didierforever
Everything posted by didierforever
-
have you ever seen turan play??? there is no comparision between the 2 players defensively as willian is a complete work horse but turan is a brilliant RW/forward. i honestly doubt you have seen either of koke/turan play if you say something like "the grass is greener on the other side of the fence",
-
ATM "park the bus" as much as chelsea do. the difference is, koke and turan and greizemann are brilliant in counters. there decision making is a 100 times better than willian/oscar, their vision is a 100 times better than willian and oscar and their ball retention under pressure is better than willian and oscar. ps - so there u go, koke will be a lot more suited to our "system" than oscar.
-
the difference is that hazard was a newbie and that too a 21 year old newbie player. i simply dont believe that when we had bought hazard, we would have given him 185kpw. on the other hand, if you ask me now, i think hazard might be earning 200kpw cos he is one of the best players in the world and without the doubt the best in PL. same goes for rooney. jose had made it a 100% clear that we wanted rooney. that was when (i think) that rooney signed a new contract which was already 200+kpw, so it makes sense that he might be making that insane money.
-
so simeone does not "park the bus"?? what exactly did he do against barca in CL last season or RM in the final or against juve or etv etc etc.. ATM "park the bus" as much as chelsea do. the difference is, koke and turan and greizemann are brilliant in counters. there decision making is a 100 times better than willian/oscar, their vision is a 100 times better than willian and oscar and their ball retention under pressure is better than willian and oscar. ps - so there u go, koke will be a lot more suited to our "system" than oscar.
-
i wont be surprised. young "english" player who has some credentials. so even if in reality it is 20-80 in favor of eden, i expect kane to get the poty.
-
20mil and he is yours.
-
yes he does. koke is an exceptional player. he has everything in his arsenal that oscar has (workrate and defending) along with an immense range of passing and good vision, quick one touch passing. his set piece delivery is one of the best i have seen.
-
spurs and arsenal... time for a bidding war!!! and the bidding starts from 20mil atleast!!!
-
his contract got renewed so it would make sense to remove a couple of clauses. also, hazard making 200k was just media nonsense.
-
round of 16 in CL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> winning europa. so no, it does not make the 12-13 season better than 13-14. it does not even come close for me. again, you seem to be counting "dark" times in silverware and trophies, i am not. from 2006-09 we were one of the powerhouses in european football. the atmosphere, the directionlessness, the performances by the players, the club's insistence with torres, that is all that makes me think of 12-13 as the dark times. a simple question, if jose had not been available at that point of time, who would we have got as our manager. FSW was tagged as "interim" and moreover he did not do anything to guarantee an extension. that was the state of the club then. we were desperate and should count our blessings that in our direst need, we got the best manager of the world.
-
i am sorry but i dont agree with anything. how was rdm wrong? what did fsw do that rdm did not? did we see fsw give us an identity? make us defensively solid? give us a platform to build our next season? we were 2nd in PL with 4 points behind united which included one of the most biased refreed games i have seen in football (against united at home). in CL, we had a tough group and we got owned. but dont forget that we were almost knocked out of the group stages the year ago too. also, against the supposed united reserves did not we play the likes of bertrand, romeu, moses, sturridge, piazon, azpi (who was far from a starter at that point of time).
-
i think u misunderstood me. it was not before. i am talking about the 11-12 season where we won the fa and CL double with almost the same group of 10-11 players. the only players to have a substantial amount of contribution who were not in our 10-11 squad was mata and even his was minimal. the 12-13 period for me was the darkest era. firing our cl winning manager when we were 2nd in PL coupled with fsw's appointment, our absolute lack of identity, half hearted displays, asenine subs, that performance against QPR at home, idiotic transfers like marin and average ones like moses. all in all, it looked the bleakest moment for me,
-
i agree about no inspiration and excitement. but dont forget that when that same group of players were given the motivation, we won an fa cup and CL double. that team had character and balls.
-
not even close. our 12/13 team was without a doubt the worst in roman era
-
defensively azpi IS light years better
-
there is always hope that jose somehow sees what is so evident.
-
best case scenario for sales cech - 15mil moses - 10mil mikel - 8mil romeu/mvg - 5mil ramires - 15mil oscar - 30mil kakuta - 2mil marin - 3mil so about 90mil. which would be like half the messi's transfer value. neither bale nor messi is a realistic option.
-
why? we have azpi who is light years better.
-
another average player. we have willian, cuadrado for RW. so please no.
-
and that is never going to happen. so in short, FFP is useless.
-
no one has the money to buy messi, unless RM come with a 200mil offer for hazard. koke = 45mil varane = 25mil bale = 75mil close to 150mil of spendings. never going to happen. moreover, buying koke/pogba and varane and selling deadwoods like oscar will be more than enough to take us a step further.
-
we cant say anything to RM about it. we bought luis for 16mil and he is rotting on the bench
-
need to make a decision on marin, moses, mvg, romeu, salah. taking up a massive space on our ffp table while giving us nothing.
-
and rightly so. perez should get the credit/critique about the RM transfers. honestly, selling ADM and alonso for james is an asenine transfer. meanwhile, our board should get the credit for the amount that we spend or receive in the transfer, but our targets would without a doubt be defined by jose.
-
i am happy for you if u can make sense of it cos honestly i cant. we bought willian after having mata, schurrle as winger options cos jose was not happy with what we had. and then we sold mata. similarly, we bought salah cos we sold mata and kdb. we bought cuadrado, cos we sold schurrle. "spending" is not an independent event. atleast not in this case scenario. also, how many matches did schurlle play as a LW and how many as a RW, cos as far as i remember, most of his starts have been as a sub. schurrle was not a RW for us. its like saying willian is a CAM for us just cos thats his main position.
