Fulham Broadway

I'll give him dogs abuse from the east stand anyway

JT Saying its his duty to face claims of racial abuse n shit..... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15719318.stm

Apparently shes busy with her new boy friend....

Yes milan remember your name from well back

Well done. Laylabelle needs a nomination next time. A long term regular that slips under the radar.....

Nah she, like a few of us was on the original TC forum @ 2005-6

Mmm. Not sure about that Shonx. Considered a racist term in the UK

Well done K. Coventrys finest.

It was heartening to realise the amount of Chelsea fans that still go to England games judging by the amount of booooage he got when he came on.....

We keep hearing how football is a business, so yes I think most owners would sponsor their grannies if it meant more revenue. Wouldnt be surprised if theie were more sponsors on the kits soon, like F1.

I was just thinking if AVB had moaned like that , the press would have been all over it like dose of syphillis. But with King Kenny none of them have piped up

Now that would be funny. Talking of which I notice King Kenny is having a right old moan about the league cup fixture, threatening to play an 'experimental' team. He might like to have said that before they sold out their allocation.

Thats the point. Once they go down the 'thats what was implied route' then you can get nicked or banned for anything. Thought police. Doubtless he'll get booed at Wembley....

Ashley certainly knows how to wind up the barcodes. The fans will still call it St james Park and just hate Ashley even more

bad boy/Ultra blue for October

Absolutely. In my opinion the club have severely misjudged the situation. Ok so they identify the fans chanting at Genk -what exactly do they have to answer to ? Its more damage to club/fan relations. Wolves will be my last game for a while. To be honest I'm getting well fucked off with the Roman, yes men PR machine. Are they getting twitchy about Abramovichs court case ? If found guilty could he be deemed not fit and proper to run a football club ?

More likely his Mr 10% agent. No way anyone with that gormless an expression could negotiate a slow bend, let alone a contract

Exactly -theres worse sung by the opposition about Ashley Cole most games. The club will be on very dodgy legal ground if they try and ban fans who sung 'You know what you are' at the CL game

This is ridiculous , and I'd like to see them enforce it http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10268~2511126,00.html Completely driven by the media, a witch hunt. ''Anton You Know What You Are'' - could mean........ youre a transvestite, you smoke joints and chill out with your bro, you're a wanker...etc .......Wheres the racism -the club doesnt have a leg to stand on imo

If you have an ounce of decency http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/14605

Thing is Kakuta is playing like a pair of pants and cant get in Boltons first team

This crops up all the time and fans would generally welcome it. It works well in Germany and you can get a beer as well stood up. Cant see it happening any time soon though -but it's like all these things it needs popular pressure -ie the fans of the Premier League clubs need to unite and lobby Parliament, because at the moment its enshrined in legislation.

Gourlay mentioned all this after the NO vote. Its almost like a spite thimg because they didnt get their way, but hey ho. The Samsung Stamford Bridge or something probably. Also the 'Ron Gourlay Stand' would be good

Too late Steve, unless I get a divorce

My 'agenda' is the best for the club, as opposed to an agenda as an apologist for Buck and Gourlays PR . No apologies for posting this from CFC Net CFCnet has received a startling tip off from a merchant banker (purporting to be from a top City institution) regarding the CPO stadium land grab by Chelsea FC. The anonymous tip off, received on our iPhone but from an untraceable number, is made all the more convincing because we asked said banker to prove his credentials. He replied by describing the interior elevator to the fifth floor, the one that houses Roman, Tenenbaum etc (the real power clique behind Buck and Gourlay). The banker described how the elevator goes between Floor One & Four in normal fashion (correct) but to access Floor Five one has to insert a special plastic card (correct). He also described the Russian Special Forces goon (bulging left armpit) at the entrance to the fifth floor posing as security (also correct). Clearly, whoever this chap is, he’s been to the inner sanctum of Chelsea FC. The banker went on to reveal that the recent stadium land grab by Chelsea FC (snap EGM/£269,000 in dodgy share purchases leading up to the vote/carefully plotted PR campaign) had nothing whatsoever to do with a move to a new stadium. This is what the banker had to say, “The stadium move might or might not happen but it is not the real reason Chelsea tried to railroad CPO shareholders into handing over their shares.” He continued, “rather it’s because Chelsea intend to follow Man Utd’s lead and list on one of the Asian Stock Exchanges, either Hong Kong or Singapore.” When asked why this would involve CPO, the banker stated, “The Club intend to float 49% of the Club – to raise upwards of £500 million – but to do that it must offer investors more than a few players, a training ground and a balance sheet nursing red ink.” The banker then added, “any flotation must be backed by real assets and that means the 12-odd acres of Chelsea real estate. The pitch, because it is owned by CPO, represents a considerable barrier that must be removed – it’s essentially a ransom strip.” The banker then went on, “the Club’s line that they can’t negotiate with brownfield site owners because of CPO is laughable. The moment anyone in the City of London sees Roman Abramovich the doors are flung wide open. To suggest otherwise is a poorly disguised lie.” CFCnet then asked about the stadium move to which we received the following answer, “I’m not involved in that, I was only involved in the preliminary stages of organising a flotation and my role has been passed on to more senior bankers”. The banker then added, “it would be easy for the Club to say where it was moving the stadium to. The reason it isn’t prepared to do so is probably because they don’t have anywhere earmarked yet they still need to float the Club. That’s why they can’t tell the truth.” CFCnet doesn’t feel competent enough in investment banking matters to comment on the accuracy (or not) of the above tip off. All we can vouch for is that whoever this person is, he has been to visit the inner coterie of Chelsea FC board members (the organ grinder behind Bruce Buck and Ron Gourlay). It also answers at a swipe why the Club can’t tell CPO shareholders where they want to move to. In all probability they don’t have anywhere in mind. Indeed, this week’s announcement by Hammersmith & Fulham Council (“The Council now proposes to examine whether there are planning options to expand Stamford Bridge to accommodate a larger capacity”) also gives lie to the fact that all Stamford Bridge options have been exhausted and that the Council is itself a ‘barrier’. What we at CFCnet know is (a) the Club are lying ( there is a deeper agenda at work. What agenda this is we don’t know but the above conversation has certainly made us stop and think, especially as our fan base in Asia is second only to Man Utd.