DDA 10,018 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 48 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said: I saw on reddit that one of the posters was saying that Maresca is playing George to keep his value so that they can sell him in January. It’s either that or what Juan said, he is at war with the board. I actually hope it’s because he is at war … if it’s to keep T.Georges value up then this club is beyond repair until these owners fuck off for good. I hate them soo much, it’s fucking with my head daily knowing i can’t enjoy my beloved club with all this shit going on .. prime adriano, Blue Armour and bigbluewillie 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prime adriano 11 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 George has no value to keep up. League 1 standard. Boards gotta pull the trigger and hire someone actually good for once, or the club is finished until they sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,359 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 and the owners renew sport directs contracts ffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 10,018 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 2 minutes ago, Mário César said: and the owners renew sport directs contracts ffs Because they are doing exactly what the owners want.. they are executing the plan to a tee. They will only be in trouble if the players they buy don’t sell in the future. Hopefully The Arsenals and The Man Uniteds wise up and stop bailing these idiots out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,359 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 1 hour ago, DDA said: Because they are doing exactly what the owners want.. they are executing the plan to a tee. They will only be in trouble if the players they buy don’t sell in the future. Hopefully The Arsenals and The Man Uniteds wise up and stop bailing these idiots out. exactly we are so done its sad to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,558 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 10 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said: It was on Maresca, you sub off two attackers that early in the game (knowing Cole isn't anywhere near 100%), then you throw on George and Gusto when we actually had a chance to have a go at United. At this point, I'm not sure what Maresca is trying to prove by bringing on George off the bench every other game. Missing the forest for the trees by focusing on Maresca Agree with Maresca errors in this game but this he's not been tactically inept over a long period - He's been stuck with an odd selection of players and tasked with trying to make this work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,238 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 6 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said: I saw on reddit that one of the posters was saying that Maresca is playing George to keep his value so that they can sell him in January. Should have sold him in the summer, he's rubbish prime adriano 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,386 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 https://www.thechelseachronicle.com/news/wayne-rooney-suggests-54m-man-could-have-made-the-difference-for-Chelsea-in-manchester-united-loss/ Wayne Rooney disagrees with Pedro Neto sub Maresca had to take off at least one attacker so that another goalkeeper could replace Sanchez, but Rooney did not agree with the Chelsea boss‘ decision to substitute Neto after Estevao had already been sacrificed. The United legend thinks the 25-year-old would have brought creativity to this Chelsea side, even with 10 men. Speaking on Match of the Day, Rooney said: “They had no imagination on the pitch, did they? I felt that’s what was missing for Chelsea. “They had a lot of possession going side-to-side second half, but they missed that creativity, which a Cole Palmer or a Neto could bring them. So I think the change was strange, but thankfully, it helped United.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,502 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 12 hours ago, Special Juan said: And that's the tragic state of events I'm telling you now Maresca is at full war with the club by simply putting George on as striker, not using Facundo and putting square pegs in round holes, this is Maresca telling the club indirectly that they can fuck off It's clear that both the club and Maresca are in disagreement. He wanted a CB this summer after the Colwill injury. The club tells him that he can use the fantastic Badiashile and Fofana after they repair their legs at the shop. prime adriano, Laylabelle and Mário César 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHulk 2,525 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 2 hours ago, Blue Armour said: It's clear that both the club and Maresca are in disagreement. He wanted a CB this summer after the Colwill injury. The club tells him that he can use the fantastic Badiashile and Fofana after they repair their legs at the shop. And what does it say when you have 3 RBs available and you play Fofana instead. bigbluewillie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,502 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 (edited) 26 minutes ago, TheHulk said: And what does it say when you have 3 RBs available and you play Fofana instead. That Maresca doesn't have a clue about prioritizing matches, and how to setup a team for multiple fixtures. It was a dumb move to mess up the lineup against Brentford. IMO, Maresca should have easily won the game against Brentford, maybe played on the counter and soak up pressure against Bayern with a more defensive setup, to at least get a draw against the best team in the group, in an away game. Instead he threw away both games. Against Man Utd, he threw away the game with his substitutions. Edited September 21 by Blue Armour bigbluewillie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts