Pedro Rodríguez

[Socur Toxanarosa 145]

2 hours ago, Supermonkey92 said:

Not in this formation he is not. James is notoriously lazy. Say goodbye to the press from pedro and the constant movement behind the defence. Pedro gets back well too. This team has balance and pretty boy will mess it up, i guarantee it will be torres all over again

 

35 minutes ago, manpe said:

Please do an analysis on how James Rodriguez would improve our team at the moment in place of Pedro.

The forwards in this system have more freedom, they have to do some pressure for sure but nothing James couldn't do. Offensively tho, he is light years ahead of Pedro and having a player of Hazard's calibre on the other side would take the team to the next level.

[Sideshow Luiz 2,310]

For me, the only answer is Griezmann.  (Maybe Di Maria).  I'm not sure about James.  For James kind of money, Id rather see the club push the boat all the way out and go hard for Griezmann.

[Jase 43,479]

Would rather go for Griezmann than James. The former is a hard worker and guarantees goals, lots of them. If we are to continue with this 3-4-3 for the long term, then think Griezmann suits it better than James and he complements Hazard and Costa better than James. We need variations and players of different qualities in our front 3. Playing similar players there will not help.

[Amblève. 4,995]

22 minutes ago, Jason said:

Would rather go for Griezmann than James. The former is a hard worker and guarantees goals, lots of them. If we are to continue with this 3-4-3 for the long term, then think Griezmann suits it better than James and he complements Hazard and Costa better than James. We need variations and players of different qualities in our front 3. Playing similar players there will not help.

No chance of getting Griezmann IMO, though. Nabil Fekir is the answer.

[Jase 43,479]

6 minutes ago, Amblève. said:

No chance of getting Griezmann IMO, though

If we want to start winning major honors on a consistent basis again, then we likely need to fork some big money to get quality players. And who knows, if Simeone leaves Atletico, then Griezmann might want to leave too. IIRC, he said he didn't want to leave Atletico last summer because of Simeone.

[Captain Ahmed 528]

-47 Touches

-80 % Dribbles Success

-5 Dribbles Success

-86% Pass Success

-3 Key Passes,2 Assists,1 Goal

-4 Total Shots

-100% Tackles Success

[BoyBlue96 990]

7 hours ago, Amblève. said:

No chance of getting Griezmann IMO, though. Nabil Fekir is the answer.

Griezmann has Manchester United written all over him so...

 

Reason Pedro has become better is because we are playing dominant football a la Barca. Pedro doesn't work in a defensive system hence why he failed under Mou and later on Hiddink.

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

7 hours ago, Jason said:

Would rather go for Griezmann than James. The former is a hard worker and guarantees goals, lots of them. If we are to continue with this 3-4-3 for the long term, then think Griezmann suits it better than James and he complements Hazard and Costa better than James. We need variations and players of different qualities in our front 3. Playing similar players there will not help.

That's the common consesus here but isn't Griezmann a striker these days? Similar to Aubemeyang, it was the change in position that transformed him to a top player. I know Griezmann can play there as he's done for France and I know our system is fluid and constantly mobile and hypothetically, he won't be stuck out on the wings so much, but in a 3-4-3, i'm not convinced Griezmann will be as good. Unless we make an adjustment to a 3-5-2 and have Hazard in the hole with Costa and Griezmann as a conventional striker pair. 

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

7 hours ago, Amblève. said:

No chance of getting Griezmann IMO, though. Nabil Fekir is the answer.

I haven't paid attention to him recently but he doesn't seem to be playing to the level of about a year ago. 

[Tomo 21,730]

10 minutes ago, MrExcalibur100 said:

That's the common consesus here but isn't Griezmann a striker these days? Similar to Aubemeyang, it was the change in position that transformed him to a top player. I know Griezmann can play there as he's done for France and I know our system is fluid and constantly mobile and hypothetically, he won't be stuck out on the wings so much, but in a 3-4-3, i'm not convinced Griezmann will be as good. Unless we make an adjustment to a 3-5-2 and have Hazard in the hole with Costa and Griezmann as a conventional striker pair. 

 Dybala would be perfect but i accept its very unlikely, him, Costa and Hazard interchanging would be 2nd only to MSN. Diegos movement pulls defenders all over the place, imagine Hazard and Dybala benefiting.

[DYC. 7,542]

8 minutes ago, Tomo said:

 Dybala would be perfect but i accept its very unlikely, him, Costa and Hazard interchanging would be 2nd only to MSN. Diegos movement pulls defenders all over the place, imagine Hazard and Dybala benefiting.

What about the front three that won the CL twice in the past three years?

Bale would be perfect. Griezmann 2nd, Dybala 3rd. Dybala's level dropped in the final months of 15/16 and it's dropped even further now. He's still a developing player. Griezmann is past that, he's a star. But they all play for big clubs. Players like that have never come easy for Chelsea.

But I think Salah, and I can't believe I'm saying this, would be a good alternative. He's not quite as refined as someone like Mahrez but he's more powerful and aggressive. And I think he'd be a better fit because of that. He's always a problem with his lightning speed and he knows how to score goal. 14 league goals (6 assists) last season and 8 (4 assists) in the current campaign. Does not take set-pieces if I'm not mistaken. Loved his humble character when he was here, which seemed genuine. Looked like he really wanted to make it at Chelsea.

[Socur Toxanarosa 145]

Griezmann is not a realistic target, there are only two for me: James who is upset for not playing and Mahrez.

[Tomo 21,730]

33 minutes ago, DYC. said:

What about the front three that won the CL twice in the past three years?

Bale would be perfect. Griezmann 2nd, Dybala 3rd. Dybala's level dropped in the final months of 15/16 and it's dropped even further now. He's still a developing player. Griezmann is past that, he's a star. But they all play for big clubs. Players like that have never come easy for Chelsea.

But I think Salah, and I can't believe I'm saying this, would be a good alternative. He's not quite as refined as someone like Mahrez but he's more powerful and aggressive. And I think he'd be a better fit because of that. He's always a problem with his lightning speed and he knows how to score goal. 14 league goals (6 assists) last season and 8 (4 assists) in the current campaign. Does not take set-pieces if I'm not mistaken. Loved his humble character when he was here, which seemed genuine. Looked like he really wanted to make it at Chelsea.

My only worry if we got Bale in hypothetical land is that he hugely relies on athletic qualities, technically he isn't that great and coming up 28 next year and with a dodgy injury record....

Maybe I let personal preference get in the way, but I do think the Real front three as a whole lack the pure technical element, already aluded to it with Bale and Ronaldo is similarly athlete more than technical player, of course it doesn't matter too much when they score at that rate they do, but I have felt the lack of creativity from the pair sometimes becomes an issue vs deep defenses or a team who cut out the supply line, compare to MSN who can do it on their own if need be.

[Gilvorak 3,734]

Mahrez is the only realistic target I can think of. The likes of Griezmann & Dybala would cost an arm & a leg.

[Fernando 6,423]

Payet might want to leave from west ham . . . . . 

[Jase 43,479]

6 hours ago, MrExcalibur100 said:

That's the common consesus here but isn't Griezmann a striker these days? Similar to Aubemeyang, it was the change in position that transformed him to a top player. I know Griezmann can play there as he's done for France and I know our system is fluid and constantly mobile and hypothetically, he won't be stuck out on the wings so much, but in a 3-4-3, i'm not convinced Griezmann will be as good. Unless we make an adjustment to a 3-5-2 and have Hazard in the hole with Costa and Griezmann as a conventional striker pair. 

Griezmann isn't exactly an out-and-out striker that you have to stick him through the middle. He's versatile enough to play anywhere across the front line and he can come short to link up in the build-up play (he plays as a second ST at Atletico from time to time) or he can play on the shoulder of the opposition's defenders.

[Jase 43,479]

5 hours ago, Socur Toxanarosa said:

Griezmann is not a realistic target, there are only two for me: James who is upset for not playing and Mahrez.

 

3 hours ago, Gilvorak said:

Mahrez is the only realistic target I can think of. The likes of Griezmann & Dybala would cost an arm & a leg.

If we want to succeed big time, then we gotta pay big money to get the big players. Haven't we been complaining about the board being too stingy and ended up buying average players who don't add anything to the squad? And until Mahrez can prove last season's achievement was no fluke and he's not a one-season wonder, I'd suggest we stay away from him.

3 hours ago, Fernando said:

Payet might want to leave from west ham . . . . . 

He's turning 30 next year. Would suggest we look elsewhere.

[Sideshow Luiz 2,310]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

 

If we want to succeed big time, then we gotta pay big money to get the big players. Haven't we been complaining about the board being too stingy and ended up buying average players who don't add anything to the squad? And until Mahrez can prove last season's achievement was no fluke and he's not a one-season wonder, I'd suggest we stay away from him.

He's turning 30 next year. Would suggest we look elsewhere.

I have to agree with this.  When the Hazard wooing sweepstakes were on, I didn't think we'd be able to get him.  Luckily, the board thought differently.