didierforever

we as a team were awful and costa was a major part of why we were awful.

exactly

How did costa fare against city?

well, then his judgement is costing us big time. And if his judgment says that iva is a better RB than axpi, then we need a new manager asap

Fine. Lets take a poll and see how many chelsea fans support jose's decision of continuing to start with iva. Why don't u start a poll and see the results for urself.I am sorry. But are u telling me that its onky my opinion that iva no longer cuts it as a RB? and that azpi is better? Jose is a human too. He can make mistakrs and he is making a lot of mistakes. Simply cos of his favouritism and ego Are u saying that subbing pedro for mikel while shifting cesc on the right to cover for iva was not a mistakr? Well, I have nothing more to say to u, if u can't agree to 1+1 =2 cos jose says its 11

iva is Cb who can play as a RB. Same applies for zouma.

When will it become unbearable? Cos for me it already has. U can't tell me that jose can't see the problem. Its simply his EGO that's stopping jim from making that change which is unacceptable

exactly thats my point. why was iva in the team. if iva was not dropped after the city game, then when will he be dropped. since when do we have to see our manager's stubborness and ego keep costing us?

we won against WBA. wow? should he get a noble prize for that? i guess iva and cesc did not disgrace and embarass us enough at etihad, that we want more proof of their incompetence. sorry, for not enjoying the 3 points when our problems our so glaring even at the start of the season.

iva starts. cesc on the pitch but pedro subbed and cesc plays as a RW. cos he is so super fast and he can cover so brilliantly for iva, right. almost cost us the match and people are praising him for a comment?

another awesome performance.

lol.. i am sure he would have handled rondon better despite having a yard or 2 head start. JT is CLL but high time we play with GC-zouma if we want to play high up the pitch along with cesc in mid who gives no cover whatsoever.

remy - 3rd striker. how many minutes has he got so far in 3 matches. rambo and mikel still cost 34mil together and our 3rd and 4th CMs and the only way they break in is if their is an injury (since apparently cesc is undroppable).

atlast 3 points. but the problems are for all of us to see. jose and his favouritism will be our demise. iva and cesc. why the fuck did they start. why the fuck was cesc on the RW and not pedro when mikel came in. so many problems simply cos jose is too fucking egoisitic and arrogant to admit his mistakes. courtois - good performance. 8/10 iva - hilarious. just LOL. and people see i am over-reacting. i am sorry but say it again. 0/10 zouma -good performance. cant understand how he is not a starter. 8/10 jt - we are blessed that berahino was not playing or he would have ripped JT to pieces. GC should be starting.GC-zouma should be our paitring. 5/10 azpi - another good azpi-ish performance. time to shift to right though. 8/10 matic - well, if u have to play alone in the mid with no support with no one what so ever, u will ;look poor. cant judge him for this match. 6/10 cesc - another lol-max performance. i am sorry but like iva, this is getting simply ridiculous. needs to be benched. pedro - what a performance from the barca reject. 10/10 willian - needs to improve on his finishing. except for that, very good on the pitch. 7/10 hazard - glimpses of the old hazard. but still some way to go. pedro's signing will give him more space to work with. 7/10 costa - one of his decent performances but still poor link up. should have scored a couple more. but overall decent performance. 7/10 subs - GC - should be one half of our CB partnership. end of discusiion. falcao -very poor. needs to show some more movement. that hazard shot, he should have made that far post run. any striker with good instincts would have. mikel -does what he does best. should start the next game. either him or rambo.

bring on mikel... what the fuck are we waiting for??

the difference between cuadrado v costa was the kind of stupid excuses being used. 30 mil euros is too much money for pedro. he is a barca reject. he is already 28. and my favourite, he is not even better than our current RW. all of these were downright stupid excuses from people who clearly know nothing about pedro.,

then play zouma over iva. iva is not even a proper FB, so people cant even use the excuse of not playing a CB as a RB cos thats exactly what we are currently doing. also,december? really? look at pedro today and tell me a player needs 4 months to get acclimitized. also, the way we use our LB, baba should not have much problem. also, i am not going over board. no sane person who has chelsea as his first priority over ivanovic would have started iva, and why can be seen even from this match.

another shit performance so far.

so where are the geniuses who did not want to spend 30mil euros for pedro? show of hands idiots!!!

Oh look, another goal down the fucking rigjt hand side... how fucking surprising..

http://www.whoscored.com/Players/78498/History/Romelu-Lukaku http://www.whoscored.com/Players/24248/History/Diego-Costa kep passes per games dont seem to be that much different do they for 2014-15? costa has 20 goals and 4 assists, lukaku has 18 goals and 7 assists. but the dispossessed stats are ridiculously hihg for costa, are not they? as are bad control per games. infact these stats seem pretty explanatory.

sterling and sanchez are the main men for arsenal and pool (last season). they had the license to take on players on the wings so as to open defences. costa and lukaku comparision is pretty much the case of comparing 2 strikers who can score goals but have some problems with their back to the goal despite their enormous size.,

i have watched many everton days, and i can easily say that his "technical ability" is not half as poor as those comments on there. infact, we can even see the stats to say that his "so called elephant's first touch" is better than our no.1 striker's.

he can score a bloody hattrick and it still does not justify his selection.

ivanovic is not a full back. he is a CB playing as a FB. we can play zouma there who has already played there for etienne. so sorry, not buying this excuse. also, baba is not fit, fine. is iva? is cesc?