Sheva.

He'd have put Zouma in defense and our prolific RB beside DD. I don't need to defend Mourinho but pumping the ball long to Drogba and Zouma/Ivan probably made more sense, than adding a young attacking midfielder against those Qpr thugs.

Green shanked his clearance but there was still a lot to do from there. Not like when Courtois gave Hull the easiest goal of the season. Also yes you can't expect teams to always make mistakes, but the bad teams always seem to do. And it's not only against Chelsea.

Your original point was Chelsea are the luckiest team in PL, turning a 0-0 game to 3 points is hardly massively lucky. It's totally different if QPR had dominated the game and somehow lost to a last minute goal. This is the same for all the other games you mentioned, no one did a Tottenham on us and still ended up losing. Chelsea were always in the game and just waited for a mistake to pounce and get the points.

Difference is Arsenal deserved to win that game. Chelsea v QPR was a boring 0-0 game, but they made a crucial mistake at the end to throw the points away.

So 11 game unbeaten is all luck according to you, 5 straight away wins is all luck. Chelsea have not looked like losing in most games this year - no doubt the play has been disjointed due to Fab, Oscar and Matic's drop in form but branding about luck all over the place is ridiculous. Luck is Man utd's win against Arsenal earlier in the season, when they had 1 shot on target and 2 goals after getting dominated for 89 minutes.

He's taken Chelsea from a club turning into Arsenal, to challenging for the title in his first 2 years back. Oh and a CL semi. There will always be things to improve and reasons to complain, but i trust Mourinho to at least fix most of it.

The players can celebrate when the title is officially won, but the trophy will only be handed out on the last day.

He never ever looks like scoring and doesn't even seem to care, it's painful. Ramires at RW is 100 times more dangerous.

And Lionsden was just praising City's approach lol

This is always a problem when we don't play 4231.

Oscar for Willian.

Lol this guy

Which LB's have been better? Azpi is one name i usually see most people agree upon at LB.He had some bad games after coming back from injury, but overall he's been consistently doing the job Mou puts him out there for (with even less help from Hazard this season) And he got some key assists along the way vs Spurs, Liverpool and Villa.

Bolasie and Lloris are good, but not TOTY good lol.

So if Hazard is a midfielder and Neymar a forward, what's the point of even comparing them? IMO both players couldn't be any more different, and could easily play together on the same team. Also, Hazard would be a great fit for most big teams because he's a team player who doesn't obsess about goals. Imagine Benz and Hazard beside Ronaldo, there will never be a game where he doesn't score lol.

Stoke played with 2 strikers and 0 wingers, our defenders mostly had nothing to do lol.

Pardew should get City job lol

Is anyone else reporting this apart from Japanese media?

I still like his movement, he'll get some goals because he isn't static like Willian - and in the few games he has played more than 20 mins, I believe there has been 3-4 times he could have scored. But his weakness on the ball is just funny. Needs to hit the gym and also get more minutes, because he won't get any better with the physicality by observing from the bench.

I always see him backtracking when the opposition enter the Chelsea half, so this is something he does often. I'm sure he was waiting to see if Adam played a through ball and if he could get there. But he instead unleashed a thunderbastard of a shot.

... I love the new haircut btw.

His best game in forever.

Tired Hazard still better than 99% of players in PL.

Holy shit

Hazardous.