didierforever

Great. Now he is officially "injury prone". Which club in their right mind would buy him.

Done

25 MIL for morata??? Seriously??? Damn!!!!

So who is older? Chelsea the club or ETOO???

One of my friends (arsenal fan) told me that they have signed MORATA. How true???

When did I say he is in the same league as modric,kroos, bastian??? The only reason I keep bringing up lars is cos he is GOOD and a very gettable target compared to vidal, pogba, witsel who won't just cost us a fortune but most of them won't be willing to move.Also how can u say he does not have vision. Plus how many of the midfielders except for modric take on 2 or 3 players and dribble past them. Dint know we wanted iniesta for that matter. I for one have never seen bastian do that, or khedira for that matter. Even our own super frank for that matter. Since when does dribbling become this big a criteria. Leave that to the hazards and oscars and willians. What should be the most importabt criteria is quick, workrate, passing thru the channels. He is good in all. Add to that that he is just 24. I don't see how he would not make the grade here.

That's what my point is. I always thought ans still do that lars is very good techinically. Everytime I have seen him play, its what he does on the ball has impressed me as well as what he has done off the ball. Not the case with rambo. Specially last season when schurrle used to play uptop with keisling while bender-rolfes/reinartz in thw cwnter, sometimes in a 2 sometimes in a 3 man midfield.. It was his ability to drive the team forward that sets him out. He is very different from sven in that regards who is actually pretty limited in his passing.

true. Mvg might very well turn out to be similar to lars. But its just weird how underrated lars' technical ability seems to be here.Anyways don't think any of the big names (kroos, vidal, pogba, witsel) will be possible to buy. We might very well end up getting a matic/rambo/mvg/romeu pivot options.

What the F??? we have torres, ba , etoo, marin , moses, kakuta, mikel, lamps, bertrand, cole , pva and add to that we might very well sell luiz and cech/courtois. But u want to sell the lynchpin of this team and system. What more u want to sell him for 40mil but replace him with another 40mil rated draxler/isco/kroos. Where is the sensr in this?,,

Fucking cunts. What a double whaammy!!! City will play atleast 2 matches less than expected, arsenal will be favourites to win the trophy. Anyways I hope this helps people understand how beatable city are. The exaggeration concwrning them is simply outrageous.

isco is not half of what oscar is physically. This is a pkayer who has been benched by a right winger for a rcm position. Sane goes for draxler. Not anywhere near oscar in physicality. Dude have u seen us pkay this season???? At ALL??? Do you have a clue how pivotal oscar is to mourinho's system??? Oscar has had a very average 2-3 months but this selling him for 40mil talk while buying draxker (who was allegedly wanted by arsenal but a 40mil bid was turned down) is utter rubbish.

decent. Did well on the first half. But stopped running in the second half. Just got subbed off. Just one poor moment where he gave the ball away about 30 yards away from the goal.

Good so far except for that one moment

Do u mean to say that none of our players except for the ones actually scoring the goals had anything to do since all the 4 goals were defensive mistakes???

And it is city vs arsenal. Thank u god!!!!!

hmmm. Maybe. But we have a game against arse at SB. Our form at SB coupled with jose record against the voyeur makes it for a good night. Don't see them as much of a threat.

ezcept for changing the whole dynamic of the game!!!

I hope for a city v arsenal semi. A bit more headache fir city.

Iva came for 10mil and azpi for 7mil

We dint sell mata to psg for 40mil but we ll sell oscar around whom jose is building the team for the same amount!!! If the transfer rumor can be so kiddish, why not tge other BS stories n expectation.

no u r not alone.

Not over- ratong city but they do have a shot. Barca are in a rut. Pathetic form. They were OUTPLAYED against sociedad, they could create one chancr against valladolid yeaterday. Even in their home match agaibst almeria, they could so easily have conceded when the acore was 2-1 to drop points before puyol scored and settled the match in the last minutes. Also its not fair to compare city' s away league record in PL for this match. They will be the ones coubtering being the threat on set pieces, using pace against barca and with aguero they might just pull off an upset. I won't say a 3-1 win is impossible.

2 games to be precise. Away to wba and away to fulham.Hardly a fair sample of matches to judge how successful a combo is. But I admit these 2 are not creative togwther. Specially at home we might have a hard time breaking down small teams. but away from home, their might not be a better one. Physical, tackling, Breaking up play and countering using rambo's pace.

dude, out of all the arguments, atleast no one brought in maths!!!! i can wager whatever u want on city dropping points, can u wager city winning all 12 of their matches since all of your argument was simply based on THAT ONE THING. atleast i am not arguing on just one case scenrio but rather what i expect to happen!!! also i have already said why "its our title to lose" but just addressed the maths issue cos it simply dint seem right to me. anyways lets agree to disagree.

so u mean to say, that after 20 matches if arsenal was top of the table with a 4 point cushion then the LEAGUE IS THEIRS TO LOSE cos we simply cant take into account the fixtures, the fixture pile-up, the pressure of the title etc etc. cos they might simply win all their matches and give no one a chance. the point is football is NOT MATHS. player down, down on aggregate, with no CBs, losing 2-0 at the best team in the world's home will almost always equate to a DRUBBING of the losing team in an idealistic 2+2=4 world, but that is not how football works. mathematically, even united can win the league but unfortunately none of us consider that, do we? also, i am not trying to convince any1 here. i gave my opinion and was quoted by people saying almost the same thing, and hence i replied back giving my point of view.