Jump to content

The Pub - Discuss Anything


Manuf
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not going to drink for a while. I woke up on Thursday feeling like a needed a new liver. Not nice at all.

Besides it hurts my wallet.

A trick I use while at parties is to only drink one glass per hour, and to stay well hydrated: for every glass of alchohol, I drink a glass of water. This really makes deminishes the effects of a hangover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A trick I use while at parties is to only drink one glass per hour, and to stay well hydrated: for every glass of alchohol, I drink a glass of water. This really makes deminishes the effects of a hangover.

Thanks for the advice.

I normally never get hangovers, but when I do...oh boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A trick I use while at parties is to only drink one glass per hour, and to stay well hydrated: for every glass of alchohol, I drink a glass of water. This really makes deminishes the effects of a hangover.

For me its like this: If I knock down 4-5 beers, I'll have a full bottle of water before bed. Keeps me hangover free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me its like this: If I knock down 4-5 beers, I'll have a full bottle of water before bed. Keeps me hangover free.

I once tried the "myth" that you can cure a hangover with alchohol, and it actually worked for a couple of hours, but after that it was hell!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys, what do you think of my first assignment for uni? Submitted it a few days ago, yet to receive a mark for it. I'm hoping for something between Distinction to High Distinction (75-85%):

Was the Harappan Civilisation in the Indus Valley a state-level society like contemporary Mesopotamia and Egypt?

The Harappan Civilisation was a state-level society comparable to contemporary Mesopotamia and Egypt. State-level society can be defined as a complex society with a multi-layered or hierarchical government, as well as the presence of a ruling class, urbanised centres, non-agricultural specialists, literacy and taxation, wealth accumulation and trade. Since the Harappan’s satisfy the definition of ‘civilized’ as defined by Childe, they can be compared as an equal to contemporary state-level societies.

The presence of the ruling class in Harappa was crucial to the everyday running of the state. Since the Harappan’s did not utilise a monarchical political structure, it fell to the elite to manage the state. The presence of large buildings, compared to the uniform ‘suburban’ housing found in Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro indicates the rise and dominance of a ruling class. This can be directly compared with Mesopotamians and Egyptians, in both of which the ruling classes also found it appropriate to live apart from the general populace in larger buildings that indicated their status. Therefore, society and politics were stratified, as it can be derived from these findings that if the ruling classes saw fit to not live amongst the general population, then they would not have been given significant political rights either. The Harappan Civilisation can therefore be considered a state, despite the lack of what many scholars (Shaffer cited in Posserl, 1998) deem essential for consideration as a state- the presence of a king. Despite this, the sheer size of the cities and the comparatively healthy skeletal remains of Harappans’ from urban centres indicate that the society needed to have a complex structure of organisation or the peoples’ health would have declined and the general progress of the state would have been halted at the level of a chiefdom (Shaffer cited in Posserl, 1998), therefore the Harappan’s were comparable politically to Mesopotamia and Egypt.

The most defining characteristic of the Harappan civilisation is the presence of its highly urbanised cities. At the time, Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro were the largest cities on the planet based on both population and area, while the other centres also had populations above 10,000. This cannot be compared to Mesopotamia or Egypt, as neither of the two civilisations possessed cities that were anywhere near the sophistication, size and organisation of Harappan cities. The size of the cities facilitated the development of sanitation, with the Harappan sewage system being the first of its kind in the world (Service, 1975). Furthermore, the architectural style of the cities, which predominantly very uniform and with pre-set, finite limits, shows a degree of urban planning that had yet to have been achieved anywhere else in the world. It can be assumed that it was the ruling class, in conjunction with architects designed the cities, which in turn can lead to the idea that the ruling classes in each city were co-operative and met regularly to exchange ideas and to try and set up a unified government- clearly, with the cities, they had succeeded in creating a single, uniform style across the entire civilisation. Comparable cities in Mesopotamia and Egypt, for example, Memphis, were neither planned nor did they possess systems of sewage. Urbanisation on such a scale is indicative of a complex society, and the uniformity of them suggests that if there wasn’t centralized political organisation, then the ruling classes were still able to maintain consistency across the empire despite their apparent equal status and free reign to do as they pleased in their own territory of government. Service (1975) believes that the existence of cities and their highly organised nature indicates the presence of a ‘highly bureaucratized’ system of political governance, which can be contrasted with the very autocratic system of governance adopted by the Mesopotamians and the Egyptians.

The egalitarian nature of political and household life in the Indus Valley, however, did not stretch to financial affairs. Trade, wealth accumulation and taxation area also important indicators of the nature of a civilisation. The Harappan civilisation engaged in land based and maritime trade, and their trade networks were very widespread by contemporary standards. Maritime trade took Harappan artefacts as far as Egypt and even Crete, while trade with Mesopotamia has been documented via the discovery of Harappan artefacts in Mesopotamian cities (Bogucki, 1975). The existence of long distance and widespread trade is symptomatic of the presence of an elite who dominated financially through wealth accumulation, derived from trade profits. It can also be assumed that for the basic need of food, countryside Harappans’ would have had to have given up a tithe to a tradesman or perhaps a tax collector to ensure the survival of the cities. Another possibility with regards to taxation is that peasants were obliged to pay contributions of food to the ruling class and their representatives in exchange for the development of irrigation systems. There is little historiography on the tax system employed by the Harappans’ but it is almost certain that there was a system of taxation in order to feed the populations in the vast cities. As these are prerequisites for civilisation as defined by Childe (cited in Bogucki), the concept of the Harappan civilisation as a state is given further credibility.

In conclusion, there has been a long debate over the authenticity of the Harappan civilisations claim to be a state-level society. While the debate so far has produced a resounding ‘no’, it can solely be attributed to the Harappan language, which has yet to be deciphered and would reveal significant information on the nature of Harappan society, from political to cultural. Nevertheless, with what little evidence that is available to historians, it can be concluded that the Harappans’ were technological superiors to their contemporaries, had established literacy and widespread trade routes, and had designed cities meticulously. As they satisfy Childes definition of civilisation, the Harappan’s were a state-level society.

Bibliography

McNeill, J. & McNeill, W. “The Human Web”,(New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2003, pp. 1‐55.

Bogucki, P. “Early States and Chiefdoms in the Shadow of States”, The Origins of Human Society Maldan, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1999, pp. 330‐337 and 359‐363.

Posserl, G. “Sociocultural Complexity without the State”, in Feinman, G. and Marcus, J. eds., Archaic States Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 1998, pp. 261‐291.

Service, E. “The Origins of Civilization in the Indus River Valley”, Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1975), pp. 238‐246.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an ugly bastard

Trust me, i've seen worse lol. I've seen those 30 year olds who look like there over 50 who wear an umbro tracksuit with socks tucked into there trackies. Just shocking, and to top it off they're much uglier than that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You