Jump to content

No.10 Role


Jase
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mata had a better stat last season(chances created) than zidane or iniesta probably ever had in one single season, does that make him a better CAM than Zidane or iniesta?

It makes him a very good player who deserves to be the CAM in the starting XI. I don't like your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mata had a better stat last season(chances created) than zidane or iniesta probably ever had in one single season, does that make him a better CAM than Zidane or iniesta?

Exactly...

Just like how Messi and Cristiano are racking in tons of goals for Barca and Madrid, the best striker will always be Ronaldo.

Mata was in a system where he exploded (probably could of scored more goals and assists had Luiz not taken some free kicks and if our CF was in form). I would be shocked if he ever replicates last season stats again....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes him a very good player who deserves to be the CAM in the starting XI. I don't like your question.

Why? Because it contradicts your idea of stats. First of all mata is not a CAM like you've been posting but an AM whose duty is solely to give goals and assists which is what he does and what he has to contribute when playing N0.10 but players like Oscar/zidane/iniesta are CAM's and quite different from players like mata when playing No.10 because they are real midfielders with ability to score and assist but in addition possess other play making qualities aside from scoring and assisting therefore they usually spend more time deeper in midfield than an AM who plays in the final third and therefore they have less statistics naturally in the final third than AM's but that doesn't make them any less effective to the team than an AM. So the debate about Mata vs Oscar in no.10 is really about having an AM vs CAM as no. 10 and currently with the imbalance in our pivot oscar as CAM 10 is a better fit and offers more to the team as a whole. Mata as AM 10 will leave our pivot exposed when we are not in possession. Its not mata's fault but a deficiency that oscar masks by being a CAM with especially more defensive cabability than usual but also very effective in attack.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Because it contradicts your idea of stats. First of all mata is not a CAM like you've been posting but an AM whose duty is solely to give goals and assists which is what he does and what he has to contribute when playing N0.10 but players like Oscar/zidane/iniesta are CAM's and quite different from players like mata when playing No.10 because they are real midfielders with ability to score and assist but in addition possess other play making qualities aside from scoring and assisting therefore they usually spend more time deeper in midfield than an AM who plays in the final third and therefore they have less statistics naturally in the final third than AM's but that doesn't make them any less effective to the team than an AM. So the debate about Mata vs Oscar in no.10 is really about having an AM vs CAM as no. 10 and currently with the imbalance in our pivot oscar as CAM 10 is a better fit and offers more to the team as a whole. Mata as AM 10 will leave our pivot exposed when we are not in possession. Its not mata's fault but a deficiency that oscar masks by being a CAM with especially more defensive cabability than usual but also very effective in attack.

No because I don't think Oscar or Mata are in the same league of Zidane and Iniesta, and because both players are big names that never played for Chelsea. I've read the things you said before by other members, nothing new there.

Once Oscar reaches the level of Iniesta or Zidane I would gladly talk about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking, Oscar is a good player. But Mata, he does everything better than Oscar, except scoring goals. But maybe because the strikers are not scoring goals, Oscar must play because he and Lampard are the only ones we know can score goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking, Oscar is a good player. But Mata, he does everything better than Oscar, except scoring goals. But maybe because the strikers are not scoring goals, Oscar must play because he and Lampard are the only ones we know can score goals.

Work rate as well, over the few games we have played , Oscar has shown tremendous work rate and incredible intelligence in defending and pressing .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Work rate as well, over the few games we have played , Oscar has shown tremendous work rate and incredible intelligence in defending and pressing .

Mata's is getting there in terms of work rate and defensive responsibility. Oscar's definitely better in that matter but Mata is better in creating goals when not on the counter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mata's is getting there in terms of work rate and defensive responsibility. Oscar's definitely better in that matter but Mata is better in creating goals when not on the counter.

getting there, until I made the statement he hasn't. I fully expect him to reach the same level of work-rate though, the same way I expect Oscar to increase his creative attributes. Eventually they'll keep becoming better in different areas of their play, and Jose will play them both together for a stretch of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

getting there, until I made the statement he hasn't. I fully expect him to reach the same level of work-rate though, the same way I expect Oscar to increase his creative attributes. Eventually they'll keep becoming better in different areas of their play, and Jose will play them both together for a stretch of games.

Atleast, Hazard checks all boxes for me ;) ...maybe not in the form of his life right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking, Oscar is a good player. But Mata, he does everything better than Oscar, except scoring goals. But maybe because the strikers are not scoring goals, Oscar must play because he and Lampard are the only ones we know can score goals.

Mata's goalscoring record since joining has been brilliant since joining us. Despite not hitting the net yet he is probably the best scoring attacker in our attacking midfield. Mata got around 20 goals last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mata's goalscoring record since joining has been brilliant since joining us. Despite not hitting the net yet he is probably the best scoring attacker in our attacking midfield. Mata got around 20 goals last season.

I think there is more to this than just the statistic... I see Mata miss chances more often than Oscar..

Last season, he play more than Oscar and he is the main person. Now this is not the case, so Oscar should be getting many more chances to score goals... and in this case, I think Oscar is better in shooting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You