didierforever

we would get a clear indication of what jose means to do with oscar by what we do in the summer. if we actually go after koke/pogba, it will be quite evident that jose wants oscar gone cos koke/pogba will be a sure starter and dropping cesc for oscar would be something that even an imbecile would not do. if we buy someone like schneiderlein, we can will know that we are SCREWED.

what? you do understand that jose is replacing those players that he is selling. jose replaced mata,kdb, luiz, torres, etc etc, with the players that he has bought. if he had thought that these players were good enough, he would not have had to "SPEND" that money. so i am sorry, but just counting the money "SPENT" makes no sense to me whatsoever. i mean zouma in for luiz was as direct a replacement as their could possibly be. luiz was sold for 50mil and zouma brought in for 11 mil, so its a pretty okay to say that we made 39 mil and got a better CB for our system of play. so i just dont understand how we can only include the "spent" and neglect the "sold". in short, jose has spent a total of 45mil pounds since coming here in 4 transfer windows and taken a barely qualifying for CL team to a comfortably PL-winning team.

so now deco's comments should be taken as the word of god?? http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/liverpool-star-raheem-sterling-better-5471361owen says sterling is way better than ozil and its not even debatable. well, i guess that settles it for once and all does not it? as far as LOLcar is concerned, he has to be sold. he can go to some mickey mouse competition like serie a and play from some mickey mouse team.

i remember when i had said a similar thing during december or so and i got castrated.

Will Eden Hazard win the PFA Players' Player of the Year award this season? Yes - he's the best player on the best team in PL No - I accidentally clicked no because there's no reason for saying no.

nope. for than 6mil pounds.

i thought koke's price was 44mil pounds itself. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/567433/Chelsea-Transfer-News-Koke-Bale http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/11505660/Chelsea-transfer-news-and-rumours-Jose-Mourinho-ready-to-make-44m-bid-for-Atletico-Madrid-midfielder-Koke.html http://metro.co.uk/2015/03/31/chelsea-ready-to-grab-44m-koke-transfer-as-barcelona-ditch-interest-5128358/ and reus has to be atleast 50mil pounds.

no penatly for costa against soton(H) yet penalty for soton for the same foul against mane no penalty for us against soton(A) (i think that is the same as cesc booking)

his proudest moment in a chelsea shirt!!!

??? koke = 44mil, reus = 50mil. it will be close to 100mil.

i cant believe i had spent about 4 pages arguing about romeu with someone. still dont understand this transfer or mvg's for that matter or marin.

atlast jose is doing something about the situation. "not good enough" - simple as that.

just one question dude, you still believe anything that jose says about our transfers? case in point, costa and cesc were bought this season and rank among the top3 players of our FFP database (according to WAGNH). and those amounts are massive. lets say we buy pogba for 50mil and 6mil per year, that would be 16mil per year on FFP criteria compared to costa's 16mil and cesc's 14mil. so dont think thats much of an issue.

during the times we were in for cavani and falcao, we had bought the likes of hazard, oscar, moses, marin, azpi - upto 75 to 80mil of transfers. last to last summer we were in for a 30mil rooney despite buying schurrle and mvg. dont think we were in for either of them this summer after buying costa. infact we have enough funds to buy a player like pogba. right now, we wont be needing a squad signing, we have an army of loanees and buying the likes of a schurrle and mvg would do us no good what so ever. we just need 2 players to have a near perfect squad CM - pogba/koke - 50mil CB - varane - 30mil 2nd GK - freidel,green, ruddy - 5mil (max) 85mil for these players can be easily paid just by our own sales cech - 10mil mikel - 5mil cahill - 10mil oscar - 20mil thorgan - 6mil atsu - 2mil salah - 10mil pasalic - 2mil kalas - 2mil omerou - 2mil josh - 1mil kakuta- 1mil piazon -3mil romeu -2mil marin - 2mil wallace - 2mil. 80mil atleast and these are easily the minimum we would get out of these players. add to that our new yokohama deal, CL money, PL money... we have more than sufficient amount. squad - GKs - courtois, 2nd GK, blackman(HG) Defenders - JT (HG), zouma(under-21),varane, iva, azpi, luis, christensen (HG), ake(HG) CM/DMs - matic, pogba(HG, i think), rambo, mvg, RLC(HG) AMs - cesc(HG), hazard, willian, cuadrado, bertrand(under-21),?(under-21) strikers - costa, remy, bamford(HG). definitely better than this season's squad and more importantly, it does not mean that our starting 11 becomes the same as last season with no competition like city's.

agree with most of the names on the list but dont agree with bamford. selling bamford would be like saying this to our youth system "you can do what you want, but you are all expendable, irrespective of how well you perform"

it would be an absolute shame if remy leaves after performing so well every time he has been given a start.

koke and pogba is OVERKILL. how will we line up? costa hazard-cesc-koke pogba-matic well, that team would easily be comparable to the best in the world without a shread of doubt. also. ps - koke's BO is 44mil pounds and pogba will cost more than 50mil pounds atleast.

1 more point gained over the chasing pack. just need to beat the arse-anals and we have all but won the league.

city will again be getting a transaction. dont think they can buy both. meanwhile, we are in a much better position financially.

cesc was good in the cup final? i honestly dont think so. we are pretty much going to set up the same way. especially against arsenal who need a win while a draw for us against them is as good as a win. if he is not suited to the play then we might as well give players a chance who is.

I don't think that's crazy at all. Yes, cesc is a creative player but tell me when has his creativeness given us an edge in a big match. From the recent past I can think of psg both legs, pool both legs, spurs final, city home game , spurs defeat. In all these matches, I can barely think of things that cesc did. Even when united were down in the dumpers, he got owned by fellaini. As for "deserving" to start, u r right but aimply cos we have no depth. Oscar and cuadrado barely look like pro players at the moment, which leaves us with Rambo-matic Willian-cesc-hazard As the only option. But cesc in the pivot is a no-no-no. Almost evrytime he has played in the pivot in a big game, we have been over run, be it by the likes of mason and bentelab or by a 10 men psg.

looking like a bad transfer. but lets give him some time and a pre-season. hopefully he can do something of what he did in WC last year.

they have a game against us and considering jose's record against whineger, i dont even care about arse-anals.

i want slippy G to give us a guard of honor which means that we have to win all of our next 5 games and city have to drop points in the coming 5 games. so come on palace, come on united.

who? what?