Jump to content

Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub


Hamilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, kellzfresh said:

If arsenal will let us

Think Arsenal would seriously consider a 50-60 mil bid. It would allow them to invest in a winger.

Lacazette and his camp know the money at Chelsea is good and will realise the #9 position is up for grabs.

Fellow countrymen in Kante and Giroud at the club to help ease the transition.

I think this is a very plausible transfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DYC. said:

Think Arsenal would seriously consider a 50-60 mil bid. It would allow them to invest in a winger.

Lacazette and his camp know the money at Chelsea is good and will realise the #9 position is up for grabs.

Fellow countrymen in Kante and Giroud at the club to help ease the transition.

I think this is a very plausible transfer.

I will be more than happy with lacazette but signing player from your rival is almost impossible these days unless the player is clearly not happy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, communicate said:

I will be more than happy with lacazette but signing player from your rival is almost impossible these days unless the player is clearly not happy 

Aubameyang is first choice. That’s what makes it possible for me.

His situation is somewhat similar to Welbeck back at Utd and Milner at City. Or more recently, Oxlade leaving Arsenal for Liverpool. All searching for a first XI spot.

If the money is right (transfer + wages), it’s possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DYC. said:

Aubameyang is first choice. That’s what makes it possible for me.

His situation is somewhat similar to Welbeck back at Utd and Milner at City. Or more recently, Oxlade leaving Arsenal for Liverpool. All searching for a first XI spot.

If the money is right (transfer + wages), it’s possible.

Stop dreaming! You think genius board of ours will think of this and try to sign Lacazette? :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our biggest weakness apart from striker situation is nr. 10 position IMO. City struggled when Silva and KDB were injured, not because Gundogan and Bilva are not good midfielders but because they didn't have a creative force in midfield. Liverpool struggled to break down teams that defended deep when they played Wijnaldum-Milner... Look at their scores when Shaqiri starts in nr. 10 position, they are scoring for fun. They both have much better trio upfront but with lack of support they can't produce miracles. The same with us... Kovacic and Kante are probably worldclass midfielders but they can't create. They are b2b midfielders and they need creative player alongside... Barkley used to be this kind of player at Everton but right now he is "too safe" with backwards and sideways passing. Fabregas would be the best choice right now.. Maybe RLC but I am not sure. 

Mason Mount seems like an option for this position or James Maddison from Leicester. Someone with that flair... I would even try Hazard there with Odoi in his natural left wing position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

Mason Mount is nowhere near ready, not only that but he is not as good as people make out.

He is 1000 lightyears away from being ready for our first team. He needs to statt eating 3 large meals a day because he is far too lightweight for mens football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sideshow Luiz said:

With the lack of top available strikers out there, how about any AM players that are goal scorers like Firmino was before he went to Liverpool?

Fekir I guess would be the obvious one of that ilk. 

I think if we had a couple of players supporting the striker with 10-15 goals a season, then the striker probably only needs 15-20 himself.

The problem we have is our strikers don't score and we don't generate nearly enough goals out wide with the exception of Hazard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Superblue_1986 said:

Fekir I guess would be the obvious one of that ilk. 

I think if we had a couple of players supporting the striker with 10-15 goals a season, then the striker probably only needs 15-20 himself.

The problem we have is our strikers don't score and we don't generate nearly enough goals out wide with the exception of Hazard.

We have 0 goals in this team.  RLC in midfield and Pedro provide some, but not enough to compensate.  I was really really hoping that Morata would come good under Sarri.  Every other CF under him has had career years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You