Biased Refereeing and then Biased Commentary. Commentator :"Luiz went down too easily I think" (Replay shows Giggs tugging shirt) Commentator: "There is a tug of the shirt. But that's not a freekick"
BEST FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE - Jaimin BEST GENERAL KNOWLEDGE - Choulo BEST NEWCOMER (must have joined after May 2012) - Mufassir BEST ARTICLE WRITER - Choulo BEST GRAPHICS DESIGNER - Amels BEST STAFF MEMBER - FulhamBroadway FUNNIEST FORUMER - Stingray MOST-LIKED FORUMER - Ankit WISEST FORUMER - Peace MOST CONTROVERSIAL - TX has mellowed. Sloth BIGGEST CONTRIBUTOR - Jay BRITISH MEMBER OF THE YEAR - Ryan Davidson INTERNATIONAL MEMBER OF THE YEAR - Rmpr
Bayern is an ideal example. Ribery and Muller are much better at tracking back than Hazard and Oscar. But yes, that is the model Chelsea should be going for. Relentless in attack but also regaining defensive shape quickly. Also, look at the Bayern midfield - Kroos/Schweinsteiger/Martinez are hard-workers unlike Modric. With the current midfielders we have, we do need protection in the pivot imo.
I love the idea of a pace-demon. It works in the league, especially vs big teams who push up to control the game. Midfielders can slip in through balls - similar to how Walcott usually scores
. His tackling is poor. No strength to speak of. His defensive game is limited to basic closing down. With Mata basically playing as a forward, the pivot needs to be more defensive. I agree with the later half of your point. Playmaking-wise he's a good player. He offers dribbling from deep as well but he wouldn't be my first choice
I get the point but Chelsea are defensively reliant on the pivot and Modric has little or nothing appreciable on his defensive game. The problem is Mata in all this and it's ironic that he's our best player. Mata at CAM does almost no tracking back and so, the midfield pivot has extra defensive duties.