Chelsea Transfers

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

4 minutes ago, CucurellatheCat said:

hehehe cucu has a hell of a hair do, im talking about this plonka with the ridiculous bleach mop on his head, at least palmers you can call "the monk" cut haha

i mean look at this hairrrrr

 

Its not as bad as palmers or cucus 😂

[CucurellatheCat 10]

Dont take the mickey yeah??! The boys come good lol...

 

[CucurellatheCat 10]

1 minute ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Its not as bad as palmers or cucus 😂

woahh woahh many women would die for the mans luscious lockzzz

😛

[CucurellatheCat 10]

23 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Weird commenting on hair when your favorite player is Cucu 😆

Only because I cant pick Terry, Zola, Cech, kante, drogz, lampz, Ashley Cole, Kante or Costa etc lol

Hes made the biggest improvement in the squad from where he was!

[NikkiCFC 8,289]

When everyone is fit and assuming we sign Simons I don't see Garnacho place in 20 players game squad 11 on the pitch and 9 on the bench. 

[CucurellatheCat 10]

1 minute ago, NikkiCFC said:

When everyone is fit and assuming we sign Simons I don't see Garnacho place in 20 players game squad 11 on the pitch and 9 on the bench. 

What i think too, who do we have for LW with noni gone?

Pedro can play across, Gittens?! I guess we do need another LW 

[CucurellatheCat 10]

 

[Special Juan 28,117]

Jackson is in demand, no doubt about it.

 

[Pizy 18,861]

5 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

Jackson is in demand, no doubt about it.

 

If only it was 3-4 PL clubs battling it out for him instead of these cheap ass Italians and Germans! 🤣

Then we may actually get the £70m+. Milan may offer us a loan with option to buy for €20m or some insulting bullshit knowing them.

[Special Juan 28,117]

We just need rid and we can easily get 50-60M for him, this is a good amount.

We get rid of Jackson and we are starting to total some serious outgoing figures, yet bringing in better players and players who want to be here

[OhForAGreavsie 6,059]

3 hours ago, CucurellatheCat said:

They can afford £75M for tesko and are desperate PLUS will sell Isak for a boat load

£75m or keep unhappy Isak i say!

 

They keep Isaak and we keep Jackson, or sell him elsewhere, is a good outcome for us. Isaak at Newcastle is dangerous, but not as dangerous as he would be at Liverpool.

[CucurellatheCat 10]

Just now, OhForAGreavsie said:

They keep Isaak and we keep Jackson, or sell him elsewhere, is a good outcome for us. Isaak at Newcastle is dangerous, but not as dangerous as he would be at Liverpool.

Agreed there mate but I dont think Liverpool are not going for him although I have just seen on twatter that Wissa is another option if they dont get Isak 

[NikkiCFC 8,289]

7 hours ago, Pizy said:

If this club signs Garnacho first and then decides not to push through Xavi…

 

'Calma'

~ Fabrizio Romano

[TheHulk 2,409]

[Special Juan 28,117]

Isak is going to Liverpool, he has dug his heels in now and when you do that at a club with fans as passionate as Newcastle they will not allow you to come back and walk with a swagger, they are the most passionate fans in the country. Newcastle keeping Isak, an unhappy Isak is detriment to everything they know and do, the Nunez money is about to land, plus the Diaz money and very soon the Harvey Elliot money, Liverpool will get Isak because what he wants suits all parties, he cannot stay at Newcastle he's cancerous and chucked it.

Newcastle can get Jackson and Wissa for under the Isak money, they aren't daft, and the money for Isak will be 140M all in