Frank Lampard

[Jase 43,479]

He's getting back to Jose for what he says about Arsenal. And you have to admit, there is some truth to what he's saying.

Not disputing the point he made. Just that why he likes to talk about other people's business over and over and over again.

[Ainsley Harriott 2,732]

He's getting back to Jose for what he says about Arsenal. And you have to admit, there is some truth to what he's saying.

Of course there's truth to it. If anyone knows anything about their players joining rivals, it's Wenger.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Not disputing the point he made. Just that why he likes to talk about other people's business over and over and over again.

This is one of the very few times he'll get to "get one over on" Chelsea. Let him have it..

[Jase 43,479]

This is one of the very few times he'll get to "get one over on" Chelsea. Let him have it..

It's not only about Chelsea. This is like the 436 734 835th time he has spoken about Man City's business ever since they became a powerhouse.

[Kostas 1,468]

Sup'

I see it's Term against the consensus again, not surprised that things haven't changed. I'm even less surprised by how, among familiar faces, I am again on the same side of the debate.

On topic: I definitely need to give this time to sink in but I can't possibly agree with a "nothing has changed" sentiment.

I'm disgusted and dissapointed. Most of all, as my time-period as a Chelsea fan concides perfectly with Lampard's stay at Chelsea, I am sad.

[iseah100 5,612]

Sup'

I see it's Term against the consensus again, not surprised that things haven't changed. I'm even less surprised by how, among familiar faces, I am again on the same side of the debate.

On topic: I definitely need to give this time to sink in but I can't possibly agree with a "nothing has changed" sentiment.

I'm disgusted and dissapointed. Most of all, as my time-period as a Chelsea fan concides perfectly with Lampard's stay at Chelsea, I am sad.

Does this tarnish Lamps legacy? Is he not a legend? Is he a traitor or Judas?

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

What about a farewell game?

[Steve 10,227]

Is there a record of what mods get up to in the logs?, I'll need to show that to Jim.

Firstly Jim won't care. You were so good for so long, what has made you go back to your old ways?

Back on topic everyone.

[The Chels 2,502]

Firstly Jim won't care. You were so good for so long, what has made you go back to your old ways? Back on topic everyone.

A controversial opinions relapse? Back to rehab!

[Chelsea? 892]

At first i was confused and pretty disappointed but right now i couldn't give a toss, i admit it's going to be weird seeing him in a City shirt but it's only a loan, i doubt he'll play much.

that's what 'betral' makes it worse for me actually. If he simply wanted PL football cool, but he just seems to be doing this for the gell of it

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Double standards on here make me sick sometimes, smh..

[Special Juan 27,429]

See this thread has taken it usual turn. It no sooner settles down and then bang it's back to throwing shit at each other.

If the debate doesn't remain on track and civil it's locked, it's the only way.

[The Rising Sun 710]

Does this tarnish Lamps legacy? Is he not a legend? Is he a traitor or Judas?

Does nothing to his Legacy, just adds a bitter spot in regards to the emotional sentiment and his history with the club.

[The Rising Sun 710]

Firstly Jim won't care. You were so good for so long, what has made you go back to your old ways?

Back on topic everyone.

I hope he does care.

I dont care what Term x had been saying but a moderator editing someones post to "im a cunt" cant be considered to be ok.

[Special Juan 27,429]

I hope he does care.

I dont care what Term x had been saying but a moderator editing someones post to "im a cunt" cant be considered to be ok.

Right, I did ask for people to remain on topic and you pull this back up. Let the person and people concerned deal with it please, and you just concentrate on trying to get this back on topic if you can.

[ParNolio7 285]

Given it a few days to sink in, and I think I'm over it. Frank should do what Frank thinks he should do. It's not as if Mourinho still had plans with him here, so Frank just should try and extend his fantastic career in whichever way he thinks is best. And we should be grateful for the 95% of that career that he's spent at Chelsea. Frank forever!

[The Rising Sun 710]

Right, I did ask for people to remain on topic and you pull this back up. Let the person and people concerned deal with it please, and you just concentrate on trying to get this back on topic if you can.

Sorry for that! Just thought it needed to be said!!

Back on topic!!

Lampard will always be a Chelsea Legend! But why on earth did he go to Man City out of all teams!!

Should have gone back to West Ham, where it all started for him.... that would have at least made sense.

Or controversially gone to QPR with Harry, who kickstarted his career.

I guess no one will know why he did what he has done till his contract expires with the city teams, or till he writes a book.

Either way, i cant say good luck to him at city.

[zolayes 14,489]

I only had problems during the spell under AVB when it was obvious Frank wasn't trying on the pitch.

It seems he was disruptive off the pitch as well .

With regards to this move I will repeat what I said at the start of this thread . He has done NOTHING wrong