Fernando

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/liga-karanka-ponders-joining-mourinho-chelsea-092432047.html;_ylt=ArNBq8t.ljkGED_oE_3zFDoxg4t4;_ylu=X3oDMTRxM2JnZXBsBG1pdANUb3AgU3RvcmllcyBNaXhlZCBMaXN0IEZvb3RiYWxsIFNGBHBrZwM0YmNlYmM2Ni1kMDBiLTMzNWEtYWFmMy1iNjIxMWVjYThmMDYEcG9zAzYEc2VjA01lZGlhQkxpc3RNaXhlZExQQ0FUZW1wBHZlcgM1N2Y1MmEyMi1jOWQ4LTExZTItYWU1NC03YWE2MWIzODljNGM-;_ylg=X3oDMTI4azZvNG1uBGludGwDZ2IEbGFuZwNlbi1nYgRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANmb290YmFsbARwdANzZWN0aW9ucwR0ZXN0A2NvbnRyb2xfdGFncw--;_ylv=3

Even Lampard now at his age is still at beast and will have him on my team above any other player....well besides Mata. But today, KDB over Lampard? No way Jose! Let him stay on loan till Lampard is ready to leave.

Better then Lampard? Lampard who is probably now the best player ever in the history of this club? Damn, he is either that good or the over hype is going overboard. Like when people did the same thing with Kakuta......

Reading that comment he made, it might be possible he will leave to Barcelona.

Better then Oscar? Let's not get ahead of our self here.

Who has bite us in the ass? Sturridge? Borini? Stoch? Rajkovic? Hardly top talents that you think they have the potential to be like Hazard, Mata or Lampard. Sturridge was good, but it was mainly the fault of the club trying to bring the best out of Torres, which was a fail event. Other then that, I don't think there has been a player we let go that turned out to be world class. If you have one, please let me know so I can rationalize with you about this.

So then he leaves. Dortmund is not a team that can challenge for years to come, because Bayern will keep buying their talents. I believe the boy is smart, and would rather come back to Chelsea. Like I said, unless it's Bayern Munich, there is no other team in that league that should worry Chelsea.

Who the fucks cares about messages. We are Chelsea. Unless it's Bayern Munich calling for him, there is no other team in the Bundesliga we should be scared of losing him to. He knows he is young, and if he wants a future at Chelsea he will need to wait....like a certain Mr. Ryan Bertrand.

Yes you have a point, but the fact of the matter is that the place where KDB would play at Chelsea we already have better players. For his young age, it's better to be on one more year in loan for him to get the best out of it. If by then he can't be in our team because the players we have are much better he will be sold. While Schurrle place at where he would play with us is different. Simple as that. KDB has done good in Bundesliga, but I think one more year on loan will not be the end of the world.

Torres for Cavani? Sounds too good to be true. But here hoping for the best. :blue scalf:

After buying KDB, Courtois, Mata, Lukaku, Oscar, Hazard and much more they are now clueless?

Looks like a total annihilation from Germany towards my country!

Can't compare Arsenal to City. Arsenal never really spend after Roman came. If they had spend, something else would have been the outcome. City already have a good squad, and will continue to spend. Not to mention that their new board members have already impose requirements. For City to win 5 tittles in the next 5 season. Does Arsenal do that? No! So it's a misguided comparison.

The "Mourinho effect" will be shit if we have people like Torres and Mikel in our team!

So if we sell him, then we will make double just in one season. Not bad. KDB might be good, but Mourinho coming back he will decide if to keep him. I'm sure he is aware if the club will sell him or not. If he really wants him he will keep him. Otherwise he will take the money and will use it to get someone he wants.

How much did Chelsea payed for him?

Some interesting friendlies today. My country plays against Germany. Hopefully we put up a good game. :blue scalf:

Anybody who says we will smash city next season is plain delusional. We can't even beat them this season for crying out loud! And the Arsenal's comparison are not realistic, because city spend on players. So they will be our main rivals for many seasons. Thus it will be very competitive games. Would add united but with Ferguson gone we have no idea how it will fare with Moyes.

Colombia have a great team to make it out of first round. Brazil is the one that might disappoint greatly.

Damn that's sexy! And when this team can provide CL football, Monaco will be the ideal place to go. I will say more then PSG and City.

So how much money is Atletico getting? They now should have enough money to buy back torres.

Ok then, in that you have a point. Money, composition of the team....meaning how good the squad is and chance of winning something important. Which in today's world is the CL. "The holy Grail" But when you tell me that a player want's to join because of the shirt and their boyhood club dream......then it's Bullshit! Cause if Chelsea did not payed the big bucks, we would not have gotten the likes of Hazard, Torres, Oscar and such.

Why do you continue talking about the league???? Didn't I said that shit don't matter as long as you got a good team to compete in the CL! But yes you are right CL football isn't a giving, and that's a big gamble. But so it was for City when their owners came. A shit team, with no hope of CL. But money ruled above everything, and now they have a great team. Which leads me back to the starting point. Today's sport is all about the money. That is the norm that rule this game.

But Premier League ain't as great as it was all about before. It's about the CL and you got that right. Choosing another team that does not play CL does seems kinda weird. However, there is that big however. It will make even less sense if that club had no chance of making the CL anytime soon. But if Monaco keep spending that kinda amount of money they should be in the CL very soon, and they will have a great team. Moutinho, James Rodriguez and Falcao is already a big step up then before.

When you can't argue no more, you result to changing the topic. Brilliant! And I will say that's about the majority of here as to following Chelsea when Roman came. But let me just add one thing. Chelsea before Roman was a good club, like if you where to compare it to a team today it will be Tottenham. Some good players, play attractive football, but not a name brand where you will attract top players. Where players would die to play here. Money came and change everything... It literally change everything! Not to mention that Chelsea was about to go into administration. Roman started the wealthy owners trend, and now we are getting more and more clubs follow that. So who are we to talk down another club for doing the same thing, when we started this?