Jump to content

didierforever

Member
  • Posts

    11,770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13
  • Country

    India

Everything posted by didierforever

  1. i dont think jose would play 2 21 year olds as his CB pairing.
  2. so tell me how exactly is stones better than zouma. please enlighten us. cos stones is a "ball playing defender". well in 4 matches, everton have conceded atleast 4 goals which were stones' faults (watford embarassment, sterling goal and both the goals today). on the other hand, zouma has put in brilliant performances almost every time he has got a chance. but i would really like to know exactly how stones is better. please go ahead.
  3. if this transfer fucks up zouma's career, i am gonna be royally pissed. i can already see zouma asking for first team chances after being relegated to 4th CB spot sometime around december and then being loaned or sold cos he apparently "did not want to fight for his place in the team".
  4. do u want to take a poll right here and right now asking who was better on the day, rambo or cesc? are u up for it? cesc was hopeless. just cos he had higher touches means he had a good game. hahahahahhaha.. and then people ask why i laughed. awesome. so now suddenly possession is important? the scoreline was 3-0 and a major major major share of blame goes on this bottler. also, what stats did u show me. his touches. since when do touches determine the level of play? is that argument supposed to be even taken seriously? also, get your starts right before making a fool out of yourself 11-12 = 659 minutes (started both the semis against us, both the round of 16 against leverkusen, and the home match against milan) 12-13 = 528 minutes (started the home leg against bayern munich, played 107 minutes (62 and 45) against psg in quarter finals, played 90 minutes in the away leg vs milan) 13-14 = 556 minutes (started both the legs against ATM in qf, started both the legs against man city in round of 16) but apparently cos he did not start against bayern in one match, cesc "ALMOST NEVER STARTED" in barca's CL games. another LOL-MAX opinion. if u remember the CL11-12 semis against barca that chelsea won. cesc started. infact just to accomodate cesc, barca shifted from a well settled 4-3-3 to 3-4-3 and even shifted iniesta onto the wings. so yes, a lot of barca's blame goes on cesc. and surprise surprise... cesc leaves and barca wins the CL. so basically barca has won 3 CLs in 4 years without cesc yet were not even able to get into semis once in 13-14 with him in the team. like i started my previous post with hahahahahhahaha..
  5. whats worse is that the price tag makes it mandatory for us to start him. and the player who should ACTUALLY be starting (zouma) and be our 1st CB would be relegated to 4th CB. this transfer has the capability of doing exactly what torres did to us...
  6. he has not got a red card in 2 years (iirc) for RM playing 7406 minutes of football ,but dont let the facts distort your views. just let the media's potrayal of him as a wild animal help u make all the judgment.
  7. if jose wont drop cesc after the performances he has put right now, he is not dropping cesc ever. i think IF (and this is a massive IF since i dont think we will be able to buy pogba) pogba comes to chelsea, we will shift to 4-3-3. and in that, i dont think oscar would get much of a look in.
  8. if pogba comes, oscar is redundant. totally agree. and willian goes on the bench as a backup to pedro/hazard.
  9. to be honest, it seemed like we were not in for pedro till the last moment. i wont hold it against him. he has been spot on with the chelsea transfer news.
  10. they have have bought 50mil sterling and looking to buy a 56mil kdb and bought 31 mil otamendi. their model might be short term but i think they are willing to give double the investment of any other tea,.
  11. we all are mate. anything to make iva sit on the bench.
  12. for CL club trained JT RLC blackman Homegrown cesc begovic GC stones non-HG costa falcao remy hazard willian pedro oscar matic ramires mikel iva azpi zouma baba courtois traore kenedy
  13. what the fuck!!! this is really happening?
  14. No he is not in bad form. he has been decent. cesc's incompetency has made him look poor.
  15. hahahahahhahaha... our board must be crazy.. marin, salah, cuadrado... loans.. come on big vic.. get urself a loan.
  16. hahahhahahahah... watch a game for a change. rambo's 37 touches were far far far more impressive than cesc's 100 or so shit touches. just like one of those touches was giving the ball away against wba which led to the goal. so yes, i would play rambo every game over cesc, until he learns the basics of being a center midfielder. and if u think he was ok defensively against man city, u are either delusional or you did not watch the match. even cesc's biggest fans wont say he was "average" defensively against city cos he was downright shit. 30th second. silve turned him like he did not exist to put aguero through. defending101, dont give a classy player like silva an inch of space. he gave him half the field. unless cesc stays in our 11 for big games, we have no chance of success in tournaments like CL. infact its hardly shocking that barca went from 2 CLs in 3 years (2009,2011) to none in his 3 years as a barca player cos A. he is shit defensively, B. he is bottler.
  17. list of non HG players courtois iva, azpi, baba, zouma matic, rambo, mikel oscar, hazard, willian, pedro, kenedy costa, falcao, remy. thats still just 16. bego, blackman, aina, GC, JT, cesc, traore (u-21), rlc. thats 8 HG spots.
  18. no he is not. against city he was one of our best players. its cesc thats making him look bad. any person trying to hold the mid alone will look poor. makelele had essien/ballack and lamps along with whom who were all brilliant in every aspect of the game. cesc is so poor defensively that its shocking...
  19. we have conceded 7 goals in 3 matches. creativity should be way down on the priority list. he should be dropped for rambo/oscar (if fit) who are both 100 times better (atleast) defensively than him. whats worse is people think matic is bad/poor. no he is not. he has been made to look that ways cos of cesc's inaptitude in defense. also, lets not make it sound like cesc can magically open up defenses. on his current form, he wont be able to open my universities' defence.
  20. he is the perfect player to bring on in that situation.
  21. what the whoring fucking shit is this? hahahahahha
×
×
  • Create New...