Ok..... 13 in 25 for Belgium, 30+ goal involvements in two separate seasons, etc. People like to shit on him like he's Jo. Jesus is massively superior because he plays OK in one of the best attacking sides in Europe? I'll leave you to have your opinion & my hilarious one will also remain. [emoji1360] They certainly are. Breaking or getting around almost all financial rules does have its perks.
We need a presence upfront & Jesus doesn't provide that. So do I. Ban or not, neither of them should be at the club come August (Giroud has made his stance known).
The train for Cavani is long gone. I'd still like the club go after Jovic's current strike partner, Haller. We need to stop overspending on names and go for someone with a decent track record thus far. He'll probably be the cheapest option amongst the names mentioned too.
I was talking about Mariano. Rodrygo, Vinicius, Hazard & Asensio vying to play in their preferred position? The club don't have a natural plan during these transfer sprees. It helps when there is only one other club to compete in the market domestically.
People kept saying (including his father) that playing time was key. He wasn't starting ahead of Suarez and I don't see him starting ahead of Benzema. Also, a deal to sign Rodrygo is all but a done and Diaz was brought back to the club last summer. Weird decision if that really was the deciding factor, as he'll effectively be vying with 3 other strikers at Real.
Cesc wasn't that bad in that role and did little to nothing off the ball. I just think we need to keep away from any idea that doesn’t revolve around a natural 9.
Buying strikers past their peak. Imagine if someone told us 15 years ago the list of CF's bound to play for the club (Shev, Torres, Eto'o, Higuain & Pato to an extent). The club just don't when to pull the trigger.
I'm saying the player could have informed people close to the team and it has trickled down. The pictures speak for themselves (almost identical to CHO).
Going by what was said prematch, Roman is actually to blame for the fixture happening in the first place. Agreeing to stipulations against nobodies is what baffles me. Club in a nutshell, though.
All first team players on the trip made an appearance, so I think it's quite clear we were contractual obliged to field them. I just don't known what clown would agree to that. Fielding a strong XI for one half is one thing, but having to field an entire squad is beyond farcical.
Sarri didn't want this game to be played as much as us. Game shouldn't have been planned with the possibility of finals on the horizon. What would have happened if we were in the FA Cup final?