Jump to content

Roman wants Jose back?


Rambo
 Share

Recommended Posts

LOL delusion.

I gave no 'different outlook', my principal view didn't change anywhere. I merely expanded upon my previous comment.

You are the only one who replied to my specific posts. I don't know why you fail to see what I've put there in clear words. Can't help you with that mate.

You expanded because I quetioned you, so you then gave some logical reasons why Jose came & because I've exposed that you now resort to jibes such as deluded which means you are losing face.

I merely pointed out that if you would of added you're 2 posts together I was referring to then I wouldn't of questioned you in the first place, but never mind I suppose this is a forum where people are going to disagree...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You expanded because I quetioned you, so you then gave some logical reasons why Jose came & because I've exposed that you now resort to jibes such as deluded which means you ate losing face.

I gave a logical reason in the very beginning, but I suppose for you, only stuff you want to hear equals logic. This very conclusion of yours explains why I called you deluded. Nothing personal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gave a logical reason in the very beginning, but I suppose for you, only stuff you want to hear equals logic. This very conclusion of yours explains why I called you deluded. Nothing personal.

Now if you are referring to a previous post 'at the beginning' which means before my first post yesterday then like I said yesterday I havnt read it & like I said yesterday people have selective memorys but I'm being called deluded because you're original post that I am referring to is very vague. Even if you are referring to another post then why make another one that accuses Jose of only coming to manage us was for the lure of Romans millions? If you have stated something already then why bring it up again but in a very vague way?

I think you will argue for the sake of trying to be proved right even though you know you are in the wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you are referring to another post then why make another one that accuses Jose of only coming to manage us was for the lure of Romans millions? If you have stated something already then why bring it up again but in a very vague way?

Ugh, last time.

I said in my first post today about Roman's money luring Jose. That is my main view, which I added upon when you asked me. I didn't change my view at all, merely augmented it. I brought it up again because you asked me about it again. Didn't do so on my own accord. How am I being vague?

This is getting very repetitive, I hope I made myself clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, last time.

I said in my first post today about Roman's money luring Jose. That is my main view, which I added upon when you asked me. I didn't change my view at all, merely augmented it. I brought it up again because you asked me about it again. Didn't do so on my own accord. How am I being vague?

This is getting very repetitive, I hope I made myself clear.

WTF, Its got repetitive because you don't take in anything that I post, you must like the sound of you're own voice!,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here here!

It doesn't matter how Mourinho did it, or if he only did it because of the money blah blah point is that he did it, and he gave the club the title it had been waiting 50 years for.

Agreed.

My first and hopefully my only post on this topic...

Facts first and these are actually facts .

Jose was successful in bringing us our first top league title .in 50 years

he then won a second ,,,something we hadnt done before or since.

He has delivered trophies wherever he has been .

he has won league titles in 3 different countries...

Those are all FACTS ...

These are opinions ...note the difference Henriques .

I don.t contribute to the school of thought that calls his football boring , He is a pragmatist rather than an idealist . His aim is to win ...beautiful

flowing football if it wont win will be rejected by him ..

During his second season with us I sometimes wished for a more expansive style which wasnt always forthcoming.

The boring tag was given by the media , Remember they even put a reward out for the first player to score against us.

His rows with authority did damage our image but many other managers have been equally as bad .

Im not paranoid but I do believe there is a Media agenda ,,,seeing us upset their "Red favourites" Jose and all things Chelsea were a natural target.

Jose is a Chelsea legend ,,,he has written large parts of our history .

But he is history and we have moved on and there should be no turning back.

I hope Carlo stays but if he does leave I would prefer a new coach and not Jose to return...

:D Superb post, zolayes. Wholeheartedly concur with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You