Jump to content

Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

My mate Hassan just sent me this;

France occupied Algeria for 132 years. They killed 1 million Muslims in the first 7 years.

and 1 million 500 000 in the last seven years before they left.

French historian Jacques Gorky has estimated that the total killed by France in Algeria since its arrival in 1830 until 1962 is 10 million Muslims.

France occupied Tunisia for 75 years, Algeria 132 years, Morroco 44 years, Mauretania 60 years and Senegal 120 years.

Yes, but were they killed simply because they were Muslims or were they killed because they stood in the way of the French taking advantage of the nation's wealth and nature resources? Was it inspired purely by theological reasons or did the French see an opportunity to take advantage of a group of people that had less wealth, resources and weapons then them? I think throughout history leaders have used religion, race and culture as a means to justify taking advantage of the weak. The motivation isn't due to xenophobia but due to a lust for power and exertion of will over the weak. Relgion, race and culture is a just a smokescreen used by the powers that be to justify their lust for power to the hoi polloi. It is much easier for the masses to accept an 'us vs. them' agenda over simply 'let's kill these people and take their stuff so I can personally fill my coffers with blooded bars of gold'. Well, this is how I feel this is the reason events in the last 200 years or so have been perpetrated. Specifically colonialisation; not for and ideology but for a profit. A tragedy both ways but the motivations are very different.

Even the original Crusade wan't entirely motivated by a theological desire to control the Holy Lands. I've read that knights when not at war have nothing to do, soldiers without a casus belli to fight for tend to fight amongst themselves. Barons fight Earls, Counts fight Viscounts, et al. The Crusades were a clever reason to stop Europe's rowdy nobility from infighting and bandy them together against a common enemy, easing tensions in Europe. The Muslims of the Levant. Not to mention this was a nice way to introduce many treasures into Europe by robbing the Islamic nobility of the Levant. Hehe, there is always cash to be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but were they killed simply because they were Muslims or were they killed because they stood in the way of the French taking advantage of the nation's wealth and nature resources? Was it inspired purely by theological reasons or did the French see an opportunity to take advantage of a group of people that had less wealth, resources and weapons then them? I think throughout history leaders have used religion, race and culture as a means to justify taking advantage of the weak. The motivation isn't due to xenophobia but due to a lust for power and exertion of will over the weak. Relgion, race and culture is a just a smokescreen used by the powers that be to justify their lust for power to the hoi polloi. It is much easier for the masses to accept an 'us vs. them' agenda over simply 'let's kill these people and take their stuff so I can personally fill my coffers with blooded bars of gold'. Well, this is how I feel this is the reason events in the last 200 years or so have been perpetrated. Specifically colonialisation; not for and ideology but for a profit. A tragedy both ways but the motivations are very different.

Even the original Crusade wan't entirely motivated by a theological desire to control the Holy Lands. I've read that knights when not at war have nothing to do, soldiers without a casus belli to fight for tend to fight amongst themselves. Barons fight Earls, Counts fight Viscounts, et al. The Crusades were a clever reason to stop Europe's rowdy nobility from infighting and bandy them together against a common enemy, easing tensions in Europe. The Muslims of the Levant. Not to mention this was a nice way to introduce many treasures into Europe by robbing the Islamic nobility of the Levant. Hehe, there is always cash to be made.

Yeah , unfortunately that 'cash to be made' comes with a heavy price. Initial blood and then subsequent'terrorism'. If Muslims are looking for resonance from colonolisation and being wiped out by colonial powers, I dont think they will stop and think it was only because of a wealth grab or whether it was theological. The justification of crusades and things like the British Empire was sewn with Social Darwinism. Latter day US troops refer to arabs as 'Sandniggers' for example,

I agree with you that material gain is the drive for most invasions, subterfuge, etc. If we check out Genie Oil for example, who are buying oil from ISIS. They have an interesting list of 'strategists and major share holders.

http://genieoilgas.com/about-us/strategic-advisory-board/

When you look at that list, Cheney for example the main architect beneficiary for Iraqs destruction, it becomes clear why certain very powerful interests, Gulf States included, want to keep ISIS hanging about. The real acid test though is the countries opposed to ISIS with a concerted effort, and all that hi tech firepower, could wipe out the whole organisation is less than 48 hours

The whole issue of 'realpolitik' has always been played out against a backdrop of self interest. We went into Iraq on the coat tails of American colonialism/self interest(outside the jurisdiction of that neutered organisation the UN). The UN is now nothing more than a talking shop -for the exact reason that the main players in the UN want it to be ! The G20 talks this week seem to happen outside the orbit of the UNs influence which is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted "YES" in the Scottish referendum. Although many, many years living in London before returning back to the People's Democratic Republic of Glasgow. Most, if not all of my friends are Londoners so the "YES" vote was absolutely not an 'anti-english' thing. I believe in self determination and, what should be, our destiny to go it alone.

That's the diplomatic version, above anything else, may I take this opportunity to put on record that I absofuckinglutely despise the Conservative Party. I would rather eat my own shit than give them a minute of my time. I would never, ever tire of slapping Cameron, Gideon, IDS, Hague, etc. Bunch of self serving wank stains of the highest order.

I gave up on Labour a long time ago, after Blair let the whole thing down, then Brown. In Scotland, in May, they got royally fucked off for their pampering to the Tories in the run up to the referendum vote. They are finished in Scotland. But, in Jeremy Corbyn, they have a chance to do something right, something good. He doesn't give a fuck, he don't sing the awful 'God Save The Queen' drivel as he don't believe in either God nor Royalty, so why the fuck should he sing it? That has obviously would up the Tory press, culminating with The Sun digging him out for 'not bowing enough' ffs, Aye, nae bother Murdoch. The Tax avoiding Mail and Telegraph jump on the band wagon.

Corbyn won't think twice about rocking the boat and I admire him for that. The british press are cunts, corrupt, snide cunts.

Power to the People (Right on) <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

website source : https://truthernews.wordpress.com/

CIA Plotting Chinese Missile Strike on Air Force One over South China Sea—Obama Assassination Designed to Spark Nuclear World War III Between US & China

https://truthernews.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/cia-plotting-chinese-missile-strike-on-air-force-one-when-obama-flies-over-south-china-sea-assassination-designed-to-spark-world-war-iii-between-us-china/

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, theSwiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, know this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and B) the CIA has historically not shat where it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

SHOCK: 10 Reasons Why the Paris Terror Attacks Were Executed by the CIA

ISIS ENDGAME: How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

BREAKING NEWS: CERN Is Secret Entrance to Subterranean CIA Headquarters Located Beneath Lake Geneva in Switzerland

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
November 19, 2015
Truther.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turkey have shot down a Russian war plane on the border of Syria after it was violating our airspace...

I heard the plane crashed in Syria.

Does this have anything to do with the fact that Russia bombed thousands of oil tankers in ISIS base some days ago??

From Putin's response, he says they've been stabbed at the back by terrorist associates.

Putin's response:

The loss today is a stab in the back, carried out by the accomplices of terrorists. I cant describe it in any other way.

Do they want to make Nato serve ISIS? ... We hope that the international community will find the strength to come together and fight against the common evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard the plane crashed in Syria.

Does this have anything to do with the fact that Russia bombed thousands of oil tankers in ISIS base some days ago??

From Putin's response, he says they've been stabbed at the back by terrorist associates.

Putin's response:

Rethorical question if you ask me. Of course that's the reason. They're ISIS sympathisants, they buy oil from them. By taking down that plane Turkey now helping ISIS achieve their goal - start the WW3. Russians won't back down, that's a declaration of war. When I first read the news I was praying that's not a Russian airplane, because they were saying "an aircraft of unknown origin". But that's a Russian aircraft indeed. And that is not good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rethorical question if you ask me. Of course that's the reason. They're ISIS sympathisants, they buy oil from them. By taking down that plane Turkey now helping ISIS achieve their goal - start the WW3. Russians won't back down, that's a declaration of war. When I first read the news I was praying that's not a Russian airplane, because they were saying "an aircraft of unknown origin". But that's a Russian aircraft indeed. And that is not good!

Nobody is starting WWIII over Turkey :D

There will be posturing on both sides, and expect a Turkish Airliner to blow up sometime in 2016 mysteriously and that will be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dieudonne M'bala M'bala, the French comedian sentenced to two months imprisonment in Belgium. During his routine he said Jews are scoundrels and the holocaust a myth etc,. Pretty obnoxious stuff, and hes got previous for his anti-semitic stuff -but a prison sentence ?

If we are truly committed to ensuring everyone has the liberty to think and say whatever they please, then the jailing of Dieudonné should outrage us as much as the attempts to shut down Charlie Hebdo or the jailing of a Saudi blogger for ridiculing religious belief. Shouldnt we be saying ‘Je Suis Dieudonné’ ?

Dieudonné has been punished simply for thinking and saying certain things. This is thought-policing. It’s a PC, spat-and-polished version of the Inquisition, which was likewise in the business of raining punishment upon those who said things the authorities considered wicked.

All hate-speech laws should be scrapped. Dieudonné should be freed. And a continent whose governments argue against the imprisonment of bloggers in Saudi Arabia while jailing comedians at home needs to take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Byzantine empire should be recreated.

We Greeks are really the christianized Romans.

Greece or Hellas was a province. The emperors were calling the regions "themata", meaning "subjects". So there was a Hellenic thema, an Ionian thema and a Thracean thema. Strangely there was no Macedonian thema and the Thracean thema extended out to today's Albania - the Illyric thema.
In the revolution of 1821 we had to stop at the borders of Thessaly, as further north the Turks maintained supremacy. In addition the Lord of Wellington did not want anymore revolution. So there could be no new Rome and the free country was named Greece. The blue and white flag was adopted in place of the yellow-black with the Byzantine two headed eagle.

Previously a great setback for Greece was the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte in Waterloo. Napoleon's ancestors were Greek (Bonaparte derives from Kalomeris and in Latin becomes "Bonaparte"). As the great Emperor was not engaged in war with the Ottomans and his strategy was to defeat the English first, he was hiding the facts about his ancestry because the High Gate of Istanbul, the Sultan's palace, might not like it. But in France everybody more or less knew it.

With Turkey now tottering in the brink of collapse, the empire should be recreated, thus ensuring the uninterrupted flow of oil from the middle East to Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You