Jump to content

KonohasOrangeFlash

Member
  • Posts

    5,734
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7
  • Country

    Australia

Everything posted by KonohasOrangeFlash

  1. You're old enough to remember Australia whooping England time after time, after time after time....Enjoy it for now, it won't last long, Old timer.
  2. Like who? P.S: It's pretty hypocritical to comment on my ego when your a self-arrogant/smug prick.
  3. Be careful what you wish for. I will absolutely rip into the people who are on the list and go to town on them.
  4. I think I'll create a list of Sturridge Haters/Doubters and if he comes good I'll name and shame. I might do it with Maicon as well.
  5. Yes, he would play in the double pivot role. Is it possible? Yes but highly unlikely.
  6. Don't see it happening. For our current situation I'd prefer Maicon. No thank you, Azpilicueta.
  7. Oh shut up. I'm tired of you saying you dont wan't him.
  8. The point is he can play striker. He would be 3rd choice not 1st.
  9. He's as good as ours now. Can't wait to see him in a Chelsea shirt. He'll be great for us.
  10. Yes! C'mon Aussies! The Hussey brothers have been tremendous servants for Australian Cricket
  11. As has been said so many times before, If we sign Hulk he can play CF. So that's 3 CF's right there. No need to buy an out and out Striker. Also, Sturridge is unproven as a striker? That is truly rich as he has played CF his entire life...It's also obvious he has Talent. We shouldn't give up on him just yet.
  12. Sturridge hasn't left. So getting 2 CF's makes no sense. For some odd reason you also don't want a RB...
  13. You're not answering my original question. I said why 2 CF's? We have Torres and Sturridge. You want us to have 4 strikers fighting for one spot?
  14. So, you can't answer me? Well, I'm right then. Everything you've ever done is pointless
  15. Why do we need 2 CF's?.....Also we won't get nor do we need to get all 4.
  16. Oh, OK so if someone has an opinion that Messi is rubbish, his opinion is not wrong?
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...