Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Breaking News: PSG are attacking for John Duran!

PSG are moving forward with the transfer even if it isn't so simple.

[@FabriceHawkins]

 

Aston Villa want atleast €85m for Jhon Durán as per @PSierraR

 

what Kavrat and Duran to Psg😐 Barcola for Chelsea pls🙌

Edited by mkh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Vesper said:

fuck, if true

https://thedailybriefing.io/i/154489566/barcelona

  • Juventus want to tie up a deal for Ronald Araujo deal, and more contact is planned with Barcelona to speed up negotiations.

Hasn’t he been super injury prone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Hasn’t he been super injury prone?

this year yes, but IF he ends up going for only 35, 40m quid or so, and IF he stays healthy the rest of this year, I would not be adverse to a gamble, as when he is healthy he is a monster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, mkh said:

BREAKING: Juventus interested in Disasi. 

Chelsea have opened up the possibility of a loan + obligation linked to number of times he plays. (@DiMarzio)

That would be the best news of the whole transfer window!    I doubt Juventus take him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BREAKING: PSG have found a verbal agreement with Napoli for Khvicha Kvaratskhelia. Deal could be concluded next week.

(via@MatteMoretto)

BREAKING — Antonio Conte confirms: “Kvaratskhelia has asked to leave the club”.

“I spoke to Khvicha and he confirmed his plan to leave the club immediately”.

(via@FabrizioRomano)

😵‍💫😵‍💫

Edited by mkh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/01/2025 at 18:29, LAM09 said:

We couldn't get a deal done for Osimhen but some believe there's a chance we'll sign Kvaratskhelia. It ain't happening.

Because we wanted a fair deal. We could have got him if we paid the asking price but walking away is much smarter than paying 80+ million when there was no competition for him.

Where the club fucked up is by focusing on Osimhen, we missed out on adding a forward

If the club is serious about a target, we've seen they're willing to go get things done - Enzo, Caicedo, Cucu, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Strike said:

Because we wanted a fair deal. We could have got him if we paid the asking price but walking away is much smarter than paying 80+ million when there was no competition for him.

Where the club fucked up is by focusing on Osimhen, we missed out on adding a forward

If the club is serious about a target, we've seen they're willing to go get things done - Enzo, Caicedo, Cucu, 

Fair deal? He was on high wages, which the club wasn't willing to meet or get relatively close to. If there was any real interest in KK, we'd face the same issues. We're not like Real Madrid, where players will gladly come even if it means taking a wage reduction.

Two of the names given were signed using the loophole. Last I checked, it was a thing of the past, so I wouldn't expect a £100 million signing in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said:

That would be the best news of the whole transfer window!    I doubt Juventus take him...

They will make it a 10 minimum appearances obligation to buy and after seeing he sucks big time after 3 matches he never plays another game, come back in June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LAM09 said:

Fair deal? He was on high wages, which the club wasn't willing to meet or get relatively close to. If there was any real interest in KK, we'd face the same issues. We're not like Real Madrid, where players will gladly come even if it means taking a wage reduction.

Two of the names given were signed using the loophole. Last I checked, it was a thing of the past, so I wouldn't expect a £100 million signing in the near future.

Yep, I'd argue it was fair given there was zero competition for him in the summer + club is not in the Champions League right now. 

It was Chelsea or bust for Osimhen and his stock has gone further down now since the summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strike said:

Yep, I'd argue it was fair given there was zero competition for him in the summer + club is not in the Champions League right now. 

It was Chelsea or bust for Osimhen and his stock has gone further down now since the summer. 

Lack of competition doesn't mean player is of less value or should be seen that way. He parted ways with agent shortly after and sealed his move to Gala himself (if reports are to believed). 

Either way, he'll see at the end of the season if going with just NJ for another season was smart or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LAM09 said:

Lack of competition doesn't mean player is of less value or should be seen that way. He parted ways with agent shortly after and sealed his move to Gala himself (if reports are to believed). 

Either way, he'll see at the end of the season if going with just NJ for another season was smart or not.

I would argue he is. For reasonable money, I'd take him but not break the bank for him. He is not in the tier of players that you would pay over the odds to get

Many teams wanted a striker in the summer - ManU, Arsenal, PSG and didn't go for him - other than the Saudi bids. Would be surprised if a big club goes for him for the main striker role. 

Edited by Strike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...