Jump to content

Victor Lindelof


 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

But he doesn't even have 20 appearances in the only decent league he's been tested in. Where is the 'good prospect' talk from? Did he have a good game for Sweden?

We need experience. Zouma is our prospect. Christensen is our prospect. Any more prospects instead of final products and we're just not going to get a league title again for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Thendo said:

Cb, but he played rb most of the euros and did well. I think he can play dm aswell if I recall correctly. 

your rite mate Lindelof is a versatile defender and can play centrally, as a right-back or holding midfielder I  like having versatile players in your squad they are useful players to have 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, the wes said:

your rite mate Lindelof is a versatile defender and can play centrally, as a right-back or holding midfielder I  like having versatile players in your squad they are useful players to have 

True, as along as we get another top CB in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RuudiGullit said:

Meanwhile while Emenalo is dealing with this kid, Everton are almost done signing up a better defender: Koulibaly. 

It's been what? Four days since the best midfielder of the last 12 months in England was signed and already you're bored and want a new toy :doh:

Oh, an if you genuinely believe Emenalo is in charge of transfer negotiations you need a long lie down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When was the last time there was a Swede at Chelsea? We've had Icelandics, Finns and Danes in the past (and present) but I can't recall anyone from the IKEA land.

 

To be honest, I have never heard of him. Even if he is a top prospect, I'll be slightly disappointed if this our supposed top defensive signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RuudiGullit said:

Offering 75 million for Morata but Koulibaly is too expensive. 

Now we get this guy. What a crock of shite. 

We don't need him FFS. 

koulibaly is not a top player and we can't pay lot of milions for him..imho..ranocchia is the right name..conte knows him and he is pratically free..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, !Hazard! said:

When was the last time there was a Swede at Chelsea? We've had Icelandics, Finns and Danes in the past (and present) but I can't recall anyone from the IKEA land.

 

To be honest, I have never heard of him. Even if he is a top prospect, I'll be slightly disappointed if this our supposed top defensive signing.

We signed Hedman on a free the same year Cech got injured.  Never played a game though, similar to Amelia last season. 

Would be fun to have another Swede at the bridge,  but Im not so sure that he would be a starter for us.  Rather we kept Christensen if we're signing him for his potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Antonio8 said:

koulibaly is not a top player and we can't pay lot of milions for him..imho..ranocchia is the right name..conte knows him and he is pratically free..

Um, Koulibaly is one of the best CBs in Serie A. He's an absolute monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Antonio8 said:

koulibaly is not a top player and we can't pay lot of milions for him..imho..ranocchia is the right name..conte knows him and he is pratically free..

I'd take Nocchi too. Like a lot of Italian defenders, he's going to be a late bloomer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...