Eligius 121 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Ramires better than Bradley, and I don't like to say Ramires is better than anyone. Playing Ramires on the same team as hazard is a shame, playing Bradley on the same team as Hazard is tragedy.What an 18 year old that we haven't seen too much from? He's a prospect for sure but he's got a lot of hype because he's on Bayern and they will probably just use him by selling him to an MLS team for good $$$.Usa has a few guys.Julian Green and the kid from Arsenal. Green won't be sold to the MLS. MLS don't buy young talent like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodIsBlue 291 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Usa has a few guys.Julian Green and the kid from Arsenal. Green won't be sold to the MLS. MLS don't buy young talent like that. MLS is a fluid league it's changing, they want more DP spots and they want to be involved in creating US nationals more. Julian's 3 yr contract length also shows Bayern's moderate faith in him, which is normal. With the salary cap it's obviously not able to cater to the more elite youth but they are looking to develop youth. The salary cap will slowly keep growing but they want to isolate the league from Europe for a bit while it still grows. I'm glad Julian chose USA over Germany, the sport needs to grow here in North America. Julian Green can help that he could end up being the most exciting US player ever, maybe not the best but exciting to watch he should however it doesn't mean he is that great (or good enough to play on Chelsea). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petre.ispirescu 4,928 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 If only Toronto would let Bradley go. He'd be a EPL superstar after his season here.Chelsea should try loaning Toronto some players. Two-year loan and some money too. Maybe Chalobah, Marin, Piazon + £10M would to the trick.Ramires out, Bradley in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,718 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Ramires out, Bradley in. . Two-year loan and some money too. Maybe Chalobah, Marin, Piazon + £10M would to the trick.Are you joking? Chalobah and Piazon to Canada? He sucked at Aston Villa, he was a backup in Rome, how would he be a superstar here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DROGBAtheGOAT 29 Posted April 5, 2014 Author Share Posted April 5, 2014 Are you joking? Chalobah and Piazon to Canada? He sucked at Aston Villa, he was a backup in Rome, how would he be a superstar here?Matic was also terrible during his first tenure here. Assuming players don't get better is a heroic mistake. Bradley is by far the best player on the USA national team and an excellent #8. It seems like early on in his career he was deployed in a #6 role where I don't think he is best utilized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,996 Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 Someone tell me this was an April Fools thread bump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Matic was also terrible during his first tenure here. Assuming players don't get better is a heroic mistake. Bradley is by far the best player on the USA national team and an excellent #8. It seems like early on in his career he was deployed in a #6 role where I don't think he is best utilized.If he's so good why weren't clubs in Europe queuing up for him? Why did he go to the MLS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 This thread is hilarious You dont know if people realy think Bradley would be superstar here or just trolling... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hybrid Angel 2,130 Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 I can't do anything but laugh at this thread Bradley would be an average EPL player at his very very best. Even if we needed a #8 there are many better and younger options out there. All of our CMs are better than Bradley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HGNTorres 0 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Hello there, I've been visiting this website from few weeks ago but I didn't feel like registering but finally I did.I'd like to start my first post by collecting opinions about US' player Michael Bradley. Against Belgium, Bradley's contributions didn't come until it was too late. Down 2-0 in extra time he set up Julian Green's goal with a beautiful chip pass that cut the deficit to one.https://vine.co/v/MFL2hg9OMK6A few minutes later, Bradley executed the first part of a free kick set play that almost resulted in an equalizing goal for Dempsey.https://vine.co/v/MFLExbXWhTVSadly there are no official rumors about him but since Lampard left, he'd be an accurate choice.What do you think about him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Not good enough for Chelsea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 We just bought Fabregas. Dont see the point of getting him aswell. Did really well yesterday though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranklyFrank 103 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Ya I could totally see him starting over Fabregas :confused: . But seriously he could maybe play for a Championship side or a low Premier League team but I didn't feel that he played well this World cup and maybe couldn't even make that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HGNTorres 0 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Not good enough for Chelsea.Indeed, he's not someone who Chelsea would pay 30+ millions of Euros, but is a fact that he has potential, giving him a try wouldn't hurt too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Indeed, he's not someone who Chelsea would pay 30+ millions of Euros, but is a fact that he has potential, giving him a try wouldn't hurt too much.Potential? He's 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HGNTorres 0 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Potential? He's 27.Yes, he's already good and that's why I think he'd be capable of being even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stroey 2,525 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Too bad to play for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rising Sun 714 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 He would have been good for a fulham sort of team, or even a loan at everton could be possible. Nothing above though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 He's shit. Well, in the WC he was. Especially against Belgium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickpassnmove 924 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Not good enough. Bradley can make some nice passes, but doesn't respond to pressure around him well enough, nor is he nimble & technical enough under pressure. He's also not very strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts