Christian Pulisic

[Vesper 30,119]

13 minutes ago, Scooter said:

Oh come on, show some balls

I will need to check my handbag to see if I have a spare set

[Tomo 21,751]

51 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

Pathetic describes ESPN perfectly.

Shaka Hislop seems allright, he should look at jumping ship, I would say to a quality broadcast but less shit would be more appropriate.

[Jase 43,479]

13 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Shaka Hislop seems allright, he should look at jumping ship, I would say to a quality broadcast but less shit would be more appropriate.

Meh. ESPN's regular pundits are horrible. Only their guest pundits - e.g. Gab Marcotti, Sid Lowe - are okay to listen to. 

[Tomo 21,751]

8 minutes ago, Jason said:

Meh. ESPN's regular pundits are horrible. Only their guest pundits - e.g. Gab Marcotti, Sid Lowe - are okay to listen to. 

I can't say I watch the channel reguarly for obvious reasons so maybe I'm wrong but he's always seems quite decent for me (especially by the standards set by his colleagues) and I remember an interview he did with Cech around the time we won the CL which I thought was very good although probably helped both being keepers.

[Jase 43,479]

4 minutes ago, Tomo said:

I can't say I watch the channel reguarly for obvious reasons so maybe I'm wrong but he's always seems quite decent for me (especially by the standards set by his colleagues) and I remember an interview he did with Cech around the time we won the CL which I thought was very good although probably helped both being keepers.

He only seemed decent because he doesn't scream or talk loudly like some of his colleagues do. 

[Henrique 9,133]

If only Pulisic was born in UK...he would be playing gamer after game under Lampard.

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,920]

1 minute ago, Henrique said:

If only Pulisic was born in UK Better than Willian...he would be playing gamer after game under Lampard.

Fixed that for you

[The Skipper 20,609]

On 27/09/2019 at 8:39 PM, Tomo said:

In layman's terms what we saw against Liverpool in Istanbul and Salzburg in pre season consistently. I thought he was a joy to watch in those games.

Problem is it looks like we're only getting that version one game in ten.

So basically Willian 2.0? 

[Magic Lamps 11,692]

As much as I hate Willian and like Pulisic as a player, i can not belive how may people are demanding starts for Pulisic. Have a little patience. Other than the super cup Puli has been absolute shite. 

Always doing the same thing, sprinting down the line, scoffing his shot or falling over. Producing turnover after turnover. Leaving Azpi exposed. Willians introduction has stabilized us and improved the transition with his ability to carry the ball. Also he is positionally disciplined.

No one noticed Azpis drastic improvement in form? Willian has helped him out a lot and we are not conceding goals from.the right almost every game unlike when Pulisic started. 

To my absolute disgust  replacing Pulisic with Willian has been a clever short term fix to two of our most obvious problems in the opening games. 

I understand people want to see more of Puli, he is young, great pace, American, 60m signing etc and his time will come. But right now he is not what we need.

[Tomo 21,751]

2 hours ago, The Skipper said:

So basically Willian 2.0? 

The ideal is that he eventually turns more consistent performances as he grows into his prime alas out doing Willian. He certainly has the raw tools along with a decent attitude and I remember how hot and cold Mane and Sterling use to look and now look at them.

[manpe 10,861]

6 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

As much as I hate Willian and like Pulisic as a player, i can not belive how may people are demanding starts for Pulisic. Have a little patience. Other than the super cup Puli has been absolute shite. 

Always doing the same thing, sprinting down the line, scoffing his shot or falling over. Producing turnover after turnover. Leaving Azpi exposed. Willians introduction has stabilized us and improved the transition with his ability to carry the ball. Also he is positionally disciplined.

No one noticed Azpis drastic improvement in form? Willian has helped him out a lot and we are not conceding goals from.the right almost every game unlike when Pulisic started. 

To my absolute disgust  replacing Pulisic with Willian has been a clever short term fix to two of our most obvious problems in the opening games. 

I understand people want to see more of Puli, he is young, great pace, American, 60m signing etc and his time will come. But right now he is not what we need.

Totally agree. As is to my disgust, but Willian is just better for the team atm.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

7 hours ago, The Skipper said:

So basically Willian 2.0? 

Willian wont last forever so the board had to find someone else to frustrate the fans.

[SUNZ 155]

I just want to know why Pulisic was bought in the first place. He didn't have a great season(s), his goals & assists record is lacklustre and he certainly wasn't worth the amount Dortmund were asking for.

Everything about this transfer stinks.

[manpe 10,861]

7 minutes ago, SUNZ said:

I just want to know why Pulisic was bought in the first place.

It isn't difficult to understand. He's American and got some ability.

[NikkiCFC 8,300]

20 minutes ago, SUNZ said:

his goals & assists record is lacklustre 

7 goals and 6 assists in 1700 minutes (equal half PL season ) last season was very solid.