Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    11665

  • Laylabelle

    4980

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2646

1 hour ago, communicate said:

Did Van Djik hand the ball? If he did the goal need to be chalked off. What is the difference in that than mount offside against Liverpool. 

yes he did

and Klopp had the brass balls to say that Victimpool DESERVED the no call because of how they have been unfairly treated by the officials and VAR this year!!!!!!!!!!

truly insane!!!

It is Trumpian level gaslighting

just make shit up, lie, and then make that the base narrative of any and all that follows after

Image result for Van Dijk hand the ballImage result for Van Dijk hand the ball

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, communicate said:

Did Van Djik hand the ball? If he did the goal need to be chalked off. What is the difference in that than mount offside against Liverpool. 

Anthony 'The Walking Bellend' Taylor told the Wolves players that (GET THIS AND THINK BACK TO THAT AZPI OFFSIDE 15 PLUS SECONDS BEFORE OUR GOAL WAS CHALKED OFF AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SEASON) any offence had taken place too early in the move before the goal.

 

#LiVARpool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Anthony 'The Walking Bellend' Taylor told the Wolves players that (GET THIS AND THINK BACK TO THAT AZPI OFFSIDE 15 PLUS SECONDS BEFORE OUR GOAL WAS CHALKED OFF AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SEASON) any offence had taken place too early in the move before the goal.

 

#LiVARpool

Lol, nope that one is the same situation as mount offside. If they chalked off mount, they need to chalked off vvd. Vvd receive the ball, and made long pass. That is one phase. 

My opinion both are perfectly fine goals. Mount was clearly offside but it didn't affect Liverpool defense whatsoever. Vvd one was also fine imo. 

But the moment you chalked off Mount goal then pool goal need to be annulled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, communicate said:

Lol, nope that one is the same situation as mount offside. If they chalked off mount, they need to chalked off vvd. Vvd receive the ball, and made long pass. That is one phase. 

My opinion both are perfectly fine goals. Mount was clearly offside but it didn't affect Liverpool defense whatsoever. Vvd one was also fine imo. 

But the moment you chalked off Mount goal then pool goal need to be annulled. 

3 big differences

1 VVD handball was almost directly followed by the goal and significantly aided it, our offside was not in a linear straightway action

2 handball is handball, it is not a situational spatial infraction

3 our goal was chalked off, the dippers was allowed

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, communicate said:

Did Van Djik hand the ball? If he did the goal need to be chalked off. What is the difference in that than mount offside against Liverpool. 

Difference? ONe is being helped big time game after game to ensure they lift the title and the other is the hated Chels.

10 hours ago, Vesper said:

yes he did

and Klopp had the brass balls to say that Victimpool DESERVED the no call because of how they have been unfairly treated by the officials and VAR this year!!!!!!!!!!

truly insane!!!

It is Trumpian level gaslighting

just make shit up, lie, and then make that the base narrative of any and all that follows after

Image result for Van Dijk hand the ballImage result for Van Dijk hand the ball

 

Cant stand klopp, such a rat he has become. He is no more than a victim like the rest of them. VAR has leterally helped him all season game after game and he comes out with BS like that? WHat dimension are these fuckers from ffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From another forum:

For every other teams in the league, VAR is used to check every aspect of the goal for a reason to be ruled out. For Liverpool, the people running VAR just happily overlook the incidents and award the goal. VanDik paused for a second after the ball hit his arm, even he knew he got a handball, and that touch of Allana would be called accident handball if was player any other teams. There you have it, title awarded, signed FA.

Most have realised what a farce this is now, thank you VAR fro bringing the obvious to the masses. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The commentators here have had enough of this farce, they just cant tolerate it anymore. Its a fucking farce cuz epl is a farce. The rules are made up as they go along. Pool and spurs have benefited the most of var, then utd.

Epl is so corrupt, its as obvious as day light and yet some are adament all is ok and well. What will it take for people to admit var is legal match fixing ffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...