Thibaut Courtois

[CHOULO19 24,332]

In my opinion, the issue should be balanced delicately between Cech who is currently better and Courtoise who could be the future solution, meaning: between our short -term gain and long-term gain. I would loan out Thibaut for another season, preferably to a PL club, then at the end of next season consider selling Petr if Courtoise keeps on developing like he currently is.

Like Alex said above, it would be a sad day in Chelsea's history when we see Petr Cech leave, but all good things must come to an end..

[The only place to be 11,313]

In my opinion, the issue should be balanced delicately between Cech who is currently better and Courtoise who could be the future solution, meaning: between our short -term gain and long-term gain. I would loan out Thibaut for another season, preferably to a PL club, then at the end of next season consider selling Petr if Courtoise keeps on developing like he currently is.

Like Alex said above, it would be a sad day in Chelsea's history when we see Petr Cech leave, but all good things must come to an end..

Which PL club?

Sorry Thibaut, but you know you were looking forward to playing in the Champions League next season, something you played a massive part in earning for your teammates of two years, well we'd prefer if you didn't play in that.

Martin Jol is expecting you at Craven Cottage in 20 minutes. Love You.

Just to remind everyone, we're 19 points behind a team with a young goalkeeper who wasn't as good as Courtois was at Atletico and who's last-minute save forced a replay on East fucking Monday. His save percentage (which is a ridiculous measure for a gk) is only 3% less than Cech's too.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Which PL club?

Sorry Thibaut, but you know you were looking forward to playing in the Champions League next season, something you played a massive part in earning for your teammates of two years, well we'd prefer if you didn't play in that.

Martin Jol is expecting you at Craven Cottage in 20 minutes. Love You.

Just to remind everyone, we're 19 points behind a team with a young goalkeeper who wasn't as good as Courtois was at Atletico and who's last-minute save forced a replay on East fucking Monday. His save percentage (which is a ridiculous measure for a gk) is only 3% less than Cech's too.

Yes, he'll probably want to stay at Athletico, but if he accepts, I think a PL loan would be much more beneficial for his career.

Just because utd don't currently have a world class keeper, we should give up one of three the best keepers currently in the world? Cech could still be the difference between winning a cup or not, between first place and second. I don't think we should give that up so lightly.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Yes, he'll probably want to stay at Athletico, but if he accepts, I think a PL loan would be much more beneficial for his career.

Which club? I landed on Fulham because Schwarzer might be on his way out despite him being pretty solid this year. I'm not sure where there might be a spot.

Just because utd don't currently have a world class keeper, we should give up one of three the best keepers currently in the world? Cech could still be the difference between winning a cup or not, between first place and second. I don't think we should give that up so lightly.

I'm not saying we should give him up lightly - he would still command a fee in the transfer market. Statistically he's missing more games season on season (for the last couple of years) and that could become a worrying trend if it continues.

He's probably got another season in him but I think Courtois will probably stay at Atletico next year.

[Bacika 188]

Is in Spain any rule that say one player can't be loaned to the same team three years in row???

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Which club? I landed on Fulham because Schwarzer might be on his way out despite him being pretty solid this year. I'm not sure where there might be a spot.

Any PL club where we can guarantee he'll start. Fullham is probably the most likely. I'd just like to see him at a club where he'd be tested more and thus develop faster.

I'm not saying we should give him up lightly - he would still command a fee in the transfer market. Statistically he's missing more games season on season (for the last couple of years) and that could become a worrying trend if it continues. He's probably got another season in him but I think Courtois will probably stay at Atletico next year.

Yeah I agree the best time to sell Cech would probably be at the end of next season.

[GodZola 630]

I think sentiment is clouding a lot of people's judgement. Me most definitely included.

Agreed and have said as much, least you are honest.

I would say that Courtois isn't as good as Cech right now

Cech who is currently better and Courtois

Cigarette paper between the 2 - we are in a fantastic position despite the difference in opinions. Cech is not at the level he used to be but still quality, Courtois has 10 years at the top at the very least, we need to secure his services for that time.

[GodZola 630]

Just to remind everyone, we're 19 points behind a team

Not everyone, i strongly referenced this point yesterday - 2 keepers of real quality will ease the gap but just the start of what the club need to sustain a title challenge.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Uh? Wow. Did defo NOT see this comment coming from you Alex :-)

Cech is my favourite player, everyone knows; so I am always going to be very defensive of him. But that doesn't mean I am being ignorant of Courtois' potential. I just want what is best for this club. Right now, it is Cech between the sticks. But the season after next, it is most definitely necessary for Courtois to replace him.

Petr Cech vs Courtois

• Both goalkeepers very good shot-stoppers. (Cech 1-1 Courtois).
• Cech probably the better dealing with crosses (Courtois has a tendency to try and punch rather than try and catch; should be the opposite way for my money). (Cech 2-1 Courtois).
• Courtois quicker at distribution which would improve our counter-attacking policy; Cech prefers to take his time and prefers long clearances upfield - 90% of the time just returns the ball to the opponent. (Cech 2-2 Courtois).
• Cech has the massive advantage of experience. Firstly, he has a reputation. You see PETR CECH on the team-sheet and it instils confidence in the team; conversely, if you see TURNBULL, opponents will target him as a weakness. Courtois will come here needing to forge a reputation as a great goalkeeper. Secondly, experience is key when it comes to anticipation and positioning, which are a goalkeeper's two most-important assets. Young goalkeepers are sometimes overly-brave to the point where they are kamikaze; Cech has the level of restraint to know when to come out on goal (as seen from his absolutely incredible shots-to-saves ratio when one-on-one, which was the highest out of any of the Premier League goalkeepers last season). Cech 3-2 Courtois.
• In terms of longevity, Courtois wins on two counts. Firstly, he is young. Secondly, Cech will not play until he is 40, like some people think. He will be lucky to see to 35. He has a chronic elbow injury (due to repetitive strain; only giving up the game will allow it to heal), has a history of problems with his left calf, and of course there is the psychological aspect of his skull injury. A second lofty blow to the head could end his career. Courtois, on the other hand, is younger and physically the more impressive. From what I've seen, he is just as strong as Cech, although I don't think he's quite learnt to use his build to dominate his area (like when going for crosses, he prefers to scoop the ball rather than catch it at mid-day, as Cech does). Cech 3-3 Courtois.

From this crude little experiment, I give the impression there is very little to choose between the two, which is correct. Cech is the better keeper at present, by my making, but for the good of the club, it is necessary for Courtois to join either this summer, or the next. We can hope for four more seasons from Cech, whereas we can get 10 from Thibaut. Furthermore, if Cech was to leave, you could reasonably get £10 million for him and the wage bill would be massively slashed. In the long-term, as much as it may be upsetting, Cech will have to leave.

[Thomas Williams 166]

Although cech may be better, is it worth risking Courtois over another season of Cech? Even if the odds of losing Courtois are relatively small, I feel it's a big risk when Cech is only marginally if not debatably better at the moment.

[Rekin 835]

Which PL club?

Sorry Thibaut, but you know you were looking forward to playing in the Champions League next season, something you played a massive part in earning for your teammates of two years, well we'd prefer if you didn't play in that.

Martin Jol is expecting you at Craven Cottage in 20 minutes. Love You.

Just to remind everyone, we're 19 points behind a team with a young goalkeeper who wasn't as good as Courtois was at Atletico and who's last-minute save forced a replay on East fucking Monday. His save percentage (which is a ridiculous measure for a gk) is only 3% less than Cech's too.

So what though?

Yes, he is a great goalkeeper who deserves to play in CL, but that goes for a lot of players. He was bought by Chelsea and it is expected that he does what they ask of him while he is under contract.

He strikes me as a guy who is down to earth and smart enough to realize that he isn't being punished by being asked to be in goal for a midtable club in England, but in order to prepare him for being nr1 at Chelsea.

He is very young and very talented for his age, so it should be quite obvious that he has a lot of years of CL ahead of him. If he can't take missing out on it for just one year then perhaps he doesnt have the mental strength expected on this level to begin with.

De Gea is a great goalkeeper, but he would have benefitted from being on loan at another club in PL first. Utd lost the title that season with the smallest possible margin, it is very possible that it would have gone differently if De Gea would have been more used to the league.

Keep in mind that Utd had two disadventages compared to us, first of all they needed a new keeper right away due to VDS retiring, and second De Gea was too big of a name to go on loan. Chelsea have Cech and Courtois was quite a low key signing, so there is quite a large difference there.

[Peace. 4,352]

Sending him on loan in a Premier League club would be baffling, if I were to be honest.

Atletico is a club that finished in the league 5th, last year, and is currently 3rd. Last year they won the Europa League, and this year the European Supercup ; while they have reached, this year, the final of the Copa del Rey. And they are set to play in the Champions League, next year. They ain't no major club in Europe ; they are a competitive club, though. I don't see how a mid-table team from the Premier League would be more relevant than a loan to Atletico. If he were to be loaned in England, only an upper-table side would make sens — but are we to strengthen a potential rival ?

A down-step... That's how I would picture this move if it were to occur. Being in a competitive side which will be able to be in CL is more valuable, for him (in order to gain experience and improve his game), than being in a team which floats between the 15th and 6th position in the league. More challenge - more expectations - more pressure.

And regarding the point be to place only the raised, that's kinda true. He is one of the reasons why Atletico is set to play in the Champions League, next year. He deserves to pursue this experience. It's not as if sending him to the Fulhams of this world would be a promotion. And it's not about him being unable to take missing out the CL, as you @Rekin implied. That's more like a reward. He's done very good over the past two years — it would only be rewarding his good work. Moreover, letting him stay at Atletico might instil confidence toward us in him, he would see that the club pays attention to him.

And I don't see any reason for which he shall be loaned to an English team before being considered as ready to be the first GK for Chelsea, really. If the were fundamental differences between the two leagues, regarding the way of goalkeeping... But at they end of the day, the ball is round in both places.

[Weckerz 3,781]

Sending him on loan in a Premier League club would be baffling, if I were to be honest.

Atletico is a club that finished in the league 5th, last year, and is currently 3rd. Last year they won the Europa League, and this year the European Supercup ; while they have reached, this year, the final of the Copa del Rey. And they are set to play in the Champions League, next year. They ain't no major club in Europe ; they are a competitive club, though. I don't see how a mid-table team from the Premier League would be more relevant than a loan to Atletico. If he were to be loaned in England, only an upper-table side would make sens — but are we to strengthen a potential rival ?

A down-step... That's how I would picture this move if it were to occur. Being in a competitive side which will be able to be in CL is more valuable, for him (in order to gain experience and improve his game), than being in a team which floats between the 15th and 6th position in the league. More challenge - more expectations - more pressure.

And regarding the point be to place only the raised, that's kinda true. He is one of the reasons why Atletico is set to play in the Champions League, next year. He deserves to pursue this experience. It's not as if sending him to the Fulhams of this world would be a promotion. And it's not about him being unable to take missing out the CL, as you @Rekin implied. That's more like a reward. He's done very good over the past two years — it would only be rewarding his good work. Moreover, letting him stay at Atletico might instil confidence toward us in him, he would see that the club pays attention to him.

And I don't see any reason for which he shall be loaned to an English team before being considered as ready to be the first GK for Chelsea, really. If the were fundamental differences between the two leagues, regarding the way of goalkeeping... But at they end of the day, the ball is round in both places.

Couldn't agree more.

[LukakutoStamford 779]

^{The key point is that Courtois was better than De Gea in La Liga. He's better than him now. The other point to notice is that Courtois is also loading up on international caps whith Belgium whereas De Gea wasn't showcasing with Spain. It's not like there was no one else for Belgium either. Mignolet has been excellent for Sunderland this year in spite of their poor record.}

^{I think Courtois is a generational talent and as I mentioned previously he's already well past where other legendary Belgian goalkeepers (Pfaff, Preud'Homme) were at age 20.}

[Rekin 835]

Sending him on loan in a Premier League club would be baffling, if I were to be honest.

Atletico is a club that finished in the league 5th, last year, and is currently 3rd. Last year they won the Europa League, and this year the European Supercup ; while they have reached, this year, the final of the Copa del Rey. And they are set to play in the Champions League, next year. They ain't no major club in Europe ; they are a competitive club, though. I don't see how a mid-table team from the Premier League would be more relevant than a loan to Atletico. If he were to be loaned in England, only an upper-table side would make sens — but are we to strengthen a potential rival ?

A down-step... That's how I would picture this move if it were to occur. Being in a competitive side which will be able to be in CL is more valuable, for him (in order to gain experience and improve his game), than being in a team which floats between the 15th and 6th position in the league. More challenge - more expectations - more pressure.

And regarding the point be to place only the raised, that's kinda true. He is one of the reasons why Atletico is set to play in the Champions League, next year. He deserves to pursue this experience. It's not as if sending him to the Fulhams of this world would be a promotion. And it's not about him being unable to take missing out the CL, as you @Rekin implied. That's more like a reward. He's done very good over the past two years — it would only be rewarding his good work. Moreover, letting him stay at Atletico might instil confidence toward us in him, he would see that the club pays attention to him.

And I don't see any reason for which he shall be loaned to an English team before being considered as ready to be the first GK for Chelsea, really. If the were fundamental differences between the two leagues, regarding the way of goalkeeping... But at they end of the day, the ball is round in both places.

Yes, CL would be a great experience for him, I could not agree more. If he was to be loaned out for two more seasons, then I would absolutely agree that he should stay in Atletico for another year.

We do not know if that is the case though, if he is being prepared for being first choice in the 2014-15 season then he needs to be prepared for what is coming. Did you see De Gea's first season? He is an excellent goalkeeper but he was struggling during that time, Utd's defense saved him on a number of occasions.

Regarding the last point you are making, there is a large difference between being a goalkeeper in the two places, De Gea said so himself after arriving.

I am not saying that Courtois should be sent to Reading, but a loan to a club such as Everton, WBA or similar would certainly prepare him for the league.

Did he not say himself in a recent interview that he is expecting that development? Surely he and the people at Chelsea would know what steps to take better than anyone else?