BMox81 193 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/chelsea-target-alex-sandro-52-million-transfer-bid-offered-new-juventus-deal-a3567856.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artandur 939 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 1 hour ago, Dingus said: https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/chelsea-target-alex-sandro-52-million-transfer-bid-offered-new-juventus-deal-a3567856.html so i guess now we'll see if this whole thing was a ploy to get a better contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 6 minutes ago, Artandur said: so i guess now we'll see if this whole thing was a ploy to get a better contract I don't think so, if we offer 150.000 £ we will get him. He wants reportedly to join us . So we will wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Per few sources there are big problems for Juventus in their defense. At the half time against Real Madrid Bonucci wanted from Allegri to bring Cuadrado for Barzalgi because he "played" very poor in the first half and apparently Barzalgi didn't forgot that from Bonucci. After that Dani Alves said that Dybala should leave Juve to be even better player, so now he is very close to join Man City for 5-6M€, and for Chelsea fans Alex Sandro could be on his way out and in that case Juve will try to get the best offer they can from Chelsea, he will be replaced with Guerrero from BVB. Bonucci after those incidents is also on his way out more than ever. Juve still have Rugani, Chiellini, Barzagli and Benatia for CB spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 2 hours ago, Special Juan said: I think labeling the board with lack of ambition is silenced by the fact it seems we are pushing hard to get this guy for 60M The problem isn't the board bidding. The problem is can the Chelsea Fc board close a deal that is more than £35mil ?? The stones, Koulibaly and other sagas say otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 We can't blame the board that they can't close a deal more than 35millions . We had offered 90m for pogba before he chooses united. We offered 70,60 millions to stones ,koylibaly ,lukaku,Alex Sandro. My opinion is, don't blame the board but the other clubs who they don't accept these offers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,926 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Knowing our board, if we fail to sign Sandro, rather than going after the next best target we'll wait until the deadline and panic buy someone not nearly as good. If we can't get him we need to throw that money at Mendy, Walker, Semedo. Someone top class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tautvix 1,321 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 23 minutes ago, Dimitr said: We can't blame the board that they can't close a deal more than 35millions . We had offered 90m for pogba before he chooses united. We offered 70,60 millions to stones ,koylibaly ,lukaku,Alex Sandro. My opinion is, don't blame the board but the other clubs who they don't accept these offers. Of course we can blame our board for not being able to close the deals. The point is we can't get some players and then other clubs just go and buy them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 10 minutes ago, Tautvix said: Of course we can blame our board for not being able to close the deals. The point is we can't get some players and then other clubs just go and buy him. The problem is we aren't a marque club. We aren't be an attractive club like a few years ago ( mourinho's era).This is the problem . For this reason we lost Tolisso etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 9 minutes ago, Dimitr said: The problem is we aren't a marque club. We aren't be an attractive club like a few years ago ( mourinho's era).This is the problem . For this reason we lost Tolisso etc. Were we actually interested in Tolisso or are people just using rumours based off 1-2 sources to criticize the club? For all we know, Tolisso's agent or Lyon could have used our name to get as much money as possible from Bayern Munich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 3 hours ago, Special Juan said: I think labeling the board with lack of ambition is silenced by the fact it seems we are pushing hard to get this guy for 60M Nope. Any club can bid for players, leak it to the press, then play the fiscal responsibility card to justify why the deal didn't go through. And if you read today's reports, Alex Sandro is being offered a new deal. So you can add Sandro to the ever growing list of players the Chelsea Board "Tried" to sign, but failed to do so. That's not good enough. Being economically frugal summer after summer after summer, is not how a "supposedly" big club conducts business, especially not for a club that has sold players for the fees we have the past 2 years. Settling for 4th/5th tier options again and again, then expecting the manager to pull a miracle with sub-par players is not a recipre for sustained success. So yeah, Marina doesn't know how to pull off ambitious transfers. All they do is fuck around with their bids until the selling club gets fed up, and Chelsea are left scrambling for 4th/5th player options. The past two summers show this undisputedly. And if Chelsea fail to sign theclikes Alex Sandro/Sanchez/J. Rodriguez/VVD/Koulibaly/ whomever else, then those players will all be added to the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tautvix 1,321 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 20 minutes ago, Dimitr said: The problem is we aren't a marque club. We aren't be an attractive club like a few years ago ( mourinho's era).This is the problem . For this reason we lost Tolisso etc. Yes we can hardly compete with Man Utd, Real and Barca. With others like Bayern, Juve or Man City we can compete all day long. Remember how we managed to buy Hazard when Man Utd and Man City were also competing for him? SAF was still Man Utd manager and they were far more attractive than Chelsea. But we paid more to Hazard's agent than anyone else. That's what makes you attractive club these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tautvix 1,321 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Blue-in-me-Veins said: Nope. Any club can bid for players, leak it to the press, then play the fiscal responsibility card to justify why the deal didn't go through. And if you read today's reports, Alex Sandro is being offered a new deal. So you can add Sandro to the ever growing list of players the Chelsea Board "Tried" to sign, but failed to do so. That's not good enough. Being economically frugal summer after summer after summer, is not how a "supposedly" big club conducts business, especially not for a club that has sold players for the fees we have the past 2 years. Settling for 4th/5th tier options again and again, then expecting the manager to pull a miracle with sub-par players is not a recipre for sustained success. So yeah, Marina doesn't know how to pull off ambitious transfers. All they do is fuck around with their bids until the selling club gets fed up, and Chelsea are left scrambling for 4th/5th player options. The past two summers show this undisputedly. And if Chelsea fail to sign theclikes Alex Sandro/Sanchez/J. Rodriguez/VVD/Koulibaly/ whomever else, then those players will all be added to the list. I agree. That's only Wenger's excuse. He almost signed everyone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 1 hour ago, Tautvix said: I agree. That's only Wenger's excuse. He almost signed everyone... Yep yep. It's simply gross incompetance from the Chelsea heirarchy that are involved in the recruitment of players for the 1st team. I swear, Ousmane Dembele or a Kylian Mbappe could make it be known to CFC that they would favor them over any other club, and Marina/Emenalo would bottle that transfer 100% by trying to get cute and penny-pinch, then piss off all parties involved like with the Stones Saga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaFanUK 1,014 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 think we might get Sandro. Marotta was leaving the door open for his move the other day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgiannutt 3,201 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 2 hours ago, Blue-in-me-Veins said: Nope. Any club can bid for players, leak it to the press, then play the fiscal responsibility card to justify why the deal didn't go through. And if you read today's reports, Alex Sandro is being offered a new deal. So you can add Sandro to the ever growing list of players the Chelsea Board "Tried" to sign, but failed to do so. That's not good enough. Being economically frugal summer after summer after summer, is not how a "supposedly" big club conducts business, especially not for a club that has sold players for the fees we have the past 2 years. Settling for 4th/5th tier options again and again, then expecting the manager to pull a miracle with sub-par players is not a recipre for sustained success. So yeah, Marina doesn't know how to pull off ambitious transfers. All they do is fuck around with their bids until the selling club gets fed up, and Chelsea are left scrambling for 4th/5th player options. The past two summers show this undisputedly. And if Chelsea fail to sign theclikes Alex Sandro/Sanchez/J. Rodriguez/VVD/Koulibaly/ whomever else, then those players will all be added to the list. Ever stopped to think that maybe we're penny pinching for a reason ? Like say because we don't have a blanc cheque anymore from Abramovich to do what we want. It's pretty obvious these last couple of years he hasn't been injecting loads of money into the club anymore (apart from the 500 mill stadium ofcourse ). We're working with a different budget (the money that the club actuammy has and not Roman Abramovich his money) then before so we need to be more careful how we spend our money. This transferwindow we have a significant warchest with the raised tv money and the players we've sold but the players we're after will be expensive in this market and we need around 4-6 players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akgw13 867 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 If the club manage to secure Sandro/Bakayoko/Caballero that is an amazing start to the summer. Lukaku deal will get done, if not we will turn our attention to Belotti and i would be over the moon if that happens, either way Conte is going to get his striker. A summer window of those 4 is a massive success to me and any other players would be cherry on top. I refuse to get excited about Sandro until we announce though, he is a spectacular player. Hazard/Sandro link up is terrifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccg 1,528 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Alex Sandro Loan deals do count Chelsea 6/4 Manchester City 25/1 To Stay at Juventus (Does not include returning on loan following a permanent deal elsewhere) 1/2 This might happen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireBlue 3,277 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 4 hours ago, Dimitr said: The problem is we aren't a marque club. We aren't be an attractive club like a few years ago ( mourinho's era).This is the problem . For this reason we lost Tolisso etc. We didn't lose tolisso we enquired about him like once ppl are making out he was are main target he wasn't bakayoko has and always will be contes target please stop blaming the board and are club for a player we was never interested in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 19 minutes ago, BluesMadLad said: We didn't lose tolisso we enquired about him like once ppl are making out he was are main target he wasn't bakayoko has and always will be contes target please stop blaming the board and are club for a player we was never interested in I've heard that we also offered 35m € and he chose Bayern.I don't know the reliability of this source,but nobody can prove it wrong or right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts