Lay off Kalou and Anelka

[Wilson 358]

Wow, they are not at their best just now I know. SO FUCK, GET OVER IT EVERY PLAYER HAS A BAD FUCKING RUN!!!!!!

[zolayes 14,489]

Wow, they are playing nit at their best! SO FUCK, GET OVER IT EVERY PLAYER HAS A BAD FUCKING RUN!!!!!!

agree ..but this post will only bring back the haters ...

[Wilson 358]

Good, because then I can tell them where to go lol. Just pisses me off how they can love them when they score etc and then when they have a bad game, they think they shouln't be playing for us! Fucking idiots.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Badboy took his reaction a bit out of hand.

But come on, there's nothing wrong with criticising your own players if you don't think they're good enough for the club, i.e. Kalou.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I agree that we should be able to criticise players when they perform badly.

But no-one's performing to the best of their ability right now as far as I'm concerned, but we don't see posts slagging off Ashley Cole, Drogba or Essien despite them not pulling their weight.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

But no-one's performing to the best of their ability right now as far as I'm concerned, but we don't see posts slagging off Ashley Cole, Drogba or Essien despite them not pulling their weight.

Agree about the bad patch, but we've seen the best of Ash, Drog and Essien before it. With players like Kalou (again, imo) I don't think he's good enough. Last season I didn't think so either. Now obviously I'm not going to go and make a thread dedicated to slagging him off.. But we're not (well mostly,) "haters", just being honest

[zolayes 14,489]

criticism is fine if backed up by more that just rhetoric(or foul language) ...Kalou does often lose possession ,but also is good positionally. Also 3rd best goals to minutes ratio in the PL

[Styles 9,790]

I agree, Anelka is definitely nowhere near his best. Hopefully his form picks up.

Kalou's best however isn't good enough. I'm hoping that he is let go in the summer.

[neel 257]

Kalou never disappoints me because I never had any expectation on him. But anelka is a different player. He gave a great service to us. Intelligent player with lots of skills. Every chelsea fan must be thankful for his service. But nothing lasts forever. He past his prime. He should go and club should move forward.

[Kostas 1,468]

Kalou isn't even a footballer. Most of the critisism he's gotten is fair,valid and perfectly justifiable after 4 seasons of shit.

However knowing his abilities you can hardly blame him cause he rarely underperforms.

Think Badboy was drunk in that thread though.

[ZanSnake 1,211]

Anelka is a striker and has the odd superb game as the right winger.

Kalou is a striker but WAS a winger. I would expect Kalou to give some kind of advantage in that area then Anleka but it seems, imo, that it isn't really possible. Kalou has got some kind of talent, but like i have said many times before, he isn't 'Chelsea' level. We need a player that can be a bright spark when the fire is dull, and Kalou is mainly just another flame when the fire is fuming. When the team performs to their best, Kalou takes advantage and gets a goal or even shows some kind of 'talent' but when the team is rigid or isn't to the full par, he is just another face among the long line miss firing.

I would prefer playing Sturridge, who has brilliant talent as a striker and his dribbling ability has increased in just ONE season (shown in the CL match) and his shooting ability is another attribute which has improved (Pre-season against Ajax). Hell, when he was playing for the dark side (Citeh) his dribbling skills was immense.

But the major thing about it all is that both players are better as strikers then they are as right wingers, and the only person (from my knowledge) that is an ACTUAL right winger is Kakuta. If we kept Stoch, maybe we would have more options. Hell, if Benayoun wasn't injured, we would have more options. But the overall fact is that, Anelka and Kalou are the only players that will play on the right wing, as Carlo is convinced that they are the players that are best.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Anelka is a striker and has the odd superb game as the right winger.

Kalou is a striker but WAS a winger. I would expect Kalou to give some kind of advantage in that area then Anleka but it seems, imo, that it isn't really possible. Kalou has got some kind of talent, but like i have said many times before, he isn't 'Chelsea' level. We need a player that can be a bright spark when the fire is dull, and Kalou is mainly just another flame when the fire is fuming. When the team performs to their best, Kalou takes advantage and gets a goal or even shows some kind of 'talent' but when the team is rigid or isn't to the full par, he is just another face among the long line miss firing.

I would prefer playing Sturridge, who has brilliant talent as a striker and his dribbling ability has increased in just ONE season (shown in the CL match) and his shooting ability is another attribute which has improved (Pre-season against Ajax). Hell, when he was playing for the dark side (Citeh) his dribbling skills was immense.

But the major thing about it all is that both players are better as strikers then they are as right wingers, and the only person (from my knowledge) that is an ACTUAL right winger is Kakuta. If we kept Stoch, maybe we would have more options. Hell, if Benayoun wasn't injured, we would have more options. But the overall fact is that, Anelka and Kalou are the only players that will play on the right wing, as Carlo is convinced that they are the players that are best.

Brilliant post.

[BRMC 12]

While we are on the subject of not good enough players... >>>>>imo<<<<< Kakuta is the worst youngster i have seen in years at Chelsea, not his fault though its just people went way overboard expecting him to be the next messi which unfortunately has driven me to the point of hating him and wish he would leave our club..

As for Kalou he is great

[chelsea blue 615]

Kalou isn't even a footballer. Most of the critisism he's gotten is fair,valid and perfectly justifiable after 4 seasons of shit.

However knowing his abilities you can hardly blame him cause he rarely underperforms.

Think Badboy was drunk in that thread though.

Kalouless get rid of him

[Term-X 7,891]

GET OVER IT EVERY PLAYER HAS A BAD FUCKING RUN!!!!!!

Lmao, then Kalou's had a 4 year bad run.

[DYC. 7,542]

''he isn't 'Chelsea' level. We need a player that can be a bright spark when the fire is dull, and Kalou is mainly just another flame when the fire is fuming. When the team performs to their best, Kalou takes advantage and gets a goal or even shows some kind of 'talent' but when the team is rigid or isn't to the full par, he is just another face among the long line miss firing.

I would prefer playing Sturridge, who has brilliant talent as a striker and his dribbling ability has increased in just ONE season (shown in the CL match) and his shooting ability is another attribute which has improved (Pre-season against Ajax). Hell, when he was playing for the dark side (Citeh) his dribbling skills was immense.''

I can't imagine how incredibly frustated Sturridge must be.

[Badboy 1,526]

I do not understand how a player that can not even execute the basics in football can play for Chelsea Fc. This clown has been playing for us since 2006 and he still looks like he is adapting to a new league. He is a complete waste of space and we look like we are playing with 10 men when is is on the right wing. He has been with us for 4 years and its time to move on Salomon because you are fucking wank ! The man looks like he has got 2 left feet, he is as uncomfortable on the ball as a lanky target man !

[Kostas 1,468]

This thread is going to haunt us when he scores his next tap-in