Well it's not like he called for a press conference to say this. He was probably asked by the reporter if he is going to leave or stay and he gave the obvious diplomatic answer of saying that he has a 4-year contract here but in football you never know what could happen.
Good signing for Spurs but I can't imagine he would have been anything more than a squad player here. We already have Ramires who for me is much better.
I just love how on twitter you can write some complete bullshit and then put (Telegraph) or (SSN) at the end and it becomes reliable. How about an actual link to The Telegraph actually saying this?!
I fully realize that, but I was just trying to debate with you why you think those two have a better chance than Holland. I think when you look at player quality alone, especially in attack, you have to put Holland ahead of them, for me at least.
Alright. One more thing you might not have noticed mate, in some of the subsections of the "Archives", the page is a little messed up: http://www.talkchelsea.net/_/transfers/ http://www.talkchelsea.net/_/opposition-views/
I do not think either is going to win it, but if I had to chose who has a better chance at doing so, I'd say Holland without hesitation simply because the quality of players they have is better.
In terms of quality of the players, Netherlands is one of the best NTs. If they can find the right system, they can beat anyone. You seriously think that England have a better chance at winning the WC than Holland?
What a match that was, completely worth staying up till 4:00 am. Brasil played with so much heart. Spain never got into the match and Luiz saved their only chance to get into it. Cassillas was rubbish, should have saved all three goals. Del Bosque is an idiot. Neymar was good but MOTM has to be either Cesar or Luiz.