Manuf 1,448 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 1. Scholes is the greatest English midfielder of his generation. 2. Lampard already is England's greatest midfielder goal scorer ever. A record that could possibly be carried on for maybe centuries. BowtiesAreCool 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 lol Scholes????????????????? U are kiddin me right??? That small ginger fella who has been a complement player for Utd his entire life? This has to be joke. The only argument for Scholes is that he has won so many titles with manU but than u could also argue Carrick is the best English midfielder of his generation. Both also have never won an individual award. Maybe that is also an argument for u that a player is good. lol. Scholes might have played for ages but he has been average his entire career. Lamps displaced Scholes in the England team, cos he is better. Lamps has actually LED his team to titles not been an occasional sub. lamps has scored and assisted multiple times the number scholes has. Lamps has won countless individual award including 2nd best player in the world even though he is English, even though an EPL palyer, even though he split votes with Gerrard. I'd even have Gerrard over Scholes anyday and Gerrard is only a poor people's Lamps. LOLZ Scholes. my ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 lol Scholes????????????????? U are kiddin me right??? That small ginger fella who has been a complement player for Utd his entire life? This has to be joke. The only argument for Scholes is that he has won so many titles with manU but than u could also argue Carrick is the best English midfielder of his generation. Both also have never won an individual award. Maybe that is also an argument for u that a player is good. lol. Scholes might have played for ages but he has been average his entire career. That is perhaps the biggest pile of shit I've ever read on the internet. No offence. Mufassir08, Peace., The Skipper and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 That is perhaps the biggest pile of shit I've ever read on the internet. No offence.No problem. I have learned not to give a shit about your opinion, cos all you do is listing some ridiculous theses (often random) theses and renounce giving any arguments for these, usually after quoting other members, even though your post seldom has anything to do with their texts. As a reminder, here is a little sample: "The board's decisions are what is best for the club"(yeah, exactly), "Lampard is not going to change anything when he comes back"(how many goals has he scored since?),"Mata is on course to a 25 goals 30 assists season...."(speaks for itself),"Scholes is better than Lampard"(still funny), unbiased Stating of facts like Scholes never having won an individual award and is small and ginger "is the biggest pile of shit I've ever read on the Internet". You are outdoing yourself again and again, so keep on babbling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 No problem. I have learned not to give a shit about your opinion, cos all you do is listing some ridiculous theses (often random) theses and renounce giving any arguments for these, usually after quoting other members, even though your post seldom has anything to do with their texts. As a reminder, here is a little sample: "The board's decisions are what is best for the club"(yeah, exactly), "Lampard is not going to change anything when he comes back"(how many goals has he scored since?),"Mata is on course to a 25 goals 30 assists season...."(speaks for itself),"Scholes is better than Lampard"(still funny), unbiased Stating of facts like Scholes never having won an individual award and is small and ginger "is the biggest pile of shit I've ever read on the Internet". You are outdoing yourself again and again, so keep on babbling. If you can find a single person on this board who thinks Scholes has been 'average his entire career', I'll leave this site.In fact I'll quit the internet forever because it is THE SINGLE SILLIEST THING I'VE SEEN ON THE INTERNET and I have an email folder full of stupid cat videos thats friends have sent me. OneMoSalah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 lol Scholes????????????????? U are kiddin me right??? That small ginger fella who has been a complement player for Utd his entire life? This has to be joke. The only argument for Scholes is that he has won so many titles with manU but than u could also argue Carrick is the best English midfielder of his generation. Both also have never won an individual award. Maybe that is also an argument for u that a player is good. lol. Scholes might have played for ages but he has been average his entire career. Lamps displaced Scholes in the England team, cos he is better. Lamps has actually LED his team to titles not been an occasional sub. lamps has scored and assisted multiple times the number scholes has. Lamps has won countless individual award including 2nd best player in the world even though he is English, even though an EPL palyer, even though he split votes with Gerrard. I'd even have Gerrard over Scholes anyday and Gerrard is only a poor people's Lamps. LOLZ Scholes. my ass. whoa, Gerrard is a poor man's Lampard? HAHAIt's funny cause Lampard is older than Stevie, yet Stevie made first team before Lampard.... Even when Gerrard got injured for 2002, Lampard did not even get called up for England....Also, I rate both Scholes and Gerrard above Lampard... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 If you can find a single person on this board who thinks Scholes has been 'average his entire career', I'll leave this site.In fact I'll quit the internet forever because it is THE SINGLE SILLIEST THING I'VE SEEN ON THE INTERNET and I have an email folder full of stupid cat videos thats friends have sent me.This forum has too many Chelsea homers..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Scholes over lampard i can definitely understand but no way in fucking hell i will ever have stevie'media darling'gerrard over lampard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo 1,729 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I'm not good at making gifs nor my internet has speed , otherwise i'd had shown you heaps of flicks where he should have done better (:I'm so bored of your trolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santiago. 1,500 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I find it hilarious how he mentions that Scholes has never won any individual awards as if it has any refrence on his blatant tremendous talent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santiago. 1,500 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 whoa, Gerrard is a poor man's Lampard? HAHAIt's funny cause Lampard is older than Stevie, yet Stevie made first team before Lampard.... Even when Gerrard got injured for 2002, Lampard did not even get called up for England....Also, I rate both Scholes and Gerrard above Lampard... Lampard Prime > Gerrard Prime bluesman2610 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Erm, can we just stick to talking all things about Mata here please?There's the English Football Thread elsewhere to talk about who's the best England midfielder in last 10-20 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDY 1,290 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 In terms of ability I think Gerrard is better than Frank, but Lampard has definitely been the more effective player throughout his career, for club and country.Scholes was miles ahead of both, not even up for debate.Edit: Soz, off topic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Erm, can we just stick to talking all things about Mata here please?There's the English Football Thread elsewhere to talk about who's the best England midfielder in last 10-20 years.agreed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 1.Lampard prime > Gerrard prime > Scholes prime In 2005 Lamps and Gerrard both were in there prime. Lamps was 2nd in world player of the year, gerrard 3rd, beaten by a distance. Scholes has never won an individual award of any significance2.Lampard overall > Scholes overall > Gerrard overall (see below)reflected by performances, stats and statistics respectively.https://twitter.com/BigJohnTerry/status/291291194531651584/photo/1They are not quite up to date (from end janaury or so)and only premier league but, updating and including more competitions only influences these stats even more in Lamps's favour, cos Gerrard has only assembled a massive 3 goals since then whilst Scholes has recorded a bombastic 0 goals and 0 assists. Lamps has scored at least 5 goals. If u include all competitions Lamps has 266 goals which is about as much as Scholes and gerrard have combined overall. Also Lamps's 0,3 goals per game ratio beats them both comfortably with 0,2 and 0,23 respectively. Interesting is also that Lamps has more goals in the league alone than either Scholes or Gerrard have overall( which are more matches). Also for England Lamps has a far better scoring record than both. Lamps has outscored Gerrard in 13 of the 17 seasons they have played in parallel, including the including the last 4 running, even though being older, outassisted Gerrard in every season they have played in parallel i have checked so far, outassisted and outscored Paul Scholes in every season since 2004. Scholes's prime 2000-2005 is not even close to Lamps's 2005-2010 in terms of goals and assists and most importantly titles. Yes titles. When Scholes had the biggest imapct on his team during his career before becoming a bench player in these years he won 2 leagues, 1 fa cup, Lamps won 3 leagues, 4 fa cups and 2 league cups when he had the biggest impact on the team. Now i have dug really deep to find some individual awards. He has been "player of the decade 1992-2001 Hutcho 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 This forum has too many Chelsea homers.....then fuck off and watch the yankees ,,,glory hunters supreme,,,Most of our USA posters are good ,,,you should copy them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 1.Lampard prime > Gerrard prime > Scholes prime In 2005 Lamps and Gerrard both were in there prime. Lamps was 2nd in world player of the year, gerrard 3rd, beaten by a distance. Scholes has never won an individual award of any significance2.Lampard overall > Scholes overall > Gerrard overall (see below)reflected by performances, stats and statistics respectively.https://twitter.com/BigJohnTerry/status/291291194531651584/photo/1They are not quite up to date (from end janaury or so)and only premier league but, updating and including more competitions only influences these stats even more in Lamps's favour, cos Gerrard has only assembled a massive 3 goals since then whilst Scholes has recorded a bombastic 0 goals and 0 assists. Lamps has scored at least 5 goals. If u include all competitions Lamps has 266 goals which is about as much as Scholes and gerrard have combined overall. Also Lamps's 0,3 goals per game ratio beats them both comfortably with 0,2 and 0,23 respectively. Interesting is also that Lamps has more goals in the league alone than either Scholes or Gerrard have overall( which are more matches). Also for England Lamps has a far better scoring record than both. Lamps has outscored Gerrard in 13 of the 17 seasons they have played in parallel, including the including the last 4 running, even though being older, outassisted Gerrard in every season they have played in parallel i have checked so far, outassisted and outscored Paul Scholes in every season since 2004. Scholes's prime 2000-2005 is not even close to Lamps's 2005-2010 in terms of goals and assists and most importantly titles. Yes titles. When Scholes had the biggest imapct on his team during his career before becoming a bench player in these years he won 2 leagues, 1 fa cup, Lamps won 3 leagues, 4 fa cups and 2 league cups when he had the biggest impact on the team. Now i have dug really deep to find some individual awards. He has been "player of the decade 1992-2001Agree with everything except, your decade. You mean 2002-2012. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 *ahem* The English Football Thread... Stingray 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 1.Lampard prime > Gerrard prime > Scholes prime In 2005 Lamps and Gerrard both were in there prime. Lamps was 2nd in world player of the year, gerrard 3rd, beaten by a distance. Scholes has never won an individual award of any significance2.Lampard overall > Scholes overall > Gerrard overall (see below)reflected by performances, stats and statistics respectively.https://twitter.com/BigJohnTerry/status/291291194531651584/photo/1They are not quite up to date (from end janaury or so)and only premier league but, updating and including more competitions only influences these stats even more in Lamps's favour, cos Gerrard has only assembled a massive 3 goals since then whilst Scholes has recorded a bombastic 0 goals and 0 assists. Lamps has scored at least 5 goals. If u include all competitions Lamps has 266 goals which is about as much as Scholes and gerrard have combined overall. Also Lamps's 0,3 goals per game ratio beats them both comfortably with 0,2 and 0,23 respectively. Interesting is also that Lamps has more goals in the league alone than either Scholes or Gerrard have overall( which are more matches). Also for England Lamps has a far better scoring record than both. Lamps has outscored Gerrard in 13 of the 17 seasons they have played in parallel, including the including the last 4 running, even though being older, outassisted Gerrard in every season they have played in parallel i have checked so far, outassisted and outscored Paul Scholes in every season since 2004. Scholes's prime 2000-2005 is not even close to Lamps's 2005-2010 in terms of goals and assists and most importantly titles. Yes titles. When Scholes had the biggest imapct on his team during his career before becoming a bench player in these years he won 2 leagues, 1 fa cup, Lamps won 3 leagues, 4 fa cups and 2 league cups when he had the biggest impact on the team. Now i have dug really deep to find some individual awards. He has been "player of the decade 1992-2001Found anyone who agrees with your statement that Scholes was 'average his entire career'? :lol2:Xavi and Guardiola both called him the greatest midfielder of his generation. Do you know who they are? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Has Mata left??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.