Jump to content

Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

Read above ^

Hazard can play on the wing, but is not a natural winger, just google "Eden Hazard Position" and you'll see and by putting him on the other wing (if its the right your referring to) then your suggesting taking Sturridge off?

Sorry to disapoint you but i follow the French league and Hazard is a pure Winger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to disapoint you but i follow the French league and Hazard is a pure Winger

Still going to have to disagree, I'm sure you've got your reasons for thinking so, but I've also got mine so I can't really see the point in debating it, you can scour the internet if you like but I'm fairly certain you'll come across him being listed as both or either.

Just because he plays on the wing doesn't make him a winger, same as Mata.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still going to have to disagree, I'm sure you've got your reasons for thinking so, but I've also got mine so I can't really see the point in debating it, you can scour the internet if you like but I'm fairly certain you'll come across him being listed as both or either.

Just because he plays on the wing doesn't make him a winger, same as Mata.

you cant compare Mata and Hazard, both are very technical yes but Mata is more of a Passer and Playmaker while Hazard is a Dribbler with PACE something Mata has not got but i respect your opinion :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you cant compare Mata and Hazard, both are very technical yes but Mata is more of a Passer and Playmaker while Hazard is a Dribbler with PACE something Mata has not got but i respect your opinion :)

Much appreciated! This could go on for quite a while so lets say he can do either, which is true!

But if he was to come to Stamford bridge where would he play? In our 4-3-3 we have two established wingers their pretty much the only constant feature of the team this season so far, Matas been pulling the strings and orchestrating the play and Dannys been banging in the goals and practically leading the line by himself so, again, where would he fit in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much appreciated! This could go on for quite a while so lets say he can do either, which is true!

But if he was to come to Stamford bridge where would he play? In our 4-3-3 we have two established wingers their pretty much the only constant feature of the team this season so far, Matas been pulling the strings and orchestrating the play and Dannys been banging in the goals and practically leading the line by himself so, again, where would he fit in?

I would line up like this:

----Ramires---Oriol/Essien----

Sturridge--Mata--Hazard

-------------Torres-----------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would line up like this:

----Ramires---Oriol/Essien----

Sturridge--Mata--Hazard

-------------Torres-----------

Same as everyone keeps saying and its a bloody good idea im not arguing that but AVB has played a 4-3-3 his whole managerial career and we've been playing 4-3-3 since Mourhinio and I can't see us changing formation halfway through the season because its probably going to lead to very disjointed performances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same as everyone keeps saying and its a bloody good idea im not arguing that but AVB has played a 4-3-3 his whole managerial career and we've been playing 4-3-3 since Mourhinio and I can't see us changing formation halfway through the season because its probably going to lead to very disjointed performances

We have often switched to 4-2-3-1 during games if you hadnt noticed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He always says that. If he then says "he's an interesting player" yada, yada, yada - then we know something happening.

If there had been a bid then he would have said "he's an interesting player" or something along those lines...

He's very frank in his interviews. If he says the club hasn't made an approach then its very likely they haven't considered signing Hazard yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have often switched to 4-2-3-1 during games if you hadnt noticed

We've switched into quite a few different formations when need be, but changing the whole squads playing philosophy in the middle of the season? I just can't see it happening personally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You