Chelsea Transfers

[DDA 9,924]

Liverpool are fuming at our Lavia bid 😂 they are proper triggered.

If they end up with both Caicedo and Lavia... my word what a blunder by our lot. 

[Pizy 18,852]

And there’s Fabrizio saying it’s all but done.

Well done to the board. Pissed up a wall all summer spunking money on kids that may or may not ever make it as Chelsea players while the player our manager desperately needed to get us back into Europe we fail to get him after chasing him for months.

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

Board have failed this team and Pochetinno. 
 

Lost for words. 

[Pizy 18,852]

And what’s worse is that it’s not like the club can go “we didn’t get Caicedo so we’ll go out and get  ____ who is just as good or better.” Because there are no DM’s available that are as good as he is. Anyone else we’d be buying purely on potential. 

Fucking sickening.

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

Onstein official. 
 

Unfuckingbelievable. 

[turgi 71]

Surprise surprise 

[NikkiCFC 8,285]

13 minutes ago, shrenshah said:

Dont understand why we bid for lavia yest before closing caicedo.

Noob move by our board. Now its an ego buy from liverpool.

 

I would say let liverpool overpay, caicedo is not 106m worth. Would rather we get lavia and palhinha if we want 2 more.

Maybe we bid for Lavia because we knew we were losing Caicedo. 

[Stats 7,136]

I will be fuming if Caicedo ends up at Liverpool. This should never have got to this stage. Would be more embarrassing than the Mudryk saga. Arsenal did not need him. We need Caicedo after letting so many CM go. Should never have got to this stage. Embarrassing. I will be fuming with this, especially considering his age also.

Edited August 11, 2023 by Stats

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

Just now, NikkiCFC said:

Maybe we bid for Lavia because we knew we were losing Caicedo. 

Doesn’t matter. What we offered tonight a month ago, he’d be a Chelsea player. 
 

Fucking fuming. But hey we got 83 Brazilian wonder kids to look forward to in 5 years. 

[shrenshah 186]

Dont think we can make top 5 now

[NikkiCFC 8,285]

They offering 110m. Do people really think we should go over it? 

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

Just now, NikkiCFC said:

They offering 110m. Do people really think we should go over it? 

Doesn’t matter. Again, if we bid 100m a month ago like they fucking asked he’d be a Chelsea player! 
 

We blew our most important target!

[Vesper 30,088]

1 hour ago, Duppy Conqueror said:

We were linked with Platini in the papers around '86..that was my first broke my cherry burst my bubble..think he retired instead.ha

By 1986/87, Platini was well spent.

If he had not been hurt and out for half the season in 1978/79, he would have scored 25 or more goals (as a MFer) in 11 straight seasons (the first one was Division 2).

then he turned 30 and went rapidly downhill

was out of football (as a player) 2 years later, at 31

[Vytis33 1,261]

 

[Pizy 18,852]

So in the end we WERE perfectly capable of offering £100m and we did so. But in our infinite wisdom we waited until another club entered the race and offered more. Could’ve offered the £100m weeks ago and been done with it but tried to be cute with Brighton by offering £65m, £75m, and then £80m when they were adamant about their valuation. 

In ONE DAY Liverpool we’re able to swoop in and get it done when we’ve been chasing all summer.

Will these jokers take that £100m and offer it for some other midfielder now? Someone who perhaps wasn’t available but their club cannot possible turn down £85-100m? Barella?