Polo7 3,496 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 We never had an agreement with Swansea. Ox wanted to play as a midfielder and he rejected us knowing he wouldn't be a starter in that position here. Barkley probably felt the same, that he would only come here to be a squad player at best. If anything this is flattery. Those players think so highly of us that they swallow their pride and realize they're not good enough for us then turn to other teams (Liverpool,Tottenham). Over the years and probably for more to come, we attracted top players. Even in this window someone like Sandro was willing to come here and leave a champions league finalist. The truth is, we lost transfer targets because of our unwillingness to pay the demanded fees. We would rather negotiate and waste time until eventually another team comes and splashes the cash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's too big 625 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Stop listening to the media. If you didn't realise the media talk out of their asses by now, you never will. Sunday Supplement are some of the worst. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 40 minutes ago, Polo7 said: http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on. The media's anti-Chelsea agenda at its best. They have been constantly focusing on the players that supposedly rejected us in the transfer window and conveniently not mentioned any of the players that chose us over others (e.g. Bakayoko). Hell, we even attracted a multiple time La Liga, Champions League and Serie A winner but guess that doesn't fit into their agenda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alabama 1,992 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 I blame our board for this trash English media is evangelizing....our main target for rwb role Danilo...we lost out because we refused to pay the transfer fee we rather want to negotiate the fee till City came onboard and pay the fee....Ox and Barkley are average English players at best though they have great qualities that could see them become good players in the future...Had it been we pay the transfer fee for danilo we wont be interested in Ox while barkley could see the handwriting far fro afar off that he wont be a member of the starting XI cos there are far more better players in his preferred position.. Llorente m not even a fan of his... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iggy Doonican 4,186 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Didn't see much evidence of that a couple of weeks ago despite having 70,000 fans in the ground compared to our 3,000. A team that's won fuck all in the past 25 years apart from a couple of league cups. Shit fans, shit club, shit area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 03/09/2017 at 11:55 AM, Polo7 said: http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on. Spurs are more attractive than Chelsea 😂😂 that's just like saying Susan Boyle is more attractive than Megan Fox the media are clueless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceflix 207 Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 Hahahah yeah based on their imagination! Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 They all hate us... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 28 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said: They all hate us... ...'cause they ain't us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,077 Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 On 03/09/2017 at 0:22 PM, Rapkun said: We never had an agreement with Swansea. Ox wanted to play as a midfielder and he rejected us knowing he wouldn't be a starter in that position here. Barkley probably felt the same, that he would only come here to be a squad player at best. If anything this is flattery. Those players think so highly of us that they swallow their pride and realize they're not good enough for us then turn to other teams (Liverpool,Tottenham). Over the years and probably for more to come, we attracted top players. Even in this window someone like Sandro was willing to come here and leave a champions league finalist. The truth is, we lost transfer targets because of our unwillingness to pay the demanded fees. We would rather negotiate and waste time until eventually another team comes and splashes the cash. All lies and jest Stil, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 On 9/3/2017 at 6:55 PM, Polo7 said: http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on. Maybe for the british player, It looks like they want to play with their friends or something like that. Ox want to play for pool and Barkley want to play for spurs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Well a lot of players turning us down, and it's thanks to the brilliant work of the board! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Kaplan- 410 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 On 11/5/2017 at 8:24 AM, Fernando said: Well a lot of players turning us down, and it's thanks to the brilliant work of the board! Yes, but Spurs aren't even in for most of these players. As for Llorente, if he had come, would Bats have hit a growth spurt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.