Popular Post! ANDRECHO 432 Posted February 17, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted February 17, 2013 Kevin de Bruyne VS SC Freiburg 16/02/13 ....BY ANDRECHO ....... Hutcho, Despiadado.Maleante, ja1 and 6 others 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mediator 2,026 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 i like your videos andrecho.Impressive perf from KDB again, a few bad passes but we can see that he is the heart of the bremen midfield Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Would prefer thisAzpi-Terry-Luiz-ColeMata-Wanyama-KdbMoses-Ba?-HazardRambo is just not a type of player we need in midfield im afraid. Wanyama has pace of rambo, power of Mikel and some great offensive/defensive skills like tackling, covering, shot from distance. Mata would be attacking playmaker, while Kdb/Oscar would connect the midfield with attack and both like to work heavy in defensive department.Moses would add the pace on wing and directness that we lack, his game will only rise with experience. Hazard on left is obvious choice. Im not sure about Ba as striker but if we realy want to play Lukaku next season, we MUST NOT buy any class striker because he would then end Lukaku's career here. Azpi and Cole as full backs seem perfect, while another cB will eventualy need to come, as Terry is getting old. Midfeld of Wanyama, Mata and Kdb would give us defensive balance and creative spark in center half. Basicaly we only need someone like Wanyama and we are set for next season.Well I tried to make the lineup of players we already have, but I do like Wanyama. That said, Mata in a 3 man midfield? Why in a million years would you want to do that? Ramires in a 3 man midfield is not the same as Ramires in a double pivot. Ramires > Mata and it's not even close, you'll have no balance if you try defend with a midfield of Mikel, Mata and Oscar/KDB. Mata plays on RW and ramires RCM so Mata doesn't even have to defend and can still roam because you'll have Ramires covering the entire right side of the pitch with ease. In a 4-3-3 Ramires is candidate for our best player. I'd never want to put Mata (our worst defensive player) in the midfield and give him more defensive responsibilities which he can't perform. SinineUltra and Mufassir08 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ja1 1,166 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Would prefer thisAzpi-Terry-Luiz-ColeMata-Wanyama-KdbMoses-Ba?-HazardRambo is just not a type of player we need in midfield im afraid. Wanyama has pace of rambo, power of Mikel and some great offensive/defensive skills like tackling, covering, shot from distance. Mata would be attacking playmaker, while Kdb/Oscar would connect the midfield with attack and both like to work heavy in defensive department.Moses would add the pace on wing and directness that we lack, his game will only rise with experience. Hazard on left is obvious choice. Im not sure about Ba as striker but if we realy want to play Lukaku next season, we MUST NOT buy any class striker because he would then end Lukaku's career here. Azpi and Cole as full backs seem perfect, while another cB will eventualy need to come, as Terry is getting old. Midfeld of Wanyama, Mata and Kdb would give us defensive balance and creative spark in center half. Basicaly we only need someone like Wanyama and we are set for next season.Mata cannot play midfield and ideally we need a better starter than Moses next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Well I tried to make the lineup of players we already have, but I do like Wanyama. That said, Mata in a 3 man midfield? Why in a million years would you want to do that? Ramires in a 3 man midfield is not the same as Ramires in a double pivot. Ramires > Mata and it's not even close, you'll have no balance if you try defend with a midfield of Mikel, Mata and Oscar/KDB. Mata plays on RW and ramires RCM so Mata doesn't even have to defend and can still roam because you'll have Ramires covering the entire right side of the pitch with ease. In a 4-3-3 Ramires is candidate for our best player. I'd never want to put Mata (our worst defensive player) in the midfield and give him more defensive responsibilities which he can't perform.Spot on!In a 4-3-3 formation ramires should be the first name on the team sheet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Well I tried to make the lineup of players we already have, but I do like Wanyama. That said, Mata in a 3 man midfield? Why in a million years would you want to do that? Ramires in a 3 man midfield is not the same as Ramires in a double pivot. Ramires > Mata and it's not even close, you'll have no balance if you try defend with a midfield of Mikel, Mata and Oscar/KDB. Mata plays on RW and ramires RCM so Mata doesn't even have to defend and can still roam because you'll have Ramires covering the entire right side of the pitch with ease. In a 4-3-3 Ramires is candidate for our best player. I'd never want to put Mata (our worst defensive player) in the midfield and give him more defensive responsibilities which he can't perform.Lamps was very offensive playmaker in 4:3:3, why Mata cant do the same?Besides if we had Wanyama, the guy can evolve in next Essien/Yaya and we wouldnt even need two midfielders with strong defensive abilities (Mikel and Rambo). Dont forget that we want to play nice passing football and with Rambo that will never happen. Hes passing and playmaking skills are weak unless you want him use in counter attack formation. If Iniesta can play in three man midfield with xavi and Busquets, I dont see why Mata couldnt. But in that case we obviously need someone more pacy than Mikel in DM (Wanyama for example). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Lamps was very offensive playmaker in 4:3:3, why Mata cant do the same?Besides if we had Wanyama, the guy can evolve in next Essien/Yaya and we wouldnt even need two midfielders with strong defensive abilities (Mikel and Rambo). Dont forget that we want to play nice passing football and with Rambo that will never happen. Hes passing and playmaking skills are weak unless you want him use in counter attack formation. If Iniesta can play in three man midfield with xavi and Busquets, I dont see why Mata couldnt. But in that case we obviously need someone more pacy than Mikel in DM (Wanyama for example).If anybody is going to be the offensive midfielder in the 433 it's going to be Oscar. He is the most suited to being Lampard's replacement in the 433. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Mata cannot play midfield and ideally we need a better starter than Moses next season.He wouldnt be cm, but CAM.Like this---------Wanyama--------------------------Kdb----------Mata-----------------Moses-----Ba-----Hazard-Also, Moses has all potential to be starter, he offers lot of pace and second option in attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Both iniesta and lampard are a lot more hard working have more stamina and are better defenders then mata. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 If anybody is going to be the offensive midfielder in the 433 it's going to be Oscar. He is the most suited to being Lampard's replacement in the 433.What about Kdb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 What about Kdb?Oscar is better than KDB by a very, very long way.I find it amazing seeing all these formations for next season and there's no Oscar. Do people not realise how good he is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Oscar is better than KDB by a very, very long way.I find it amazing seeing all these formations for next season and there's no Oscar. Do people not realise how good he is?You underestimate KDB greatly sir. Stingray 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 You underestimate KDB greatly sir.Not true, I rate Oscar very highly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Both iniesta and lampard are a lot more hard working have more stamina and are better defenders then mata.Well Mata needs to become like them. If he wont have stamina to play regulary day in day out, we will never be good. Only when he will play on top. When he will be tired, we will be shit. You cant have your main man to be so 'weak'. Look at Silva. Top team but when he is shit, whole team play shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keikoismad 162 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Oscar is better than KDB by a very, very long way.I find it amazing seeing all these formations for next season and there's no Oscar. Do people not realise how good he is?No offense, because many people haven't seen him play a lot, but i would like to warn you: KDB is very very very good in his position, imo the greatest Belgian talent together with Courtois and Hazard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.