Jump to content

🇧🇪 Kevin de Bruyne


Madmax
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't get why we have to repeat the same thing over and over again.
Yes, De Bruyne is class, but why isn't there a big discussion going on in the Mata/Schurrle/and so on threads on praising the sellings?
People really like to stick it to some people, only focusing on the negatives, going to bed. Too predictable...:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would also be easier to stomach if our own Belgian star didn't have an abysmal season...

But I 100% guarantee all of you that Oscar will still be lining up next season as our "playmaker." A playmaker that rarely scores, contributes almost no assists, has no creative vision, and has one good game against a random, shit team for every 10 matches he plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, lucio said:

he was motm in his full debut too. but jose knows best. got to build the team around golden boy

This to me shows that Mourinho got a lot of control in transfer. 

Mourinho sold the younger players to get his players that he wanted. And a lot of people say that he didn't get anything he wanted in the transfer window....

This is why I'm not like most that think our board is incompetent and all that. 

In fact I think our board is great, they was doing a great job before the individual came here and screw everything up. And it was great that they realize their mistakes and sack the individual. 

Now they can go back to the deals they was doing before and hopefully Conte will be progress from the individual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Stats said:

I tell you what I remember. KDB impressing in pre-season and then bossed our first game of the season against Hull at a young age. He obivously had 1 bad game after and one gaainst Swindon about couple weeks later but it was clear he had talent from the go. But Mourinho being the person he is and not giving a fuck about the future, made a mistake and it has shot us in the foot. I never wanted him gone because I knew he was going to be a quality player. No other manager would have got rid of him and Lukaku the way Mourinho did. You have to give them game time to prove themselves.

Can you imagine what Mourinho would do if he had the likes of Kane and Alli at his disposal.

I still don't know why we bought Willian if KDB was allegedly in Jose's plans for the season. Was it a board signing vs manager signing type of situation? Maybe we'll never know.

I'm not fairly convinced in the whole "Mourinho never gives youth opportunity" theory. Because there have been exceptions like Robben, Zouma and Varane. I think it has more to do with attitude and egos than age. But that's just me.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Azpinator said:

I still don't know why we bough Willian if KDB was allegedly in Jose's plans for the season. Was it a board signing vs manager signing type of situation? Maybe we'll never know.

I'm not fairly convinced in the whole "Mourinho never gives youth opportunity" theory. Because there have been exceptions like Zouma and Varane. I think it has more to do with attitude and egos than age. But that's just me.
 

zouma cost £12m, and was one of the most hyped players in his position.... and he still made a meal of it, even starting cahill over zouma at the start of the season, no wonder he went on to be sacked, just idiocy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fernando said:

This to me shows that Mourinho got a lot of control in transfer. 

Mourinho sold the younger players to get his players that he wanted. And a lot of people say that he didn't get anything he wanted in the transfer window....

This is why I'm not like most that think our board is incompetent and all that. 

In fact I think our board is great, they was doing a great job before the individual came here and screw everything up. And it was great that they realize their mistakes and sack the individual. 

Now they can go back to the deals they was doing before and hopefully Conte will be progress from the individual. 

Don't know if I'm willing to go that far. Mourinho certainly had a lot of control in his first two seasons, clearly. This past year, though, the board and owner had become obsessed with FFP, balancing the books, and became content with the squad.

We know as fact that Mou wanted a few top class players to improve the team and if things were totally up to him they'd have been signed. The board were either incompetent with some transfers (Stones) or straight up didn't try or left it too late for others. Still place most of the blame on the board myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pizy said:

Don't know if I'm willing to go that far. Mourinho certainly had a lot of control in his first two seasons, clearly. This past year, though, the board and owner had become obsessed with FFP, balancing the books, and became content with the squad.

We know as fact that Mou wanted a few top class players to improve the team and if things were totally up to him they'd have been signed. The board were either incompetent with some transfers (Stones) or straight up didn't try or left it too late for others. Still place most of the blame on the board myself.

Yes and those two years it showed what he was all about, short term glory then building for the future. 

It was good that the board tighten up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Courtois, Hazard, De Bruyne, Lukaku, possibily Nainggolan. Half of Belgium NT. Plus Charly Musonda a full time international in the near future. All this for a fucking title that has done more harm than good. Let that sink in. Mourinho you sick human being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lucio said:

zouma cost £12m, and was one of the most hyped players in his position.... and he still made a meal of it, even starting cahill over zouma at the start of the season, no wonder he went on to be sacked, just idiocy

I think he introduced Zouma to the team properly. Just remember back then, us fans wouldn't be so happy if Zouma just walked in the first team especially if it backfired and we conceded a lot. Cahill was the safer option at the beginning because you want a good start to your season.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fernando said:

Yes and those two years it showed what he was all about, short term glory then building for the future. 

It was good that the board tighten up. 

Let's just pray they aren't so tight in Conte's first summer or we won't sniff the title or even CL football for years and years like Liverpool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kiwi1691 said:

I thought Jose had the option to sign Alli but said no. 

Not sure. I only thought it was out of Liverpool and Spurs. Alli would never have joined under Mourinho anyway. If he did, he would be out on loan or in the U21.

11 minutes ago, petre.ispirescu said:

Courtois, Hazard, De Bruyne, Lukaku, possibily Nainggolan. Half of Belgium NT. Plus Charly Musonda a full time international in the near future. All this for a fucking title that has done more harm than good. Let that sink in. Mourinho you sick human being.

Mourinho leaving might actually give us hope of keeping hold on to Musonda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Essien19 said:

I don't get why we have to repeat the same thing over and over again.
Yes, De Bruyne is class, but why isn't there a big discussion going on in the Mata/Schurrle/and so on threads on praising the sellings?
People really like to stick it to some people, only focusing on the negatives, going to bed. Too predictable...:)

So people who saw his ridiculous talent years before he even played a game for Chelsea can't say I told you so?

Jog on mate :)

This guy could have been our nr10 for years, if not for that idiot Mourinho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Azpinator said:

I think he introduced Zouma to the team properly. Just remember back then, us fans wouldn't be so happy if Zouma just walked in the first team especially if it backfired and we conceded a lot. Cahill was the safer option at the beginning because you want a good start to your season.
 

I dont know if you remember Cahill's performances in 14/15, but they were absolutely awful. Imo his run of horrible performances was longer than Ivanovic's this season. I still think Mourinho's persistence with Cahill was as bad as his persistence with Ivanovic. Just goes to show how much it takes for him to give a proper chance to one of the best young centre backs around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...