Jump to content

🇧🇪 Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

People see what they want to see. That's why you're getting so many headlines about him kicking the ball boy when it seems pretty clear that he kicks the ball from under him. Should he have done it? Probably not, but Eden was trying to get on with the game and win it for us. He showed a bit of passion that was missing from so many other players' performances last night and some little shit was on a mission to slow the game down.

I'm never going to criticise a Chelsea player for caring too much about the performance and trying to get the win, especially when I don't think he's done much wrong. Honestly, I don't give a fuck how bad it looks on tv or how bad a PR disaster it is because I want players to play for the badge and give their all. That's what used to count to supporters of this club, not how shit affects the sales of fucking lunchboxes with Hazard's face on them.

It is not about the sales (they do count though), but it is about the conseguences being way more harmful than a supposed gain of 1-2 minutes in an already lost match.

The funny thing is that you wanted us to play with a mixed or reserve team not to affect more important EPL matches before the game, wasnt it? Now, you are not only OK with the bans Hazard will get, but you agree with it.

You are entitled to your opinion and I am done discussing this shit. Just dont think you are a better fan because you chose to protect Hazard and I chose to see that everyone was wrong in the whole situation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are missing the point there are no victms and villans. Everyone did something they werent supposed to, they all have their blame percentage (Foy, Faggot, Hazard, FA, Fans, Williams, etc). It is not about one being right and the other wrong....

I agree with most of what you said, it is just that I think there are more ways to see it than through Hazard's or Faggot's eyes. A neutral one that can see Hazard shouldnt have done that, but the "kid" was a cunt as well.

I only wanted to point that out, do not really want a discussion out of this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a feeling the club won't even appeal against the red card to be honest. Can somehow see that making things even worse. Take the ban, move on and forget about it. He did nothing wrong as far as i'm concerned, just the usual sensationalist media that goes along with Chelsea FC. There is absolutely no need for the FA to get involved, although they undoubtedly will. Hopefully they use some common sense for once.

At the moment, he'll miss Brentford, Reading and Newcastle. Not the worst 3 games he could've missed either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, this has become a bit of a farce, and as someone has said "mountain out of a molehill". The FA should recind the red card, but you can bet your house that they won't. I think if anything he is more likely to get a longer ban, but will be "saved" by what the bloke (not calling him a kid anymore) wrote on twitter about him being a ball boy there #needfortimewasting.

And adrian Durham... Glad to see he is saying the truth. I do like talksport, except the likes of stan colleymore who really piss me off (but that is besides the point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 game ban would mean he'd miss City away.

It depends on the FA Cup. At the moment there are 4 games before the City game (Brentford, Reading, Newcastle, Wigan).

If we beat Brentford then we have a Fifth Round game before then (5 games).

If we have a replay against Brentford, we have a 6 games between now and the City game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a 3 match ban is adequate maybe even 4 but nothing more than that. Hopefully the FA would feel the same...one can only hope. I also agree that Swansea should be fined it is plain to see that the ballboys were instructed to waste time.

I think the club should change its name to drama FC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about Swansea getting some kind of punishment as well? It was their retarded ball boy that caused the controversy after all.

How about a simple message like 'the lad made a mistake' or 'we will make our own conclusions', anything! Nothing. Instead, the little bitch is defended by the Swans board.

"The boy went to pick up the ball and he fell over. He didn't hold on to the ball for a minute; it happened over about 20 seconds," said Dineen.

FELL OVER?? He did it on fucking purpose! Enough said, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm at work - what's he saying mate?

The ball boy, is everything wrong with society today. Hazard isn't in the wrong. Disgraceful, swansea deserved to win. But expanding on what he wrote on his section on the daily mail, which i think smeone posted on page 180 of this thread.

"He played the ball, Never a foul" :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...