kellzfresh 7,229 Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 The elephant in the room is that both he and Silva look like worse players when playing together.....I think mancity is better off with only one of them in the middle and Sterling and navas on the wings. Sir Mikel OBE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Kevin De Bruyne agreed to join Bayern Munich before Manchester City move, says agent http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11679/10128154/kevin-de-bruyne-agreed-to-join-bayern-munich-before-manchester-city-move-says-agent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilvorak 3,734 Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 Why is he so poor in big/away games? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 What an impact. Comes on and gets a goal and assist within the space of 10 minutes. Only posted this because I fear he has got a bad injury and think it is one that could keep him out for months. Will be a real shame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesman2610 1,417 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Tough Luck for Kevin.. Hopefully it's not too serious an injury! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Looked bad, few days left in the window I'm sure they can go and spend 50M if he's out for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledg 643 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 By the looks of it he can easily be out for the rest of the season. Feel sorry for the lad. Great player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Looked nasty, hopefully looks worse than it is. Instant impact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Heard that he's our for 6 months... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 45 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said: Heard that he's our for 6 months... 6 weeks Sir Mikel OBE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Mikel OBE 4,920 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 6 weeks isn't that bad all things considered. Will probably just be getting back to his fitness level for the premier league run in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 When do we play the'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 he will actually be out 10 weeks. Get well soon Kev! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 20 hours ago, Hamilton said: When do we play the'? 16 aprl, so it will a close call for him to be fit then, probably not. He will be for the euro's hopefully  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,072 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 On 21/02/2016 at 3:45 PM, MCM4PR3Z said: Of the 4 months he was fit, 3 times player of the month. His statistics are even better than at Wolfsburg. He plays there for half a season and he has never played at his best position. No, you're right. He should never be in their starting team and most Man City fans feel that way. Glad you sorted that out bro . I said no such thing. I have reported, accurately, that there are Manchester City fans who do not believe that Kevin should be a part of their first choice XI. I have no idea whether he should, or should not be. I don't watch them much. I can tell you that there seem to be two main criticisms City fans have about KDB. They complain that he gives the ball away too cheaply too often and that he is lazy in his defensive duties. They tend to acknowledge that he plays high risk/high reward passes and accept that the completion rate for such passes will inevitably be lower but they say it's what they see as Kevin's wastefulness with straightforward, possession, passes that lets the team down. You can shoot the messenger again if you like but it won't change the message. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,072 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 On 21/02/2016 at 2:46 PM, Weckerz said: Stop lying to try and make a point please, this drivel couldn't be further from the truth. I wish you had shown more maturity in the way you responded. If you are looking to get a rise out of me you are going to be disappointed. Had you done your homework you would have read the posts I have read, and you would know that my comments are truthful. Those, who like you, have not read them may want to support what you have said but they would then be making the same mistake as you have. Had you raised a query with a sensible amount of politeness I'd have helped you with references but given the approach you have taken you can hardly be surprised that I'm disinclined to dignify your statement with such help. I can tell you that if you actually bother to check you will even find that a great many of the positive posts about KDB acknowledge what city fans see as his flaws and are written in the form of a defence against the criticisms Kevin receives from their fellow City supporters. Criticisms you want readers of this site to believe I just made up. Now, my contention was that as far as I can divine, the opinion that Kevin would not be a part of City's theoretical best line up, is in the majority. There may be room for debate about whether I have gauged that correctly but the opinion exists and to deny it is only evidence that you have not taken the trouble to check. Essien19, The Skipper and stroey 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 23 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: I think you should show some more maturity in the way you interact on the site. If you are looking to get a rise out of me you are going to be disappointed. Had you done your homework you would have read the posts I have read, and you would know that my comments are truthful. Those, who like you, have not read them may want to support what you have said but they would then be making the same mistake as you have. Had you raised a query with a sensible amount of politeness I'd have helped you with references but given the approach you have taken you can hardly be surprised that I'm disinclined to dignify your statement with such help. I can tell that if you actually bother to check you will even find that a great many of the positive posts about KDB acknowledge what city fans see as his flaws and are written in the form of a defence against the criticisms Kevin receives from their fellow City supporters. Criticisms you want readers of this site to believe I just made up. Now, my contention was that as far as I can divine, the opinion that Kevin would not be a part of their theoretical best line up, is in the majority. There may be room for debate about whether I have gauged that correctly but the opinion exists and to deny it is only evidence that you have not taken the trouble to check. Guerss I'll post it here as well: I wouldn't claim you're lying if I hadn't read City fans opinion on KDB, how you would even assume I'd accuse you for no reason is ridiculous. There's literally hundreds of pages on bluemoon alone describing him as the new Colin Bell (the early euphoria of a great new signing I know, nonetheless posts on a City board), how José was absolutely mental letting him leave Chelsea, how effectively sober he is on the pitch, hell, his stats speak for themself. Ofcourse there are negative posts as well, especially after his little blip before his injury, ficke fans are everywhere. You claim the majority think he shouldn't make the team when everyone is fit and understand why José let him go, which is a blatant lie fella I don't wish to discuss this further, he's not a Chelsea player so I don't really care, just had to call out the BS I read. How I interact on the site is my business and I certainly won't change because of some condescending member who thinks he knows everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,072 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, Weckerz said: Guerss I'll post it here as well: I wouldn't claim you're lying if I hadn't read City fans opinion on KDB, how you would even assume I'd accuse you for no reason is ridiculous. There's literally hundreds of pages on bluemoon alone describing him as the new Colin Bell (the early euphoria of a great new signing I know, nonetheless posts on a City board), how José was absolutely mental letting him leave Chelsea, how effectively sober he is on the pitch, hell, his stats speak for themself. Ofcourse there are negative posts as well, especially after his little blip before his injury, ficke fans are everywhere. You claim the majority think he shouldn't make the team when everyone is fit and understand why José let him go, which is a blatant lie fella I don't wish to discuss this further, he's not a Chelsea player so I don't really care, just had to call out the BS I read. How I interact on the site is my business and I certainly won't change because of some condescending member who thinks he knows everything. If you're read bluemoon then you have read the posts to which I refer and you can have the honesty to apologise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Apologise he says, what the fuck for? I just stated there are posts like you described, I never even denied that. Not the majority though; WHICH YOU CLAIMED, hence "lie". edit: can you please not edit your post after I tell you it's my business how I interact on the site? To make it clear you said: "I think you should show some more maturity in the way you interact on the site"; not "I wish you had shown more maturity in the way you responded" Cheers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,072 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 2 hours ago, Weckerz said: Apologise he says, what the fuck for? I just stated there are posts like you described, I never even denied that. Not the majority though; WHICH YOU CLAIMED, hence "lie". edit: can you please not edit your post after I tell you it's my business how I interact on the site? To make it clear you said: "I think you should show some more maturity in the way you interact on the site"; not "I wish you had shown more maturity in the way you responded" Cheers. I did initially write that but realised the original was not well worded and changed it before your reply appeared, i.e. we must have been typing at the same time. You'll acknowledge that we were replying to each other pretty much as live at that point. I'm posting this only to acknowledge that I did indeed reword my comment. There is a difference between 'lie' and error or misjudgement. Since you know Bluemoon and the thread in question you should have no problem finding the run of pages over which these considered, i.e. not initial, honeymoon period, thoughts were being expressed and you'll see that my characterisation was reasonable. Lie remains a word for which you should apologise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.