Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Spurs more attractive.....

Polo7

By Polo7,
in Matthew Harding Stand

 Share

Recommended Posts

Polo7

Polo7 3,496

Posted
Posted

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea

So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. 

The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. 

Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Rapkun

Rapkun 668

Posted
Posted

We never had an agreement with Swansea. Ox wanted to play as a midfielder and he rejected us knowing he wouldn't be a starter in that position here. Barkley probably felt the same, that he would only come here to be a squad player at best. If anything this is flattery. Those players think so highly of us that they swallow their pride and realize they're not good enough for us then turn to other teams (Liverpool,Tottenham).

Over the years and probably for more to come, we attracted top players. Even in this window someone like Sandro was willing to come here and leave a champions league finalist.

The truth is, we lost transfer targets because of our unwillingness to pay the demanded fees. We would rather negotiate and waste time until eventually another team comes and splashes the cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jase

Jase 43,479

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Polo7 said:

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea

So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. 

The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. 

Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on.

The media's anti-Chelsea agenda at its best. They have been constantly focusing on the players that supposedly rejected us in the transfer window and conveniently not mentioned any of the players that chose us over others (e.g. Bakayoko). Hell, we even attracted a multiple time La Liga, Champions League and Serie A winner but guess that doesn't fit into their agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alabama

Alabama 1,992

Posted
Posted

I blame our board for this trash English media is evangelizing....our main target for rwb role Danilo...we lost out because we refused to pay the transfer fee we rather want to negotiate the fee till City came onboard and pay the fee....Ox and Barkley are average English players at best though they have great qualities that could see them become good players in the future...Had it been we pay the transfer fee for danilo we wont be interested in Ox while barkley could see the handwriting far fro afar off that he wont be a member of the starting XI cos there are far more better players in his preferred position.. Llorente m not even a fan of his...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Iggy Doonican

Iggy Doonican 4,186

Posted
Posted

Didn't see much evidence of that a couple of weeks ago despite having 70,000 fans in the ground compared to our 3,000. A team that's won fuck all in the past 25 years apart from a couple of league cups. Shit fans, shit club, shit area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the wes

the wes 7,212

Posted
Posted
On 03/09/2017 at 11:55 AM, Polo7 said:

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea

So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. 

The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. 

Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on.

Spurs are more attractive than Chelsea 😂😂 that's just like saying Susan Boyle is more attractive than Megan Fox the media are clueless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
OhForAGreavsie

OhForAGreavsie 5,892

Posted
Posted
On 03/09/2017 at 0:22 PM, Rapkun said:

We never had an agreement with Swansea. Ox wanted to play as a midfielder and he rejected us knowing he wouldn't be a starter in that position here. Barkley probably felt the same, that he would only come here to be a squad player at best. If anything this is flattery. Those players think so highly of us that they swallow their pride and realize they're not good enough for us then turn to other teams (Liverpool,Tottenham).

Over the years and probably for more to come, we attracted top players. Even in this window someone like Sandro was willing to come here and leave a champions league finalist.

The truth is, we lost transfer targets because of our unwillingness to pay the demanded fees. We would rather negotiate and waste time until eventually another team comes and splashes the cash.

All lies and jest

Stil, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
communicate

communicate 2,703

Posted
Posted
On 9/3/2017 at 6:55 PM, Polo7 said:

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/tv-shows/sunday-supplement/11018731/spurs-more-appealing-than-chelsea

So apparently because some mediocre players didnt want to join us, we have become less attractive than Spurs. 

The English media is full of idiots, literally idiots. We didnt bid for Llorente. Plus we rarely give anyone over 30 more than a year contract. 

Any player who chooses Spurs over Chelsea, clearly has a screw lose. We are better than them at everything except putting pressure on.

Maybe for the british player, It looks like they want to play with their friends or something like that.

Ox want to play for pool and Barkley want to play for spurs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
-Kaplan-

-Kaplan- 410

Posted
Posted
On 11/5/2017 at 8:24 AM, Fernando said:

Well a lot of players turning us down, and it's thanks to the brilliant work of the board! 

Yes, but Spurs aren't even in for most of these players.  

As for Llorente, if he had come, would Bats have hit a growth spurt? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter