelsea experience as a springboard, before moving to one of Europe's truly big clubs; ie. Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern, Juventus, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though Hazard may have started in the No.10 position earlier this season, he did not just play there permanently. He was constantly rotating position with Mata and then later Oscar as well. And just because he had those number of assists then, it doesn't mean his best position is or he excels in the No.10 position.

Lets break down how we got some of those goals in the first 3 league matches because of Hazard.

vs Wigan (won 2-0)

First goal came from when Hazard found himself in the No.10 to setup Ivanovic on the counter. So, ok. Then the next goal, he found himself out wide making the driving runs and dribbling into the penalty box. He wanted to get to the byline but was tackled by Ramies and we got the penalty.

vs Reading (won 4-2)

Again, we got the penalty similarly to how we got it against Wigan. Made a driving run into the penalty box from the left flank. Does some flicks and tricks before winning the penalty for us. He then assisted Cahill's goal by cutting inside from the left flank by just passing it to him to shoot from distance. His assist for Ivanovic at the end was irrelevant in any way given we caught Reading on the counter when they were desperately searching for the equalizer.

vs Newcastle (won 2-0)

His assist for Torres came when he found himself in the No.10 position in a tight area surrounded by Newcastle players.

So, as you can see, not all his assists came when he was playing in the No.10 position. Some came when playing out wide and some through the middle. He's probably just as effective in the No.10 role as he does out wide, if not better in the latter position.

While Hazard may have the vision and ability to pick out a pass, playing him in the No.10 role would just be wasting him. His main strength is getting on the ball, dribble and running at players in fast pace. He's not going to get that kind of time and space to do that in the middle but only out wide on either flanks and we can already see the impact he can have in that position when he runs at players.

Would be better playing players in positions where their abilities are best utilized rather than putting square pegs in round holes.

Aaah finally a post with actual content. Thanks for that and: good point you made! Still, I agree with belgiannutt because I followed him at Lille as well. He really performed as a 10 there. His playing style there actually kind of illustrates your point: he simply moves a lot around the pitch, even as a 10. He did that there as well. Here, the combo Mata/Hazard taking turns on the 10 with a lot of movement is -in my eyes- best for both of them. They do bring out the best in themselves when playing closely aligned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The club is an absolute shambles at the moment with everything that's going on. Do you think he thinks he deserves to be at a club like this?

What an horrible way to look at the situation. Have you ever thought about that maybe he's one of the reasons we are in this mess? Same goes for every player at the club. He has played the most minutes from our attackers and that's what he was after when he got his transfers. Now it's time to step it up and show some consistency with the whole team in order to get our season back on track.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever someone says that they think Hazards will move to Real Madrid or whatever cock club they can think of I snap the neck of a cute little kitten. So let's just say that the RSPCA have me blacklisted.

If it's said for Hazard it may as well be said for Oscar, Mata, Azpilicueta, Luiz, De Bruyne, Courtois, et al.


Why is it only Hazard people carry on about leaving? Why don't they get paranoid about Oscar leaving?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever someone says that they think Hazards will move to Real Madrid or whatever cock club they can think of I snap the neck of a cute little kitten. So let's just say that the RSPCA have me blacklisted.

If it's said for Hazard it may as well be said for Oscar, Mata, Azpilicueta, Luiz, De Bruyne, Courtois, et al.

Why is it only Hazard people carry on about leaving? Why don't they get paranoid about Oscar leaving?

Because Oscar may have a good shot on fifa but he damn sure cant bend it in the back of the net like Sultan Hazard.

Ps; belgen ik ouwehoer met jullie niet eng doen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You