Jamie Vardy

[the wes 7,212]

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/639169/Chelsea-Jamie-Vardy-move-considered-summer-Leicester-striker-Transfer-News-Gossip-News

I wouldn't mind signing Vardy but I doubt Leicester would sell him 

[yuvala 2,167]

Not happening.. just spent 70M on a striker and we have far more important signings to make.

Plus they wont let him go.

[termninja 5,290]

If we plan to play with 2 strikers, we certainly need a 3 strikers. If he is available for a decent fee then he's certainly among the best we can bring but I can't see this transfer happening. Does anyone know how much years Vardy has on his contract?

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

If he come, think Michy will be out

[Pizy 18,368]

He'd be the perfect Plan B striker but he's the one player who is irreplaceable for Leicester. There's no chance they sell him at this point in the window.

[lucio 5,418]

he's 30... and i bet would cost 45m+, go for belotti

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

Mirror Football‏Verified account @MirrorFootball 

Chelsea considering shock move for Leicester striker Jamie Vardy as Diego Costa exile continues http://bit.ly/2xo8WV9 

[gadget 126]

Wouldn't mind this one. we haven't got a striker that harasses defender i.e a Tevez type menace. Vardy would be decent for a couple of years although other positions should be a priority 

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

I love Michy as a guy, and think he has immense potential, Vardy has more about him right now, without a shadow of a doubt,  not even a debatable point.

 

Vardy's age is what puts me off, 30m ish for a 29 yr old.  

[akgw13 867]

I have no interest in Vardy. He is a fine player, a hard worker, willing runner, pretty good finisher. But for the price they will want and his age? no thank you. 

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

2 hours ago, ChelseaFanUK said:

I love Michy as a guy, and think he has immense potential, Vardy has more about him right now, without a shadow of a doubt,  not even a debatable point.

 

Vardy's age is what puts me off, 30m ish for a 29 yr old.  

He's 30, going into 31 in 5 months. 

But it wouldn't put me off. We need another striker and I don't see any great options. Vardy for 2 years, why not ? Unless we're relying on Morata and Michy for a whole season which is ridiculous. Vardy and Morata in a duo? It could work. Against any good side we're always playing on a counter anyway so let's sign someone who's pretty good at this. Vardy is actually elite playing on a counter. We won't change, we'll be approaching any big game with that underdog mentality. For me it makes a lot of sense.

 

 

[akgw13 867]

3 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

He's 30, going into 31 in 5 months. 

But it wouldn't put me off. We need another striker and I don't see any great options. Vardy for 2 years, why not ? Unless we're relying on Morata and Michy for a whole season which is ridiculous. Vardy and Morata in a duo? It could work. Against any good side we're always playing on a counter anyway so let's sign someone who's pretty good at this. Vardy is actually elite playing on a counter. We won't change, we'll be approaching any big game with that underdog mentality. For me it makes a lot of sense.

 

 

My issue isnt with his skill set, its the price for his age. What do you think they will demand for him if they want 40m for Drinkwater?

[Sideshow Luiz 2,310]

 

 

[YorkshireBlue 3,122]

This is last time I look at this thread lol

[Special Juan 27,424]

'My sources' 'Sources close to me' in other words please click subscribe

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

55 minutes ago, akgw13 said:

My issue isnt with his skill set, its the price for his age. What do you think they will demand for him if they want 40m for Drinkwater?

What's the issue with the price? Chelsea don't make an offer based on that they saved money on this player or that player. It's completely irrelevant for their evaluation. I give you example. If Chelsea value Vardy at 30m£ and sign him for 20m£ and then go for Van Dijk who they value at 50m£ they won't pay 60m£ because they saved 10m£ on others. It's been a case for years that Chelsea make their own evaluation of a player. So really don't bother with the money. 

[akgw13 867]

34 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

What's the issue with the price? Chelsea don't make an offer based on that they saved money on this player or that player. It's completely irrelevant for their evaluation. I give you example. If Chelsea value Vardy at 30m£ and sign him for 20m£ and then go for Van Dijk who they value at 50m£ they won't pay 60m£ because they saved 10m£ on others. It's been a case for years that Chelsea make their own evaluation of a player. So really don't bother with the money. 

I understand that, but price paid is still an important figure especially when the player is an ageing striker reliant on pace. if its 30m or under im fine. 30-35 meh. 35 and over i don't like the deal. Budget matters and using more than we need to on an ageing player is not something i am interested in personally.