Slobodan Rajkovic

[Kez 2,727]

so Your just a weird english who knows nothing about football at all.LOL.

try to construct your sentences so they don't make you sound like a retard.

101 things wrong with what you just said, but i will ignore all of it in the knowledge you may have just escaped from some form of correctional facility.

lmfaoooo

Edited June 17, 2010 by Kez

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Interesting.

We desided to sell Stoch but we will keep a defender who has been on loan for 3 seasons and hasn't made it to Twente's starting XI.

Strange one. However with Belletti gone and Carvalho and Ferreira set on following suit you can imagine Ancelotti wanting as many potential prospects as we have; namely van Aanholt, Bruma, Hutchinson, Rajkovic.

[Vincent 403]

Rajkovic aint potential for Chelsea at all, he aint even in the first squad of FC Twente. This season he was like third choise as substitute but thats also cause he was injured. Imo we have enough potential on left back, Cole, Zhirkov, van Aanholt - Rajkovic is useless for us.

He gets too many injuries, only plus point is he's about 20 years young and still about to learn.

Edited June 19, 2010 by Vincent

[EskWeston 696]

Rajkovic has not been able to join up with Chelsea yet due to work permit issues, also he has had a number of injuries to contend with, but is still seen as an prospect. Not too sure if he will make it or not, probably not, but the club clearly want to give him another year before anything is decided.

[TrueChelseaBlue 105]

well said Esk.

[Kostas 1,468]

So what's the deal with him now?

He was never mentioned as a loan returnee and didn't feature in the friendly game,I think it's fair to assume that it's only a matter of time before we release him.

[EskWeston 696]

So what's the deal with him now?

He was never mentioned as a loan returnee and didn't feature in the friendly game,I think it's fair to assume that it's only a matter of time before we release him.

Still problems being able to bring him to the club to play for us. I am sure (my memory isn't the greatest) that he will have to spend this season again on loan before we can bring him in, if we want to bring him in at all.

[- 25 - 167]

Just been denied a work permit for a move to Fulham.

The Mail

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Just been denied a work permit for a move to Fulham.

The Mail

They'd made a deal to sign him?! I thought he was one of ours?

[- 25 - 167]

They'd made a deal to sign him?! I thought he was one of ours?

Yeah, presumably we've accepted a bid.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Yeah, presumably we've accepted a bid.

Sorry, worded that really badly lol..

I mean, I thought he was one of our up and coming stars?

[- 25 - 167]

Sorry, worded that really badly lol..

I mean, I thought he was one of our up and coming stars?

Oh right, yeah I had high hopes for him aswell when we signed him but I think he's been pretty unimpresive on loan in Holland. Think we maybe should've brought him over to London when he was sixteen, could've aided his development.

[5354 204]

It seems like he is available for FREE.

Fulham were disappointed in their pursuit of the defender Slobodan Rajkovic, who spent three years with Chelsea on loan at PSV Eindhoven and FC Twente in Holland, and is now a free agent. Mark Hughes attended his hearing today but saw the 21-year-old's work permit application rejected, with an appeal likely to follow.

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/aug/12/chelsea-ramires-brazil-benfica-midfielder

[EskWeston 696]

Has struggled with injury, suprised to hear he was available on a free though. Work permit issues been the reason why we havn't brought him in so not sure how a deal will be agreed.

[chrismada9 1,948]

If we can't get a work permit for Rajković then I reckon he'll sign for a Dutch club or even a German club, it's obvious that he can't play in England without a permit.