didierforever 7,349 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 i just did enswer the question and no Matic wasnt MOTM in all of those gameshttp://www.goal.com/en/match/manchester-city-vs-chelsea/2043057/ratings"Did not play badly on an individual level but was let down by those around him in the middle as City came by time and again."http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959776/Live/England-Premier-League-2015-2016-Everton-Chelsea8.6 rating in a game where we lost 3-1.http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959762/Live/England-Premier-League-2015-2016-Chelsea-Crystal-Palace2nd highest rating in the team.so exactly when was he awful?60minutes of newcastle? 17 against porto or 20 against soton? a total of 100 poor minutes of football has made him AWFUL?i am sorry, but the fact that most on here can see that matic is nowhere near the problem should be a good enough indicator. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 http://www.goal.com/en/match/manchester-city-vs-chelsea/2043057/ratings"Did not play badly on an individual level but was let down by those around him in the middle as City came by time and again."http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959776/Live/England-Premier-League-2015-2016-Everton-Chelsea8.6 rating in a game where we lost 3-1.http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959762/Live/England-Premier-League-2015-2016-Chelsea-Crystal-Palace2nd highest rating in the team.so exactly when was he awful?60minutes of newcastle? 17 against porto or 20 against soton? a total of 100 poor minutes of football has made him AWFUL?i am sorry, but the fact that most on here can see that matic is nowhere near the problem should be a good enough indicator.Matic hasnt been awful this season but he also hasnt been anywhere near his best either. Now before you start saying that is because he is covering for others etc etc.... that whilst might be a small element in one or two games is not why. His timing on tackles seems to be slightly out and he also seems to be getting out muscled by a few opponents. Whether this down to confidence....who knows?His overall game management which is not always picked up on camera seems to be down a level as well. When on top form he was always on the move and his anticipation of developing situations was great plus the understanding he had with JT and Azpillcueta on the left worked brilliantly at times......all of that has gone missing at times.I know posters want players x y and z to come in but Matic needs to have players around him that he can trust and they trust him King11Didier, didierforever and Essien19 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 spot on!!! one of the worst instances of man-management i have seen.as for his "form", when u have to control the whole mid yourself, any player in the history of football would struggle. we can clone makelele, and he would get owned playing alongside cesc as a DM.cant blame matic one bit. he will be out next summer. probably to city to replace yaya or maybe we sell him to arsenal and complete their squad (world class Gk and DM, something they had been clamouring for the last 10 years).Now, I'm not saying he isn't handicapped by having Cesc next to him, but that isn't an excuse for his poor form this season, and that is coming from a massive fan of his.Against Everton he had Mikel next to him and still had a shocker despite the wonder goal, Matic snapping out of this lull with go a long way to sorting the defense issues. Essien19 and Pacquiao 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Now, I'm not saying he isn't handicapped by having Cesc next to him, but that isn't an excuse for his poor form this season, and that is coming from a massive fan of his.Against Everton he had Mikel next to him and still had a shocker despite the wonder goal, Matic snapping out of this lull with go a long way to sorting the defense issues.8 tackles won, 4 interceptions made, 1 goal.http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959776/LiveStatistics/England-Premier-League-2015-2016-Everton-Chelseaif that was a shocker, i would take a shocker every week.http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/20594-everton-3-1-chelsea/page-9he was probably the only player who could have walked with his head held up high.yes, he played alongside mikel, but mikel was poor in the game. the first 2 goals were avoidable if we had aina instead of iva as a RB.i am actually surprised by you saying that matic had a shocker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 8 tackles won, 4 interceptions made, 1 goal.http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959776/LiveStatistics/England-Premier-League-2015-2016-Everton-Chelseaif that was a shocker, i would take a shocker every week.http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/20594-everton-3-1-chelsea/page-9he was probably the only player who could have walked with his head held up high.yes, he played alongside mikel, but mikel was poor in the game. the first 2 goals were avoidable if we had aina instead of iva as a RB.i am actually surprised by you saying that matic had a shocker.Gary Neville done some analysis on Matic in that game, he had a good game stats wise but his positioning was all over the place at times, including for Evertons opening goal.I remember when Luiz had games were he stormed it statiscally but made a few mistakes which rendered his impressive stats meaningless, I'm not trying to compare the two, just putting some perspective on it. Pacquiao 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilvorak 3,734 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Why are people pretending his poor form came out of the blue? He wasn't that good last season at all. In fact his best form came in his debut season when he was paired with Luiz, he's been incredibly inconsistent ever since.Was him getting dominated by Fellaini at Old Trafford an illusion? Did him getting thoroughly outclassed by Motta in the CL despite PSG being down to 10 men never happen? Jose never paired Mikel/Zouma to hold his hand in tough away games?Everything is blamed on Cesc yet he actually covers more distance than the majority of midfielders. Arsenal can get away with Cazorla in CM because of Coquelin. City can afford to play Yaya in CM because of Fernandinho but the supposed best DM in the World can't protect Cesc?His passing is woeful, he takes too long on the ball. You watch Kroos, Busquets, Carrick, Fernandinho play and they only need 1/2 touches to release the ball while Matic thinks he's Messi out there. And he always gets dragged wide and is easy to play through in between the lines. While our fans are boasting about tackles which matter little for a defensive midfielder (like seriously? his job his to shut down passing lanes, tackles are a last resort) here's Naismith. Freaking Naismith destroying Matic in that 3-1 but but but Cesc as if Mikel isn't pairing him. Even Neville who's a big fan acknowledged his poor performance.He might be the most overrated Chelsea player I've seen in my lifetime. Next Makelele my arse. Essien19, Peace. and Pacquiao 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DYC. 7,542 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I personally thought Matic was brilliant in 2014. A great year overall. But his form has been waning since the start of the year. His partner isn't ideal but it's an excuse for the most part. A mitigating factor, sure, but you simply can't shift complete blame like that. Like the poster above says, he's not the first or only one playing alongside a lightweight or a defensively flawed partner. That's why Busquets impresses me so much, as a lone DM. Barca are far more dominant, yes, but there's a far greater margin for error when the ball is lost.I don't know if he's going through a rut, which would not be uncommon at all. In fact, the very same Busquets went through that in in 2013 and the first half of 2014. But it's possible he was riding on a cloud that year and won't ever reach a level like that again. I'm sure he'll improve his current form, but he might not be capable of being as commanding as first.But I don't blame individuals in this current form of the team. As a team, Chelsea is simply all over the place defensively.I do think the midfield (and attack) isn't played to it's strength. I think a lot of power and dynamism is asked of them but that's not where there strength lies. Chelsea have just felt unbalanced and unstable the entire year and the tape, chewing gum and spit that was holding the foundation together have dried up. Pacquiao, CHOULO19 and Gilvorak 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I'm not accepting this , he is a magnificent player. Our boneheaded manager needs to give us 433, a formation that benefits everyone , but we linger with the detestable 4231 for whatever reason. The Mak, killer1257, didierforever and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Gary Neville done some analysis on Matic in that game, he had a good game stats wise but his positioning was all over the place at times, including for Evertons opening goal.I remember when Luiz had games were he stormed it statiscally but made a few mistakes which rendered his impressive stats meaningless, I'm not trying to compare the two, just putting some perspective on it.everton's first goal. yes. but overall he had a brilliant game. i remember the GN's analysis. but to be fair, i can point out a fault in every player for every goal that any team in the world concedes. plus, i remember GN talking about a midfield 4. hell, the point of playing cesc as a CAM is to make it a midfield 5. none of the clips that he showed even once had a midfield 5, courtesy cesc. and not once did GN talk about that. matic might not be the same player as last year, but he has been no where near to "awful".but unfortunately, in football, u are only as good as your last game. and matic has had 3 shockers on the trot (newcastle, porto sub and soton sub). so people are wrongly accusing him of being a problem, he is far from it. the problem lies with 2 players or rather 3 people, IVANOVIC, CESC and JOSE. have been saying this since the WBA line up came up. i remember u telling me "not to jump the ship so early", but i was not. if a manager cant drop 2 players after the way they performed against city, he was never going to drop them. the problem was evident and glaring at us since that early. right now, people are literally scapegoating each and every player to take the blame off the 3 main culprits.ps - just read the post below yours. "the most overrated player in the history of chelsea" and this guy is an oscar fan!!! :lol: Shaan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzchap 8,966 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Whatever the Reason - I think we are all agreed 4-2-3-1 is no longer a viable formation I would move to 4-4-1-1 with Willian/Cesc sitting in behind Costa Matic and RLC in the middle and Hazard / Pedro out wide That would be a little better IMHO and wouldn't leave us exposed in the middle between defence and midfield. Matic could effectively play in the Makalele role and RLC with his athleticism could be the runner (box to box)I doubt we would ever see this formation though - especially as I would have Azpi on the right and Baba on the left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Whatever the Reason - I think we are all agreed 4-2-3-1 is no longer a viable formationI would move to 4-4-1-1 with Willian/Cesc sitting in behind CostaMatic and RLC in the middle and Hazard / Pedro out wideThat would be a little better IMHO and wouldn't leave us exposed in the middle between defence and midfield.Matic could effectively play in the Makalele role and RLC with his athleticism could be the runner (box to box)I doubt we would ever see this formation though - especially as I would have Azpi on the right and Baba on the left 4-4-1-1 with hazard and pedro is essentially a 4-2-3-1.or rather it would eventually end up as a 4-2-3-1 itself. but i would not mind giving it a try as long as mr. no balls is out of the team. or the best possible thing is to simply turn to 4-3-3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mak 4,459 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Matic has to cover for both Ivanovic and Cesc, talk about a stressful job. It doesn't really leave much room for even a small dip in form. I feel sorry for him in many ways.Replace them with Baba and Ruben and I think he would improve instantly. lucio, Bosnian Blue, Muzchap and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Best option next game imo is: mikel sitting , matic and rlc marauding. Proper fullbacks. Reintroduce cesc eventually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Matic has to cover for both Ivanovic and Cesc, talk about a stressful job. It doesn't really leave much room for even a small dip in form.Replace them with Baba and Ruben and I think he would improve instantly.Matic does not and has not been covering for Ivan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 This. People who aren't a fan of Matic would argue that it is ludicrous to say he is a top DM or compare him to Busquets for example. Any DM in our team with Fabregas being exposed how he is would struggle. Matic is not our main problem. If we had Verratti or Modric in the double pivot, Matic would look a lot better but Fabregas is not suited to playing in the double pivot. He is suited to a 4-3-3. I see Fabregas as more of a liability than Matic in our team.He didn't struggle so much last season when he was on form...Look, Cesc doesn't help but that doesn't explain Matic's poor form. Can't blame Fabregas for it. Matic has been awful himself. CHOULO19 and Pacquiao 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The Skipper 20,609 Posted October 12, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted October 12, 2015 IMO, our best midfield three is Cesc, RLC & Matic. RLC perfectly balances and complements both players in a midfield three tandem IMO. The Mak, bababoom, Beepu and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar 441 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 IMO, our best midfield three is Cesc, RLC & Matic. RLC perfectly balances and complements both players in a midfield three tandem IMO.How? RLC doesn't have the workrate of neither oscar or rambo. The speed/stamina of rambo and the ability to press like Oscar..If anything, having him would expose Cesc more because of his lack of workrate defensively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar 441 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Agreed, however Matic would be a huge improvement over the fernandosDon't think so.Matic has better positioning and strength than Fernandinho, however, that is all I would say. To me, a fit and inform fernandino is more important to City than yaya is now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar 441 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 This. People who aren't a fan of Matic would argue that it is ludicrous to say he is a top DM or compare him to Busquets for example. Any DM in our team with Fabregas being exposed how he is would struggle. Matic is not our main problem. If we had Verratti or Modric in the double pivot, Matic would look a lot better but Fabregas is not suited to playing in the double pivot. He is suited to a 4-3-3. I see Fabregas as more of a liability than Matic in our team.So, now Verratti can play in the pivot and Cesc cannot??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 How? RLC doesn't have the workrate of neither oscar or rambo. The speed/stamina of rambo and the ability to press like Oscar..If anything, having him would expose Cesc more because of his lack of workrate defensively.He is capable of a good defensive shift (liverpool) , has athleticism and technique. He is fast for a man of his size. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.