sleazyB 58 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 It might make sense, but having to watch him play seems very underwhelming. So it's a no thanks from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Why not? The last thing we need is a young striker with Sturridge and Lukaku at the club.Berbatov as a back-up striker for the next two years would be great. By that time, Lukaku would be ready to actually play a part in the first team.Alright going by that logic, then we should sign a 30 something year old midfielder just so he can leave in a couple years and McEachran can have a chance?We won't win things doing that, if Lukaku and Sturridge are good enough then they should be able to challenge whoever we bring in, and that person should definitely not be Man utd's 5th choice striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Alright going by that logic, then we should sign a 30 something year old midfielder just so he can leave in a couple years and McEachran can have a chance?We won't win things doing that, if Lukaku and Sturridge are good enough then they should be able to challenge whoever we bring in, and that person should definitely not be Man utd's 5th choice striker.Berbatov scores goals and that's a good thing from a backup striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Alright going by that logic, then we should sign a 30 something year old midfielder just so he can leave in a couple years and McEachran can have a chance?We won't win things doing that, if Lukaku and Sturridge are good enough then they should be able to challenge whoever we bring in, and that person should definitely not be Man utd's 5th choice striker.So Pirlo is available on a free an your response would be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 So Pirlo is available on a free an your response would be?Pirlo is world class, i don't think any team can turn him down even at his age. But Berbatov is not.Berbatov scores goals and that's a good thing from a backup striker.Yes and that's great, but it's his age that concerns me the most. 31 years old and is probably (or will soon be) on the decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin123 538 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Slow and lazy is not what we need, link up play brilliant in slow build up but im pretty sure we're aiming to hit hard and fastLove berbs as a player but he ain't for us or manU either as if noticed while he was scoring at manU nobody else was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DYC. 7,542 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Alright going by that logic, then we should sign a 30 something year old midfielder just so he can leave in a couple years and McEachran can have a chance?We won't win things doing that, if Lukaku and Sturridge are good enough then they should be able to challenge whoever we bring in, and that person should definitely not be Man utd's 5th choice striker.Two completely unrelated issues. We need a back-up striker as going into the season with just Torres and Sturridge is very risky, arguably too risky.In this case, Berbatov is ideal as he only has a few years left and Lukaku will need at least two years of regular football before he's actually Chelsea material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Two completely unrelated issues. We need a back-up striker as going into the season with just Torres and Sturridge is very risky, arguably too risky.In this case, Berbatov is ideal as he only has a few years left and Lukaku will need at least two years of regular football before he's actually Chelsea material.Question is, do we need a back up striker or do we need someone capable of putting Torres on the bench like Drogba did? someone who can show up in the biggest games, don't think Berbatov is that man.Chicarito is better imo, sure he doesn't do a lot right, but he scores goals when it matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Question is, do we need a back up striker or do we need someone capable of putting Torres on the bench like Drogba did? someone who can show up in the biggest games, don't think Berbatov is that man.Chicarito is better imo, sure he doesn't do a lot right, but he scores goals when it matters.Guy offers nothing, can't hold up play, doesn't link in with midfield and he is a midget. Hell I'd sign Defoe before I signed this guy.Name me someone available at a reasonable price who could play as a back up striker? Tired off the our only choice is a £30-40 million striker threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DYC. 7,542 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Question is, do we need a back up striker or do we need someone capable of putting Torres on the bench like Drogba did? someone who can show up in the biggest games, don't think Berbatov is that man.Chicarito is better imo, sure he doesn't do a lot right, but he scores goals when it matters.That's a different discussion. Torres was told he'd be the number 1 striker this season. Going by that, if we're in the market for a striker, it'll be a back-up striker.If we are looking for someone to really challenge the number 1 striker spot, then Bebrbatov is not the player we should be looking at yeah.Hernandez won't join. And he's useless with the ball anyway, giving you a huge disadvantage against when facing good opposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 our most desperate need is a winger before a striker. but because we need both i'd rather jovetic. he can play both positions just like hulk and alot cheaper with a higher ceiling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 That's different discussion. Torres was told he'd be the number 1 striker this season. Going by that, if we're in the market for a striker, it'll be a back-up striker.exactly which is why i dont believe any of the cavani rumors...but i'd rather a dynamic winger/st. not just an out an out sitting on the bench playing few games here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Guy offers nothing, can't hold up play, doesn't link in with midfield and he is a midget. Hell I'd sign Defoe before I signed this guy.Name me someone available at a reasonable price who could play as a back up striker? Tired off the our only choice is a £30-40 million striker threads.1. I thought the job of a striker was only to score? hardly anyone cares about anything Torres does, except from the fact he can't score, and Chicarito sure can score2. Not many good players will join to play as back-up striker.Edit: If we want a striker to be strictly a back up, then we can get pretty much anyone, from Steven Fletcher to Crouch to Berbatov. Hardly inspiring options if Torres can't play though.That's a different discussion. Torres was told he'd be the number 1 striker this season. Going by that, if we're in the market for a striker, it'll be a back-up striker.If we are looking for someone to really challenge the number 1 striker spot, than Bebrbatov is not the player we should be looking at yeah.Hernandez won't join. And he's useless with the ball anyway, giving you a huge disadvantage against when facing good opposition.Fair enough then, personally i don't really care what Torres said, i want (and hope) Chelsea to get a better striker than him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 1. I thought the job of a striker was only to score? hardly anyone cares about anything Torres does, except from the fact he can't score, and Chicarito sure can score2. Not many good players will join to play as back-up striker.Fair enough then, personally i don't really care what Torres said, i want (and hope) Chelsea to get a better striker than him.I agree which is why someone with a 2:1 strike rate in the PL who can hold up the ball and is available cheap would be a viable option for a season or two as second fiddle to our main striker. Besides I think a striker should offer more than just goals, Drogba was an outlet who could hold up the ball and bring others into the game. Chico doesn't offer that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 I agree which is why someone with a 2:1 strike rate in the PL who can hold up the ball and is available cheap would be a viable option for a season or two as second fiddle to our main striker. Besides I think a striker should offer more than just goals, Drogba was an outlet who could hold up the ball and bring others into the game. Chico doesn't offer that...Everything you said makes sense and would make him a good option, but i just can't see it happening because of his age.Sure you might think his age is an advantage, but what's to say RDM and the board think the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Everything you said makes sense and would make him a good option, but i just can't see it happening because of his age.Sure you might think his age is an advantage, but what's to say RDM and the board think the same?Fair enough can't argue with that... ?Just worried about our back up plan, guess they have something up there sleeve though. Have to wait and see I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 It's pretty clear to me that Sturridge is the back up striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 It's pretty clear to me that Sturridge is the back up striker.I hear ya, but going into the season with only 2 strikers could be risky given the 60+ games we could be play this year. I don't want another £40 million player, but would feel more comfortable with a cheaper alternative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzchap 8,966 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I agree and have said Berba a number of times. He's such an underrated player and is a great link-up player.If Utd would have played him more last season, I believe they could have won the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaRanger 4 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 no. no aand no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts