Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Pedro Rodríguez

Pacquiao

By Pacquiao,
in Midfielders

 Share

Recommended Posts

manpe

manpe 10,861

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mccg said:

Chelsea set to sign explosive winger with 7 goals in 16 games as Conte expands attacking options

http://www.chelsea-news.co/2017/07/chelsea-set-sign-explosive-winger-7-goals-16-games-conte-expands-attacking-options/

What does this have to do with anything? We are not talking about Vitesse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HRiver
HRiver
Styles
Styles

Even more apparent in a team like ours.

Special Juan
Special Juan

I said before all this kicked off again that the club needed shagging with a hot scaffold pole if we didn't go for him, we did and we fucking nailed it. I will put good money that this lad flourishes

Posted Images

mccg

mccg 1,528

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, manpe said:

What does this have to do with anything? We are not talking about Vitesse.

Cfc looking for a winger dosn't say anything about Vitesse if you could even be bothered to read the article !:fainthv9:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mccg

mccg 1,528

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Sideshow Luiz said:

He just means that it's another one for the loan army and will probably be off to Vitesse if we sign him.

Kinda knew that, but the post was just a follow on with the Pedro injury and the fact we are short in the position,the article said nothing that he would be going to Vitesse if we did sign him, there is no indication that he would go there , i wouldn't say it is a probable as we need another winger nxt season not afew years down the line. IF we do buy him without any other wingers think he will be into the squad ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sideshow Luiz

Sideshow Luiz 2,310

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, mccg said:

Kinda knew that, but the post was just a follow on with the Pedro injury and the fact we are short in the position,the article said nothing that he would be going to Vitesse if we did sign him, there is no indication that he would go there , i wouldn't say it is a probable as we need another winger nxt season not afew years down the line. IF we do buy him without any other wingers think he will be into the squad ?

Doubt it.  At another club?  Probably.  Here?  Not really.  We have Boga and Musonda as well.  Depends how he gets on in training, I suppose.  I just don't remember the last time we bought an "unknown" and he didn't go on loan (or was dumped 12 months later).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Magic Lamps

Magic Lamps 11,653

Posted
Posted

Really disappointed with him in the CS. Paassenger in the game and an absolutely needless tackle that gave that con-ref a choice. I think it is safe to say he lost us that "trophy" and more importantly that we lost to one of our biggest rivals in a really embarrassing fashion. After the season he has had he should have done better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
termninja

termninja 5,290

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

Really disappointed with him in the CS. Paassenger in the game and an absolutely needless tackle that gave that con-ref a choice. I think it is safe to say he lost us that "trophy" and more importantly that we lost to one of our biggest rivals in a really embarrassing fashion. After the season he has had he should have done better. 

I got no problem with his attitude. That tackle was full of work rate, passion and commitement. Yes, sometimes playing like that will get you sent of, but I prefer that then to have him jogging around waiting for our team to win a ball. And it was for a yellow card anyway.

I have a conspiracy theory, red card was given in order to increase probability of penalties so they could be tested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Magic Lamps

Magic Lamps 11,653

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sh0n3x said:

I got no problem with his attitude. That tackle was full of work rate, passion and commitement. Yes, sometimes playing like that will get you sent of, but I prefer that then to have him jogging around waiting for our team to win a ball. And it was for a yellow card anyway.

I have a conspiracy theory, red card was given in order to increase probability of penalties so they could be tested.

maybe you are right. But the tackle was reckless with open studs nowhere near the ball. There was no need to foul the player we were in full control of the match they did not get a sniff of our goal. If he does not make that tackle we win the match. And it was not that Pedro was any useful in the match. He was going to be subbed off anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter